Re: [94attendees] IHG "Non-qualifying Stay"?
David C Lawrence <tale@akamai.com> Fri, 13 November 2015 14:36 UTC
Return-Path: <tale@akamai.com>
X-Original-To: 94attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 94attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 069C61A8927 for <94attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 13 Nov 2015 06:36:00 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.011
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.011 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id yyTgRdYtN57y for <94attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 13 Nov 2015 06:35:59 -0800 (PST)
Received: from prod-mail-xrelay05.akamai.com (prod-mail-xrelay05.akamai.com [23.79.238.179]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0CA761A891A for <94attendees@ietf.org>; Fri, 13 Nov 2015 06:35:59 -0800 (PST)
Received: from prod-mail-xrelay05.akamai.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by postfix.imss70 (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C50F4D5B3; Fri, 13 Nov 2015 14:35:58 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from prod-mail-relay10.akamai.com (prod-mail-relay10.akamai.com [172.27.118.251]) by prod-mail-xrelay05.akamai.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 062004D5A8; Fri, 13 Nov 2015 14:35:58 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=akamai.com; s=a1; t=1447425358; bh=8/nOKcufMvufRxgnUK6AwPfPyA5EbXsDLatpM0q4Qvc=; l=210; h=Date:From:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=TMvTTsfqT9elGH0DrcUJuZCdVFazI6ixp+aY3Zuf2kukTCIfGdifSugHsbQ1AORie MnnyP7jK5sKYdcv+kpEaPo4BfnDKF2mm84PnGI6zqJgt1MfZGUIWBlqP0KKnumxxGG WifvX7A//Rh5WMUT4zkdEAaPx3DRTufg+9Ki3inI=
Received: from tale.kendall.corp.akamai.com (tale.kendall.corp.akamai.com [172.28.11.100]) by prod-mail-relay10.akamai.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D021D202D; Fri, 13 Nov 2015 14:35:57 +0000 (GMT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <22085.62797.741761.727196@tale.kendall.corp.akamai.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2015 09:35:57 -0500
From: David C Lawrence <tale@akamai.com>
To: Lars Eggert <lars@netapp.com>
In-Reply-To: <E0B9279C-1A3C-4E61-8F7E-6D78B15AA8BA@netapp.com>
References: <E0B9279C-1A3C-4E61-8F7E-6D78B15AA8BA@netapp.com>
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/94attendees/mgzodWwWoutDfOZxW4NMCxXGEII>
Cc: 94attendees@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [94attendees] IHG "Non-qualifying Stay"?
X-BeenThere: 94attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Mailing list of IETF 94 attendees that have opted in on this list. " <94attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/94attendees>, <mailto:94attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/94attendees/>
List-Post: <mailto:94attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:94attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/94attendees>, <mailto:94attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2015 14:36:00 -0000
Lars Eggert writes: > did anyone else have their Intercontinental Yokohama stay post to their IHG > accounts as "non-qualifying?" Me as well, and I the front desk said it was because it was a group rate.
- [94attendees] IHG "Non-qualifying Stay"? Eggert, Lars
- Re: [94attendees] IHG "Non-qualifying Stay"? Henrik Johansson
- Re: [94attendees] IHG "Non-qualifying Stay"? David C Lawrence
- Re: [94attendees] IHG "Non-qualifying Stay"? Samuel Weiler
- Re: [94attendees] IHG "Non-qualifying Stay"? Roberta Maglione (robmgl)
- Re: [94attendees] IHG "Non-qualifying Stay"? Gihan Dias
- Re: [94attendees] IHG "Non-qualifying Stay"? Eggert, Lars
- Re: [94attendees] IHG "Non-qualifying Stay"? Robert Moskowitz
- Re: [94attendees] IHG "Non-qualifying Stay"? ietf
- Re: [94attendees] IHG "Non-qualifying Stay"? Eggert, Lars
- Re: [94attendees] IHG "Non-qualifying Stay"? Roberta Maglione (robmgl)
- Re: [94attendees] IHG "Non-qualifying Stay"? ietf@johnlevine.com
- Re: [94attendees] IHG "Non-qualifying Stay"? Robert Moskowitz
- Re: [94attendees] IHG "Non-qualifying Stay"? Dirk Kutscher
- Re: [94attendees] IHG "Non-qualifying Stay"? Marc Blanchet
- Re: [94attendees] IHG "Non-qualifying Stay"? JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
- Re: [94attendees] IHG "Non-qualifying Stay"? Salz, Rich
- Re: [94attendees] IHG "Non-qualifying Stay"? Samuel Weiler
- Re: [94attendees] IHG "Non-qualifying Stay"? Samuel Weiler
- Re: [94attendees] IHG "Non-qualifying Stay"? Ralph Droms
- Re: [94attendees] IHG "Non-qualifying Stay"? Marc Blanchet
- Re: [94attendees] IHG "Non-qualifying Stay"? JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
- Re: [94attendees] IHG "Non-qualifying Stay"? Ralph Droms
- Re: [94attendees] IHG "Non-qualifying Stay"? Oleg Hahm
- Re: [94attendees] IHG "Non-qualifying Stay"? Deen, Glenn (NBCUniversal)
- Re: [94attendees] IHG "Non-qualifying Stay"? bruno.decraene
- Re: [94attendees] IHG "Non-qualifying Stay"? Bob Hinden
- Re: [94attendees] IHG "Non-qualifying Stay"? michal
- Re: [94attendees] IHG "Non-qualifying Stay"? Jakob Heitz (jheitz)
- Re: [94attendees] IHG "Non-qualifying Stay"? Sean Leonard
- Re: [94attendees] IHG "Non-qualifying Stay"? Eggert, Lars
- Re: [94attendees] IHG "Non-qualifying Stay"? Melinda Shore
- Re: [94attendees] IHG "Non-qualifying Stay"? Carlos M. Martinez
- Re: [94attendees] IHG "Non-qualifying Stay"? Eggert, Lars
- Re: [94attendees] IHG "Non-qualifying Stay"? Sean Leonard
- Re: [94attendees] IHG "Non-qualifying Stay"? Ole Jacobsen
- Re: [94attendees] [IAOC] IHG "Non-qualifying Stay… Tobias Gondrom
- Re: [94attendees] IHG "Non-qualifying Stay"? Andrew Sullivan
- Re: [94attendees] IHG "Non-qualifying Stay"? Bob Hinden
- Re: [94attendees] IHG "Non-qualifying Stay"? Hutton, Andrew