Re: [94attendees] IHG "Non-qualifying Stay"?

JORDI PALET MARTINEZ <jordi.palet@consulintel.es> Wed, 18 November 2015 16:42 UTC

Return-Path: <prvs=17645b7597=jordi.palet@consulintel.es>
X-Original-To: 94attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 94attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0AC281A6F7B for <94attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 18 Nov 2015 08:42:38 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -99.2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-99.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.8, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id P9gpaivtvbpf for <94attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 18 Nov 2015 08:42:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.consulintel.com (mail.consulintel.com [213.0.69.132]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7466C1A6F5D for <94attendees@ietf.org>; Wed, 18 Nov 2015 08:42:36 -0800 (PST)
X-MDAV-Processed: mail.consulintel.com, Wed, 18 Nov 2015 17:42:32 +0100
Received: from [10.10.10.212] by mail.consulintel.com (MDaemon PRO v11.0.3) with ESMTP id md50000325702.msg for <94attendees@ietf.org>; Wed, 18 Nov 2015 17:42:30 +0100
X-Spam-Processed: mail.consulintel.com, Wed, 18 Nov 2015 17:42:30 +0100 (not processed: spam filter heuristic analysis disabled)
X-MDOP-RefID: re=0.000,fgs=0 (_st=1 _vt=0 _iwf=0)
X-Return-Path: prvs=17645b7597=jordi.palet@consulintel.es
X-Envelope-From: jordi.palet@consulintel.es
X-MDaemon-Deliver-To: 94attendees@ietf.org
User-Agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/0.0.0.151105
Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2015 17:42:29 +0100
From: JORDI PALET MARTINEZ <jordi.palet@consulintel.es>
To: "94attendees@ietf.org" <94attendees@ietf.org>
Message-ID: <6C72AC8E-50CA-459A-84EC-A189163D146B@consulintel.es>
Thread-Topic: [94attendees] IHG "Non-qualifying Stay"?
References: <E0B9279C-1A3C-4E61-8F7E-6D78B15AA8BA@netapp.com> <22085.62797.741761.727196@tale.kendall.corp.akamai.com> <5e70f48cb49043408ceeeaedebd34f10@XCH-RCD-009.cisco.com> <22311667-3592-4CE4-A65D-DB2A1B90D09A@netapp.com> <82AB329A76E2484D934BBCA77E9F5249A6799E00@PALLENE.office.hd> <alpine.BSF.2.20.1511181126110.55717@fledge.watson.org> <E63AF10D-B895-4FE0-98C2-BE4BB00C602A@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <E63AF10D-B895-4FE0-98C2-BE4BB00C602A@gmail.com>
Mime-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/94attendees/G6CENrNUzeuMmFNAg9dwQyhdmN4>
Subject: Re: [94attendees] IHG "Non-qualifying Stay"?
X-BeenThere: 94attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: jordi.palet@consulintel.es
List-Id: "Mailing list of IETF 94 attendees that have opted in on this list. " <94attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/94attendees>, <mailto:94attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/94attendees/>
List-Post: <mailto:94attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:94attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/94attendees>, <mailto:94attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2015 16:42:38 -0000

I understand that, but you also probably understand that many folks pay the hotel, IETF cost, flight, etc., from their own pocket, so being able to keep the points is VERY relevant for saving some nights at future meetings.







-----Mensaje original-----
De: 94attendees <94attendees-bounces@ietf.org>; en nombre de Ralph Droms <rdroms.ietf@gmail.com>;
Responder a: <rdroms.ietf@gmail.com>;
Fecha: miƩrcoles, 18 de noviembre de 2015, 17:31
Para: "94attendees@ietf.org"; <94attendees@ietf.org>;
Asunto: Re: [94attendees] IHG "Non-qualifying Stay"?

>Speaking strictly for myself, the issue of loyalty program points is completely immaterial to me and I don't want the IAC spending its time on the issue.
>
>- Ralph
>
>> On Nov 18, 2015, at 11:27 AM 11/18/15, Samuel Weiler <weiler+ietf@watson.org>; wrote:
>> 
>> On Wed, 18 Nov 2015, Dirk Kutscher wrote:
>> 
>>> Regarding the IAOC, I am really against requesting information on reward programs etc. from the IAOC.
>>> 
>>> First, it's too much effort (there are different reward programs with different conditions...).
>> 
>> All the more reason to save duplication of that effort.
>> 
>> I don't need loyalty programs to be a factor in picking venues, but if things are going to be odd (e.g. meeting rates don't earn points), we should be told up front.  And this is not about digging into the rules for all the different programs - it's about asking one more question once the IAOC decides we're going to a particular hotel.
>> 
>> -- Sam
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> 94attendees mailing list
>> 94attendees@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/94attendees
>
>_______________________________________________
>94attendees mailing list
>94attendees@ietf.org
>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/94attendees