Re: [95attendees] hhonors points credited ?

Cj Aronson <cja@daydream.com> Fri, 06 May 2016 21:19 UTC

Return-Path: <cja@daydream.com>
X-Original-To: 95attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 95attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 438C612D125 for <95attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 6 May 2016 14:19:37 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=daydream-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id lCd5odwU_CCA for <95attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 6 May 2016 14:19:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wm0-x22c.google.com (mail-wm0-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::22c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AAC5B12D119 for <95attendees@ietf.org>; Fri, 6 May 2016 14:19:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wm0-x22c.google.com with SMTP id a17so96579830wme.0 for <95attendees@ietf.org>; Fri, 06 May 2016 14:19:34 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=daydream-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc; bh=ga+9E3uKHvn4yhWPAGcDRFoYyh4NqqOIi8QJ1SSYp2U=; b=F1upk6N+gUjuWu+yHL6RTtwY/QvfnmoEJDbMjJDd2IUu3AH7FNIxQYSx1j5u4z+HyV yhXY10FuCkeu4L12tdfXcy/DBfwAYUy4Z8wI6AMg5C1sIc8nbE+xf8OOHZSGy7MKhxY5 1YGNFsPAC3lMrRSRUTqNI1MJC/y0D1ZwKQx0vu+tgEMQpayUJNw2dLo7R2fVEiPBiQAs NeIvN+518RvJGZXMgUzfNl/RajdBvIx41XPvY4FjON5yBN8FBogJh3QCAyOHoA+H5qi4 PRVD7p2p+032Rxvb+gN3w/bqVp6ewziqDiAxOoIJQRh/9G20rKjqnDA/wajNhSUqsQ44 0/Xg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc; bh=ga+9E3uKHvn4yhWPAGcDRFoYyh4NqqOIi8QJ1SSYp2U=; b=bFP5FNZZGCXIXJ6Hyp2lP12+/ZyT1+OgjOqeXov7jvUVCdXoyyWHDpYKFate53o5tZ a7eBg0Ta3iHqgojvNr7qfTUnC6+p6mw6YhQdhWPNUwpjdqbC1x1b7AkTGQnsf8+L9rEg RAxSzjDzcvCOCdYe0H/UfvOSlkCdtUZoAyZkqxpEl9jpE9Y5qTzZOeZKbfqBOhEIdkjR CwOt2cBojsZuX8S2ZHcDPcdfcwkYWeTw/CH6v4lM2Lgi9gR6KMFvj7SqdZIPymmkTTf9 rYMOFZz8lX7Y8oJqXpzabnKO28QuOcizddAhh0pWt2yvL8VsFxb2QBTB1GfvEX/x0tNd ZaNQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOPr4FUug1AT0gEyNdQQ84m9xmPcCfcTgCEEQcjhAEpng4Pp0Z5Znr4SHtX4zJwhAu4Inio4SUMuNZ1alA/OLA==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.194.116.103 with SMTP id jv7mr23597719wjb.22.1462569573074; Fri, 06 May 2016 14:19:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.194.176.230 with HTTP; Fri, 6 May 2016 14:19:32 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <F9E7D9BB-B246-48C7-BC35-A7AB709A00D1@ogre.com>
References: <DM2PR0301MB07172C8907F198A5B36562A9A37C0@DM2PR0301MB0717.namprd03.prod.outlook.com> <0bf84cb9-c1cb-4d8f-9809-ab4ecb9ff6fa@email.android.com> <CAA=duU0o-yUNk=RaCdXnB4kNJ8ZVAM_A2dV4i57QLDW2tJL40g@mail.gmail.com> <3919134B-ACFC-4E47-94E4-27D3349A5AE9@amsl.com> <696DED7C-5E04-4BC4-A674-03DC313849A6@gmail.com> <06861008-AB5B-433B-B262-BA90A210EEC4@amsl.com> <AMXPR07MB2153969ED6228C8EB3D11F1917C0@AMXPR07MB215.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com> <28C01A67-4722-4F9A-B049-0EF2896A8C19@gmail.com> <AD01BD73-CCDD-4B57-9F3F-45D1E0884E3E@nbcuni.com> <B50AEAF9-8A9E-4447-9E32-C1684F21EF2B@nostrum.com> <F9E7D9BB-B246-48C7-BC35-A7AB709A00D1@ogre.com>
Date: Fri, 06 May 2016 15:19:32 -0600
Message-ID: <CAC6JZKR+7uNkVQqHmZVToNzKTB2M=iBuzsVT_gBu+s7OgOJ8kQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Cj Aronson <cja@daydream.com>
To: Leif Hedstrom <leif@ogre.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a1130ca48dcdec50532330376"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/95attendees/YmZ7voeen3NdS-yuJNzXwrldYcI>
Cc: Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com>, "Deen, Glenn" <Glenn.Deen@nbcuni.com>, 95 Attendees <95attendees@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [95attendees] hhonors points credited ?
X-BeenThere: 95attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Mailing list of IETF 95 attendees that have opted in on this list. " <95attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/95attendees>, <mailto:95attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/95attendees/>
List-Post: <mailto:95attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:95attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/95attendees>, <mailto:95attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 06 May 2016 21:19:37 -0000

I just contacted Hilton Honors like Bob Hinden did via chat.  They told me
my rate didn't qualify for points.  Then she said she'd give me points for
the inconvenience but she couldn't because the system is down.

-----Cathy


{Ô,Ô}
  (( ))
  ◊  ◊

On Fri, May 6, 2016 at 9:06 AM, Leif Hedstrom <leif@ogre.com> wrote:

>
> > On May 6, 2016, at 8:35 AM, Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com> wrote:
> >
> > That happened to me when I tried earlier (before we had word that points
> should be forthcoming). The HHonors people said this was completely up to
> the hotel, and stonewalled on my questions about why the rate I paid was
> ineligible.
> >
> > Is there a specific contact and/or key phrase we need to use?
>
>
> To add on to my previous post (from a while back). First, I never called
> the hotel directly, I just called Hilton Honors, and they gave me this same
> story. So I asked to talk to a Manager, explained to her that the IETF does
> this 2-3 times / year, and that we always get the stays for our status
> accrual. She added my nights without further questions.
>
> — Leif
>
> _______________________________________________
> 95attendees mailing list
> 95attendees@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/95attendees
>