IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [97attendees] The glass elevators are not better

Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer+ietf@nic.fr> Mon, 14 November 2016 22:26 UTC

Return-Path: <bortzmeyer+ietf@nic.fr>
X-Original-To: 97attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 97attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 561241295D6 for <97attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 14 Nov 2016 14:26:22 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Taxih34ep0K7 for <97attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 14 Nov 2016 14:26:19 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.bortzmeyer.org (aetius.bortzmeyer.org [IPv6:2001:4b98:dc0:41:216:3eff:fece:1902]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3B53312962F for <97attendees@ietf.org>; Mon, 14 Nov 2016 14:26:19 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail.bortzmeyer.org (Postfix, from userid 10) id 7F5D531C85; Mon, 14 Nov 2016 23:26:17 +0100 (CET)
Received: by godin (Postfix, from userid 1000) id D42D7EC0B27; Mon, 14 Nov 2016 23:17:22 +0100 (CET)
Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2016 07:17:22 +0900
From: Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer+ietf@nic.fr>
To: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
Message-ID: <20161114221722.GB16512@laperouse.bortzmeyer.org>
References: <a29dc956-ccb6-c493-7323-6bc46ca09d47@nostrum.com> <26345.1479134011@dooku.sandelman.ca>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <26345.1479134011@dooku.sandelman.ca>
X-Transport: UUCP rules
X-Operating-System: Ubuntu 16.04 (xenial)
X-Charlie: Je suis Charlie
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/97attendees/0HuY5jo3SSfIOt0_kGLXoO7gRmQ>
Cc: 97attendees@ietf.org, Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com>
Subject: Re: [97attendees] The glass elevators are not better
X-BeenThere: 97attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Mailing list of IETF 97 attendees that have opted in on this list." <97attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/97attendees>, <mailto:97attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/97attendees/>
List-Post: <mailto:97attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:97attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/97attendees>, <mailto:97attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2016 22:26:22 -0000

On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 11:33:31PM +0900,
 Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> wrote 
 a message of 63 lines which said:

> They aren't largely unused: they seem mostly congested, and there is
> some difficulty figuring out which elevator is coming, because the
> "ding" light often changes from while one is waiting.  People wait a
> long time for one,

Fully agree. The advice in the subject was quite misleading.

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email