Re: [94attendees] IPv6 Prefix delegation on IETF network, please ?

Jim Martin <jrmii@isc.org> Thu, 05 November 2015 07:37 UTC

Return-Path: <jrmii@isc.org>
X-Original-To: 94attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 94attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 511611B3B83; Wed, 4 Nov 2015 23:37:47 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.911
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.911 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jeX7tOACtvxb; Wed, 4 Nov 2015 23:37:46 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx.ams1.isc.org (mx.ams1.isc.org [IPv6:2001:500:60::65]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F23711B3B78; Wed, 4 Nov 2015 23:37:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: from zmx1.isc.org (zmx1.isc.org [149.20.0.20]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx.ams1.isc.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 656061FCAD4; Thu, 5 Nov 2015 07:37:42 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from zmx1.isc.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zmx1.isc.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8F06A160041; Thu, 5 Nov 2015 07:37:41 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zmx1.isc.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 791AB160031; Thu, 5 Nov 2015 07:37:41 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from zmx1.isc.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (zmx1.isc.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id 21ilqg91ZFIN; Thu, 5 Nov 2015 07:37:41 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from dhcp-84-9.meeting.ietf94.jp (dhcp-84-9.meeting.ietf94.jp [133.93.84.9]) by zmx1.isc.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D7B2716006E; Thu, 5 Nov 2015 06:17:46 +0000 (UTC)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.2 \(3108\))
From: Jim Martin <jrmii@isc.org>
In-Reply-To: <20151102055200.GI31730@cisco.com>
Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2015 15:17:44 +0900
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <3E1E53E2-C440-44C1-A29E-B2DA1591D284@isc.org>
References: <20151102055200.GI31730@cisco.com>
To: Toerless Eckert <eckert@cisco.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3108)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/94attendees/cMk0rYC5Ye-ZyLNsulfXdhmRlco>
Cc: "94attendees@ietf.org" <94attendees@ietf.org>, homenet@ietf.org, hackathon@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [94attendees] IPv6 Prefix delegation on IETF network, please ?
X-BeenThere: 94attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Mailing list of IETF 94 attendees that have opted in on this list. " <94attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/94attendees>, <mailto:94attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/94attendees/>
List-Post: <mailto:94attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:94attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/94attendees>, <mailto:94attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 Nov 2015 07:37:47 -0000

Toerless,
	I think this is definitely something we can look into as a feature for future IETFs. We’ll investigate the infrastructure changes needed and will see when and if we can do it. 

	Thanks for asking!

	- Jim

> On Nov 2, 2015, at 2:52 PM, Toerless Eckert <eckert@cisco.com> wrote:
> 
> Thought maybe other folks beside me would chime in maybe help to ask for this for IETF95:
> 
> I was trying to play around with Homenet/OpenWrt during the hackathon and could not
> nicely build out Homenet connection to the Internet because my internet provider
> of choice (IETF ;-) did not offer IPv6 prefix delegation on its network.
> 
> I opened a case with the NOC but only got a thank you, can't do this time, case
> closed back. Which i perfectly understand.
> 
> but if maybe more folks are interested to use/experiement (for whatever reason),
> then maybe there would be sufficient motivation to do it next time...
> 
> Let me know if there is a better mailing list to ask for this.
> 
> Thanks!
>    Toerless
> 
> _______________________________________________
> 94attendees mailing list
> 94attendees@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/94attendees