IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [97attendees] Online IETF97 agenda no longer links to the individual session agendas

John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com> Mon, 14 November 2016 15:27 UTC

Return-Path: <john-ietf@jck.com>
X-Original-To: 97attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 97attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3A1C1297EB for <97attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 14 Nov 2016 07:27:46 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id CX3ni52xhFJE for <97attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 14 Nov 2016 07:27:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: from bsa3.jck.com (static-65-175-133-137.cpe.metrocast.net [65.175.133.137]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 903621297CF for <97attendees@ietf.org>; Mon, 14 Nov 2016 07:27:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: from hp5.int.jck.com ([198.252.137.153] helo=JcK-HP5.jck.com) by bsa3.jck.com with esmtp (Exim 4.82 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <john-ietf@jck.com>) id 1c6JAd-0005kW-1j; Mon, 14 Nov 2016 10:27:43 -0500
Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2016 10:27:38 -0500
From: John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com>
To: "HANSEN, TONY L" <tony@att.com>
Message-ID: <B8C21528D8E0D60B0C7014A8@JcK-HP5.jck.com>
In-Reply-To: <F133A560-1532-46AA-B093-7A2EDD2B8308@att.com>
References: <e0adc83751504b5bbd36d71d54a74f71@HE105662.emea1.cds.t-internal.com> <19C29B86-A33D-447B-BFD7-DA4F308B3044@live555.com> <20161114052438.GE86797@kduck.kaduk.org> <E86CE37D-E2A3-44EB-9813-753F07E21E02@live555.com> <F133A560-1532-46AA-B093-7A2EDD2B8308@att.com>
X-Mailer: Mulberry/4.0.8 (Win32)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/97attendees/10-KzF0_bGm9aL5T6yvI--oGkAw>
Cc: 97attendees@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [97attendees] Online IETF97 agenda no longer links to the individual session agendas
X-BeenThere: 97attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Mailing list of IETF 97 attendees that have opted in on this list." <97attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/97attendees>, <mailto:97attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/97attendees/>
List-Post: <mailto:97attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:97attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/97attendees>, <mailto:97attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2016 15:27:46 -0000


--On Monday, November 14, 2016 3:03 PM +0000 "HANSEN, TONY L"
<tony@att.com> wrote:

> The tools version predates the datatracker version, and still
> has some experimental items not part of the datatracker
> version.

Tony,

I don't know if that is the answer to the question Ross intended
to ask, but having two different HTML-format agendas floating
around with a disjoint set of features is a large source of
confusion and extra work/difficulty for participants.  It is a
special problem for those of us who are remote and therefore
need to be able to track a lot of the relevant information.

So, can the Tools Team and the Secretariat please get together
and make a plan for one agenda that incorporates all of the
features?  If we have to have two in order to experiment with
new features, can the Tools Team please consider it a
requirement to keep the experimental one a functional superset
of the official / Secretariat one?

thanks,
    john

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email