Re: [94attendees] Apple Charging Brick (85w) (lost, or buy option?)

John Braunberger <sloop59@gmail.com> Fri, 06 November 2015 00:33 UTC

Return-Path: <sloop59@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: 94attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 94attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C8871A1B40 for <94attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 5 Nov 2015 16:33:50 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.449
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.449 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Khl8ccMujAIf for <94attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 5 Nov 2015 16:33:49 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-oi0-x22f.google.com (mail-oi0-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c06::22f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B95411A6FD7 for <94attendees@ietf.org>; Thu, 5 Nov 2015 16:33:46 -0800 (PST)
Received: by oiww189 with SMTP id w189so33607052oiw.3 for <94attendees@ietf.org>; Thu, 05 Nov 2015 16:33:46 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=w6fFVhEq9IOn6ISqXy6VZqV1MJiTXC4wYXI+1BE8TKU=; b=MgbmRNO30TsaFr9fMSeeo9ssnbvRDKSG/GqBY3gJqh68AYnU5c2gwEkM+j7xIEmA8m f+h4KIv0bg0n1D4tSOJ/maMLdI7nU455IV2rmIxTQ/5GEpr24pCnOcG4wThoE2lbxepg Nf9sTVZymduGfRqiPsNRCTDFP63di9yIdEncd9R8YTbt9wGf/tfFTmdSGyYNX2vDu4lb +c2oTn1NmHrU69rEs1FJSRX+paFGLKLdOY/+JJ/ODUvZSxaYBCJ+rJanFdzG2vWa40bZ OryjxAfJudN9ceg/tPyA2NGdyrfufwqhs8ZJ7EvD8YL7JrXumSUo0J5BQZk4HPpY/+23 hUHg==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.202.108.79 with SMTP id h76mr6434708oic.47.1446770026139; Thu, 05 Nov 2015 16:33:46 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.202.189.69 with HTTP; Thu, 5 Nov 2015 16:33:46 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <8B018E08-E39B-4522-81EE-64AA65FF17B7@gmail.com>
References: <1831741E-D194-466C-A87E-991A07AF1AED@rakuten.com> <878u6cou6l.fsf@chopps.org> <8B018E08-E39B-4522-81EE-64AA65FF17B7@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2015 16:33:46 -0800
Message-ID: <CAK-JFi8Pf1yQ3FcqzkeZWszMKqzD1EhGfz=r74HqAtOUckS+aw@mail.gmail.com>
From: John Braunberger <sloop59@gmail.com>
To: =?UTF-8?B?0JLQsNGB0LjQu9C40Lkg0JTQvtC70LzQsNGC0L7Qsg==?= <vdolmatov@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a1142e74a7ad4ad0523d465e3
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/94attendees/tMNClg4xgjKBrb8i0iix_LzKTEE>
Cc: attendees <94attendees@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [94attendees] Apple Charging Brick (85w) (lost, or buy option?)
X-BeenThere: 94attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Mailing list of IETF 94 attendees that have opted in on this list. " <94attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/94attendees>, <mailto:94attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/94attendees/>
List-Post: <mailto:94attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:94attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/94attendees>, <mailto:94attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 06 Nov 2015 00:33:50 -0000

There is a Nojima electronics store in the nearby MARK IS building, roughly
600 meters from the conference centre.
It's a good place to try.

On Friday, 6 November 2015, Василий Долматов <vdolmatov@gmail.com> wrote:

>
> > 6 нояб. 2015 г., в 9:20, Christian Hopps <chopps@chopps.org
> <javascript:;>> написал(а):
> >  is there a store nearby that I could purchase a new apple power brick
> for my mac book pro?
> Seconded on that,
> searching for place to buy new Lightning charger cable, mine is gonna  be
> defunct.
>
> dol@
>