Re: [95attendees] hhonors points credited ?

Cj Aronson <cja@daydream.com> Sat, 07 May 2016 15:03 UTC

Return-Path: <cja@daydream.com>
X-Original-To: 95attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 95attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92A4812D4FC for <95attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 7 May 2016 08:03:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=daydream-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hblabdOnNSrt for <95attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 7 May 2016 08:03:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wm0-x234.google.com (mail-wm0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::234]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 72A9F12D1CA for <95attendees@ietf.org>; Sat, 7 May 2016 08:03:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wm0-x234.google.com with SMTP id a17so119506473wme.0 for <95attendees@ietf.org>; Sat, 07 May 2016 08:03:22 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=daydream-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc; bh=I4zefU2qam3JuDaZO3E3UEpLeADnGZrE1jopebgP8fk=; b=JJ+rHb4fvh5ilqdaiM1yJwsvIjiq6R9yGHF/i+2DS6qdnifq1vx3OyzMyDVD4R+0Zb 5BqoQfl1A6iQ+OGKuWRLV1cp7+bSPGClXRrK81FKRgaW1rkEBZn1YfNCGhlH7xtWZ+u2 CxreedADydy1aUHxTO2TmN+0J5Xo0SwG6+sdHP/8xT0fyg1D9oR9C+JhRW6zrIfhxhAw Bwy1c9DapIjiYgFKYaVspBsovcrdgsgBvZBJF8JGVoJ4F6v2XmHvbTr2pyszg+4srEjH y8tBmeL7cLbrvIQoS6fFFvjqLE6UXpbt3AnRb3U3sWgVN/26siCTeyJqpgWJcwitw8my nowQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc; bh=I4zefU2qam3JuDaZO3E3UEpLeADnGZrE1jopebgP8fk=; b=WvP4iHsYh5AysfiKadA3Por3xElOXUI7Fakf6xgmE6vmPayXno8s4xwFQ9d/J+OrDi 930YVtOghomQvbWfXoLF9xnMIGtBSycLJ/OrDLeeb7JJNhusNMU2bFlT2tNuqUPbmasQ 78feARbbECtb5gDCKGCZR0Xb1PBYbat5+W8osCYOqnwXMH9YEJhfHwMaVzCkpCBRkWpR 133wDhlojYzOGKPu9dyKv2vCW/2nf0tGypwdF1iWoxpEUenpx8HZs7UbLfAM/nTYhY6f QFiQoSwTeId/tDVz0ZaUQkNyJWw84eDDsijwL8W3GMWC2AmIjnnQpG5fjAezeIBDtEUx gYpQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOPr4FVyDZzaqJXXXDZx+28aTYhWykdv9/N59G2mCVz8Jajsea++sTJp83xrXjwCXezpzggFYmo/kusWRAzF3Q==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.194.171.66 with SMTP id as2mr25028335wjc.110.1462633400804; Sat, 07 May 2016 08:03:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.194.176.230 with HTTP; Sat, 7 May 2016 08:03:20 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAC6JZKR+7uNkVQqHmZVToNzKTB2M=iBuzsVT_gBu+s7OgOJ8kQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <DM2PR0301MB07172C8907F198A5B36562A9A37C0@DM2PR0301MB0717.namprd03.prod.outlook.com> <0bf84cb9-c1cb-4d8f-9809-ab4ecb9ff6fa@email.android.com> <CAA=duU0o-yUNk=RaCdXnB4kNJ8ZVAM_A2dV4i57QLDW2tJL40g@mail.gmail.com> <3919134B-ACFC-4E47-94E4-27D3349A5AE9@amsl.com> <696DED7C-5E04-4BC4-A674-03DC313849A6@gmail.com> <06861008-AB5B-433B-B262-BA90A210EEC4@amsl.com> <AMXPR07MB2153969ED6228C8EB3D11F1917C0@AMXPR07MB215.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com> <28C01A67-4722-4F9A-B049-0EF2896A8C19@gmail.com> <AD01BD73-CCDD-4B57-9F3F-45D1E0884E3E@nbcuni.com> <B50AEAF9-8A9E-4447-9E32-C1684F21EF2B@nostrum.com> <F9E7D9BB-B246-48C7-BC35-A7AB709A00D1@ogre.com> <CAC6JZKR+7uNkVQqHmZVToNzKTB2M=iBuzsVT_gBu+s7OgOJ8kQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 07 May 2016 09:03:20 -0600
Message-ID: <CAC6JZKRuf9Y252aFiMyEUEpNwOgsrfpq4X=ed5r7PiA__jna5w@mail.gmail.com>
From: Cj Aronson <cja@daydream.com>
To: Leif Hedstrom <leif@ogre.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="089e0122f0544ac369053241e0cd"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/95attendees/NNV07Leb9BR3gZh8XEZXKYu87C4>
Cc: Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com>, "Deen, Glenn" <Glenn.Deen@nbcuni.com>, 95 Attendees <95attendees@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [95attendees] hhonors points credited ?
X-BeenThere: 95attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Mailing list of IETF 95 attendees that have opted in on this list. " <95attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/95attendees>, <mailto:95attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/95attendees/>
List-Post: <mailto:95attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:95attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/95attendees>, <mailto:95attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 07 May 2016 15:03:32 -0000

So this morning I chatted with HIlton again.  The woman took my info, asked
me if I paid or my company paid and then gave me all my points.  I guess
it's the luck of the draw of who you get.

------Cathy


{Ô,Ô}
  (( ))
  ◊  ◊

On Fri, May 6, 2016 at 3:19 PM, Cj Aronson <cja@daydream.com> wrote:

> I just contacted Hilton Honors like Bob Hinden did via chat.  They told me
> my rate didn't qualify for points.  Then she said she'd give me points for
> the inconvenience but she couldn't because the system is down.
>
> -----Cathy
>
>
> {Ô,Ô}
>   (( ))
>   ◊  ◊
>
> On Fri, May 6, 2016 at 9:06 AM, Leif Hedstrom <leif@ogre.com> wrote:
>
>>
>> > On May 6, 2016, at 8:35 AM, Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > That happened to me when I tried earlier (before we had word that
>> points should be forthcoming). The HHonors people said this was completely
>> up to the hotel, and stonewalled on my questions about why the rate I paid
>> was ineligible.
>> >
>> > Is there a specific contact and/or key phrase we need to use?
>>
>>
>> To add on to my previous post (from a while back). First, I never called
>> the hotel directly, I just called Hilton Honors, and they gave me this same
>> story. So I asked to talk to a Manager, explained to her that the IETF does
>> this 2-3 times / year, and that we always get the stays for our status
>> accrual. She added my nights without further questions.
>>
>> — Leif
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> 95attendees mailing list
>> 95attendees@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/95attendees
>>
>
>