Re: [96attendees] Please stop killing trees with pre-printed agendas

Tom Pusateri <pusateri@bangj.com> Mon, 25 July 2016 11:53 UTC

Return-Path: <pusateri@bangj.com>
X-Original-To: 96attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 96attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF7BA12D7E9; Mon, 25 Jul 2016 04:53:07 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id d9Ikf8a2HyFk; Mon, 25 Jul 2016 04:53:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from oj.bangj.com (amt0.gin.ntt.net [129.250.11.170]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 184FD12D7E0; Mon, 25 Jul 2016 04:53:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from butte-1844.mountain2sea.com (69-77-155-155.static.skybest.com [69.77.155.155]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by oj.bangj.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 24D8A112F; Mon, 25 Jul 2016 07:52:38 -0400 (EDT)
From: Tom Pusateri <pusateri@bangj.com>
Message-Id: <B5B678DA-8C91-4B0A-9CF8-005466CBDA36@bangj.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_0C34435A-C9A3-4661-8C82-9CFEE73CC677"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.0 \(3200\))
Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2016 07:53:03 -0400
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1607251119250.2309@uplift.swm.pp.se>
To: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se>
References: <ccb7d8cc-4a16-eb5d-c430-c76f659ac5fe@nostrum.com> <201607211258.u6LCwUkw003270@givry.fdupont.fr> <20160721133047.GA11213@hobbykeller.org> <C77B8B15-BDC0-498D-A59A-6719F8E0D10C@juniper.net> <alpine.DEB.2.02.1607221037020.2309@uplift.swm.pp.se> <13722063-82F0-405B-AE1A-7A45DC2DBD4A@bangj.com> <CAJt_5Ei2K2CvxFqikugZmHOwR+snpifJ7OV=PygxLhvAyOWgXA@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.DEB.2.02.1607251114560.2309@uplift.swm.pp.se> <alpine.DEB.2.02.1607251119250.2309@uplift.swm.pp.se>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3200)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/96attendees/qrzbfMNdm155HDJp08fdsZ58LOs>
Cc: "96attendees@ietf.org" <96attendees@ietf.org>, "ietf@ietf.org" <ietf@ietf.org>, Pat Thaler <pat.thaler@broadcom.com>
Subject: Re: [96attendees] Please stop killing trees with pre-printed agendas
X-BeenThere: 96attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: <96attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/96attendees>, <mailto:96attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/96attendees/>
List-Post: <mailto:96attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:96attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/96attendees>, <mailto:96attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2016 11:53:08 -0000

> On Jul 25, 2016, at 5:21 AM, Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se> wrote:
> 
> On Mon, 25 Jul 2016, Mikael Abrahamsson wrote:
> 
>> On Sun, 24 Jul 2016, Pat Thaler wrote:
>> 
>>> Both the AQM and Transport Area Working Group displayed on my iPhone (as did other cases of two groups meeting in the same slot/room.
>> 
>> http://imgur.com/a/uyhcG is what it looks like on my screen (just made that screen shot).
>> 
>> The web agenda says for the friday 10-12 slot (https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/96/agenda.html):
>> 
>> Bellevue	tsv	aqm	Active Queue Management and Packet Scheduling Shared slot with TSVWG - Moved from Friday 12:20
>> Bellevue	tsv	tsvwg	Transport Area Working Group
>> 
>> So it's probably as Tom stated, there are now two meeting scheduled in the same room for the same time, instead of having two slots (10-11 and 11-12) with two different sessions in the same room.
> 
> I just realised that on my phone, it shows tsvwg at 10-12 and AQM at 1220-1320. After switching to IETF95 and then to IETF96 again, it does indeed show both meetings along each other, correctly.
> 
> So I guess my app didn't have the scheduling change.
> 

Yes, there are still some lingering sync problems. From the screenshot, the blank entry at the top is a symptom of syncing trouble. I hope to have that resolved with either a new API or better error handling for the next meeting. The app isn’t reacting well to timeouts and 403 errors.

Thanks,
Tom