Re: [94attendees] IHG "Non-qualifying Stay"?

Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@gmail.com> Wed, 18 November 2015 18:10 UTC

Return-Path: <bob.hinden@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: 94attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 94attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7CF521A1B1D for <94attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 18 Nov 2015 10:10:10 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PWr7im6tZMsq for <94attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 18 Nov 2015 10:10:09 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-qk0-x22c.google.com (mail-qk0-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c09::22c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 028C51A1B14 for <94attendees@ietf.org>; Wed, 18 Nov 2015 10:10:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: by qkao63 with SMTP id o63so17265287qka.2 for <94attendees@ietf.org>; Wed, 18 Nov 2015 10:10:07 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=subject:mime-version:content-type:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :message-id:references:to; bh=yamY0A8yTjmhqIsJNq+9+XT1umZXwUZBu8iQ4C/lgDU=; b=KWQ1d2RTMtW8eWrAYzds6RmuCiQw7d51OJ7ODWhWItYORvKxn+wmAZncFfEPE7H4Lc 10Nb6ghzVuovoPZkI/wqtva7Nu6vjB5ewGGtLfy6CoRaCd9/44p584wohm5nVEAsXY7k VD45Zsn0KA8mi5Mgxve03afTd96G4ek9Gp0xQGhuryHBCSx704+ZLl41Ee4Mbi7sa1E9 el9NUn5OahBO8jCDOwaWjAXoDfNEPCgUwDJqMFqSMvB4JpeJgvc/bmFaEHxYyJBED/TB 4k3iGAuYrkS0zOy7RBi/3sK7sMad18SON1Guj9NtErytSWRXWMJXMD+tMc3Xnaa/B1ob 5aLA==
X-Received: by 10.55.204.213 with SMTP id n82mr3013930qkl.36.1447870207178; Wed, 18 Nov 2015 10:10:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [10.0.0.24] (c-71-202-19-53.hsd1.ca.comcast.net. [71.202.19.53]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id j106sm1231921qge.3.2015.11.18.10.10.05 (version=TLS1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Wed, 18 Nov 2015 10:10:05 -0800 (PST)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.2 \(2104\))
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_E6051A81-B860-4FD6-8B88-78BA79AB1DAA"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha512
X-Pgp-Agent: GPGMail 2.5.2
From: Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <E63AF10D-B895-4FE0-98C2-BE4BB00C602A@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2015 10:10:02 -0800
Message-Id: <C191C244-245E-4CB8-B86C-54FC51459E63@gmail.com>
References: <E0B9279C-1A3C-4E61-8F7E-6D78B15AA8BA@netapp.com> <22085.62797.741761.727196@tale.kendall.corp.akamai.com> <5e70f48cb49043408ceeeaedebd34f10@XCH-RCD-009.cisco.com> <22311667-3592-4CE4-A65D-DB2A1B90D09A@netapp.com> <82AB329A76E2484D934BBCA77E9F5249A6799E00@PALLENE.office.hd> <alpine.BSF.2.20.1511181126110.55717@fledge.watson.org> <E63AF10D-B895-4FE0-98C2-BE4BB00C602A@gmail.com>
To: Ralph Droms <rdroms.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.2104)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/94attendees/qNM5rLgp0WBkx9-Ldrw4CB7zxaE>
Cc: "94attendees@ietf.org" <94attendees@ietf.org>, Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [94attendees] IHG "Non-qualifying Stay"?
X-BeenThere: 94attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Mailing list of IETF 94 attendees that have opted in on this list. " <94attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/94attendees>, <mailto:94attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/94attendees/>
List-Post: <mailto:94attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:94attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/94attendees>, <mailto:94attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2015 18:10:10 -0000

> On Nov 18, 2015, at 8:31 AM, Ralph Droms <rdroms.ietf@gmail.com>; wrote:
> 
> Speaking strictly for myself, the issue of loyalty program points is completely immaterial to me and I don't want the IAC spending its time on the issue.

Same for me.

Bob