Re: [94attendees] IHG "Non-qualifying Stay"?

"Eggert, Lars" <lars@netapp.com> Wed, 18 November 2015 18:26 UTC

Return-Path: <lars@netapp.com>
X-Original-To: 94attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 94attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C2FD1A1BE5 for <94attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 18 Nov 2015 10:26:11 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.486
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.486 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.585, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id KQv-IheJM0QC for <94attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 18 Nov 2015 10:26:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx143.netapp.com (mx143.netapp.com [216.240.21.24]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2CCB11A1BC6 for <94attendees@ietf.org>; Wed, 18 Nov 2015 10:26:05 -0800 (PST)
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.20,314,1444719600"; d="asc'?scan'208";a="79492830"
Received: from hioexcmbx01-prd.hq.netapp.com ([10.122.105.34]) by mx143-out.netapp.com with ESMTP; 18 Nov 2015 10:24:30 -0800
Received: from HIOEXCMBX07-PRD.hq.netapp.com (10.122.105.40) by hioexcmbx01-prd.hq.netapp.com (10.122.105.34) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1130.7; Wed, 18 Nov 2015 10:24:30 -0800
Received: from HIOEXCMBX07-PRD.hq.netapp.com ([::1]) by hioexcmbx07-prd.hq.netapp.com ([fe80::b1d1:a335:f931:d4d5%21]) with mapi id 15.00.1130.005; Wed, 18 Nov 2015 10:24:30 -0800
From: "Eggert, Lars" <lars@netapp.com>
To: "Deen, Glenn (NBCUniversal)" <glenn.deen@nbcuni.com>
Thread-Topic: [94attendees] IHG "Non-qualifying Stay"?
Thread-Index: AQHRHe2iV8JMUOkOQke8UKNkFNZaQp6ai3iAgAdtpQCAAAP6AIAAcNIAgAAYUQCAAAEgAIAAAyCAgAAGE4CAAASWAIAAEdYA
Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2015 18:24:30 +0000
Message-ID: <720CB12F-7901-4E40-91FD-DA7F787CC0FE@netapp.com>
References: <E0B9279C-1A3C-4E61-8F7E-6D78B15AA8BA@netapp.com> <22085.62797.741761.727196@tale.kendall.corp.akamai.com> <5e70f48cb49043408ceeeaedebd34f10@XCH-RCD-009.cisco.com> <22311667-3592-4CE4-A65D-DB2A1B90D09A@netapp.com> <82AB329A76E2484D934BBCA77E9F5249A6799E00@PALLENE.office.hd> <alpine.BSF.2.20.1511181126110.55717@fledge.watson.org> <E63AF10D-B895-4FE0-98C2-BE4BB00C602A@gmail.com> <6C72AC8E-50CA-459A-84EC-A189163D146B@consulintel.es> <7EB77F2C-F486-4A2B-B51C-6DC57FAAAEBD@gmail.com> <D271F0B5.8B3C7%glenn.deen@nbcuni.com>
In-Reply-To: <D271F0B5.8B3C7%glenn.deen@nbcuni.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: yes
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-mailer: Apple Mail (2.3096.5)
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.120.60.35]
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_DFAC0587-089F-46BD-95A3-730A762CC342"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha256
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/94attendees/eXEQSxjDMigTUbmpBI7AXtGkE5M>
Cc: "94attendees@ietf.org" <94attendees@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [94attendees] IHG "Non-qualifying Stay"?
X-BeenThere: 94attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Mailing list of IETF 94 attendees that have opted in on this list. " <94attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/94attendees>, <mailto:94attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/94attendees/>
List-Post: <mailto:94attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:94attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/94attendees>, <mailto:94attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2015 18:26:11 -0000

On 2015-11-18, at 18:20, Deen, Glenn (NBCUniversal) <glenn.deen@nbcuni.com>; wrote:
> 
> I agree that the IAOC should not negotiate rates or venues based on what
> rewards programs would/would not be eligible.    However, it would
> reasonable and low effort to ask for full disclosure by the venue to
> inform the customer on the hotel registration page or hotel info, that the
> quoted rates do not qualify for the hotels rewards program.
> 
> The IAOC─ůs only involvement would be to request the hotel to disclosure
> their policy.   The IAOC would not change their rate negotiations or any
> part of the site selection, they would only request the policy disclosure
> from the hotel.
> 
> That way people know what the policy is.

I like this proposal.

Lars