Re: [94attendees] IHG "Non-qualifying Stay"?

Robert Moskowitz <rgm@labs.htt-consult.com> Wed, 18 November 2015 14:26 UTC

Return-Path: <rgm@labs.htt-consult.com>
X-Original-To: 94attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 94attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C84441B2E44 for <94attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 18 Nov 2015 06:26:41 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.887
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.887 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_40=-0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.585, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id T1dyFZpUPBjy for <94attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 18 Nov 2015 06:26:40 -0800 (PST)
Received: from z9m9z.htt-consult.com (z9m9z.htt-consult.com [50.253.254.3]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 954DE1B2E43 for <94attendees@ietf.org>; Wed, 18 Nov 2015 06:26:40 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by z9m9z.htt-consult.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE72B60184; Wed, 18 Nov 2015 09:26:36 -0500 (EST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at htt-consult.com
Received: from z9m9z.htt-consult.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (z9m9z.htt-consult.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 2o3Zj2+P+nxO; Wed, 18 Nov 2015 09:26:31 -0500 (EST)
Received: from lx120e.htt-consult.com (unknown [192.168.160.20]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by z9m9z.htt-consult.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 87B7B600B0; Wed, 18 Nov 2015 09:26:31 -0500 (EST)
To: "ietf@johnlevine.com" <ietf@johnlevine.com>, "Roberta Maglione (robmgl)" <robmgl@cisco.com>
References: <20151118133248.26202.qmail@ary.lan> <6E9B7510-65A5-4E21-B19D-9DB959033445@netapp.com> <c439bf9daba446d5957bcbd6c9246488@XCH-RCD-009.cisco.com> <alpine.OSX.2.11.1511180851250.53148@ary.lan>
From: Robert Moskowitz <rgm@labs.htt-consult.com>
Message-ID: <564C8A95.1090708@labs.htt-consult.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2015 09:26:29 -0500
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.3.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <alpine.OSX.2.11.1511180851250.53148@ary.lan>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/94attendees/HwYPEniX2VObY3T0tnEFHg6x-Do>
Cc: "94attendees@ietf.org" <94attendees@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [94attendees] IHG "Non-qualifying Stay"?
X-BeenThere: 94attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Mailing list of IETF 94 attendees that have opted in on this list. " <94attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/94attendees>, <mailto:94attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/94attendees/>
List-Post: <mailto:94attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:94attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/94attendees>, <mailto:94attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2015 14:26:41 -0000


On 11/18/2015 08:52 AM, ietf@johnlevine.com wrote:
>>>> Also, it shouldn't come as a surprise to anyone that hotel chains
>>>> don't give you points for group rates.  That's been the usual policy
>>>> since forever.
>>> Never happened to me, since forever.
>> Never happened to me as well.
>
> Odd.  Maybe we haven't stayed at many IHG properties.  I've stayed at 
> a bunch for other meetings and never that I can recall got points, 
> regardless of who paid.

In Berlin, I believe I did.

Or was tat some other chain?  It all blears together with so many 
airports and so many hotels.