IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [95attendees] hhonors points credited ?

"ietf@johnlevine.com" <ietf@johnlevine.com> Sun, 24 April 2016 21:58 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf@johnlevine.com>
X-Original-To: 95attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 95attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6885412B04A for <95attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 24 Apr 2016 14:58:51 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.001
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.001 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1536-bit key) header.d=iecc.com header.b=ZePHLPXx; dkim=pass (1536-bit key) header.d=johnlevine.com header.b=l2VtaOAs
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0sHIOxjeaKyd for <95attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 24 Apr 2016 14:58:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from miucha.iecc.com (abusenet-1-pt.tunnel.tserv4.nyc4.ipv6.he.net [IPv6:2001:470:1f06:1126::2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1698412D0BB for <95attendees@ietf.org>; Sun, 24 Apr 2016 14:58:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 7640 invoked from network); 24 Apr 2016 21:58:49 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=iecc.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type:user-agent; s=1dd7.571d4199.k1604; bh=FVQuYBWYgqKnL04Qya8XrfA6DpvGQ07xA/dhKHdaLH4=; b=ZePHLPXxdSjbMkDXNycRJwLjLQVjnfjUX5z7GsjRlXqO9fNt3fjXpJjzvE9nLJXN70a5Nl3n99Wq9XnRNkGEPAyfNeBXc74pS4MVpGaJMSw51tTiWQwBz1KAYO0oud4eJ0TkdpNDP+q9wkfcZrRXS9UgXtktoJ7d7WI5AXE0tBb4uWPAsNL/Aa4JBwwwCZ4gETLWrzvn/C3MfhrTMKbzdGhmM08c4m/ZC/uNYZ+gWKfORIyz2AZwcSwZz7kTfRdV
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=johnlevine.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type:user-agent; s=1dd7.571d4199.k1604; bh=FVQuYBWYgqKnL04Qya8XrfA6DpvGQ07xA/dhKHdaLH4=; b=l2VtaOAslacp8R11+VRHj6kNIHXurywxRS65Gnyo6G4VH5NDcbwX4rlvIjZA0AoBGEL941tPpV6A+XeQTZbsr6yhHepLPf0CZ0/VyfGE/UT/ZUG95SQOnIA/zMrz7odg7tYARCuiJsw4u+x2p3Winegw1NJFPWeW8s443DkgCJawpqlxR/k2faTUXQJ88Fq4bK8zwm3QJ7j19ARtDS/7lEBUe0W6f1Aj0ya3y7LRjIBRflYAA2N7TXW4W6cRXHtS
Received: from localhost ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) by imap.iecc.com ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) with ESMTPS (TLS1.0/X.509/SHA1) via TCP6; 24 Apr 2016 21:58:48 -0000
Date: Sun, 24 Apr 2016 17:58:48 -0400
Message-ID: <alpine.OSX.2.11.1604241757070.94971@ary.lan>
From: "ietf@johnlevine.com" <ietf@johnlevine.com>
To: Tim Chown <Tim.Chown@jisc.ac.uk>
In-Reply-To: <4B57B278-1A8F-46AC-8D27-6A33A4FEC70F@jisc.ac.uk>
References: <20160424205739.39450.qmail@ary.lan> <4B57B278-1A8F-46AC-8D27-6A33A4FEC70F@jisc.ac.uk>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.11 (OSX 23 2013-08-11)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: MULTIPART/MIXED; BOUNDARY="0-1186146394-1461535128=:94971"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/95attendees/v7TxR5y09pH6p8AQcKSs_ktt6jY>
Cc: "95attendees@ietf.org" <95attendees@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [95attendees] hhonors points credited ?
X-BeenThere: 95attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Mailing list of IETF 95 attendees that have opted in on this list. " <95attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/95attendees>, <mailto:95attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/95attendees/>
List-Post: <mailto:95attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:95attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/95attendees>, <mailto:95attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Apr 2016 21:58:51 -0000

>> Same here.  The points are nice, but they're like a 1% rebate so
>> they're not worth making a lot of effort.
>
> Sure, but we’ve received Hilton points in the past for our IETF bookings, so why not this time?

Looking at my hhonors statements, it appears that I've gotten points for 
meetings in the US, not for meetings (not just IETF) elsewhere.

Regards,
John Levine, hostmaster@iecc.com
(and hostmaster of about 100 other domains)

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email