IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [97attendees] Elevator weight limits?

Dennis Kort <dk@allnetwork.de> Tue, 15 November 2016 00:46 UTC

Return-Path: <dk@allnetwork.de>
X-Original-To: 97attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 97attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 231FE129592 for <97attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 14 Nov 2016 16:46:38 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.498
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.498 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.497, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=allnetwork.de
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0BCuN3T9hQUO for <97attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 14 Nov 2016 16:46:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.allnetwork.de (mail.allnetwork.de [IPv6:2a01:4f8:173:20a7::2cc3]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 713CB12957F for <97attendees@ietf.org>; Mon, 14 Nov 2016 16:46:36 -0800 (PST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=allnetwork.de; s=allnetwork.de; t=1479170794; bh=M6VUC6hN/uJ1M3NF8SgJKUY/OBYSf/dV4cXU+vBzFmM=; h=Content-Type:Mime-Version:Subject:From:Content-Transfer-Encoding: To; b=HqJ40p75LdDyoHTXQso9cUVyFpLx/7fnblZ6A/Ivq18u5M17Rsly1K5dDclkAZLrn FDmWxXgqGkVflepHChWOq8mqKroo1WD5K84X5vh/mPqm+W3m2M9zz6lhmG1wG7DoVt p0jt5YQZSsbh0CIeAm3/NArc8SEShit6TYQvBfjA=
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Apple-Base-Url: x-msg://4/
X-Universally-Unique-Identifier: CB1462F3-1A7B-474A-B9E3-4634489D5B14
X-Apple-Mail-Remote-Attachments: YES
X-Apple-Mail-Plain-Text-Draft: yes
From: Dennis Kort <dk@allnetwork.de>
In-Reply-To: <677418F6-35EF-4A33-8C2A-1C3CA709D98B@sunet.se>
X-Apple-Windows-Friendly: 1
Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2016 09:46:34 +0900
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <19A2F482-6EAC-4E62-B574-EA99F2C7A5A9@allnetwork.de>
References: <677418F6-35EF-4A33-8C2A-1C3CA709D98B@sunet.se>
X-Uniform-Type-Identifier: com.apple.mail-draft
To: 97attendees@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/97attendees/0ODChsdOBcckD50t-cdm8p4UffY>
Subject: Re: [97attendees] Elevator weight limits?
X-BeenThere: 97attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Mailing list of IETF 97 attendees that have opted in on this list." <97attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/97attendees>, <mailto:97attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/97attendees/>
List-Post: <mailto:97attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:97attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/97attendees>, <mailto:97attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2016 00:46:38 -0000

I was in that elevator as well (around 18:00). It did not seem to be overloaded, more like a system error. The elevator direction was displayed as down, but it had more floors for up selected. The staff appeared to have experienced that problem before. Sometimes elevators seem to get cancelled?


> On Nov 15, 2016, at 08:49, Leif Johansson <leifj@sunet.se> wrote:
> 
> 
> Yesterday one of the glass elevators started to buzz after we managed to get the doors closed. 
> 
> The group started to peel off people by the handful but the elevator seemed stuck. I didn't have time to stick around for the root cause analysis but I'm curious...  Is there a weight limit on the elevators that we are hitting?
> 
>  Cheers Leif
> 
> _______________________________________________
> 97attendees mailing list
> 97attendees@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/97attendees

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email