Re: [97attendees] Conrad rooms hot?

"Andrew G. Malis" <agmalis@gmail.com> Sun, 13 November 2016 03:12 UTC

Return-Path: <agmalis@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: 97attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 97attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C54A9129543 for <97attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 12 Nov 2016 19:12:19 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.698
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.698 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DIET_1=0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9IaUIrQR0T_d for <97attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 12 Nov 2016 19:12:18 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-oi0-x22e.google.com (mail-oi0-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c06::22e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 29E85129462 for <97attendees@ietf.org>; Sat, 12 Nov 2016 19:12:17 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-oi0-x22e.google.com with SMTP id 128so26752219oih.0 for <97attendees@ietf.org>; Sat, 12 Nov 2016 19:12:17 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=cgCNEV4T+ijky6oYYfT4UIvsrccrcKr4t7ruYTU1MmI=; b=Cae+fHbqKsmrgZdp3wI0xBgXoTT/Em+va2aSpcnV433bvXUfJZ2cey2vZvdOwV+rxl M8RkfOtaUKCq48agomJ08zvL+kJkpGF8TQRkvCqAxONajolcwTFZCkXG8m3wzlGp0Rnk /WZXGCfzB0lfy8m9VlXc5iizILMOZ/7DPjzvpZV3/ojf5s/Mo6KZ7uP/2gwKwC1FNCXH 0ZWTm3rIKZ37L41jsGm/Svm/eTOILXo7rzw8nEcIR2MQFHqUTLm59zurug1oJYe7u2vY iCwLKWHh8XZk5/w1Cvw3GB4JUHAqk8RVWCyKG0GnsRCoTOLD86yh8UXP0NSt32nKZOIn XF/Q==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=cgCNEV4T+ijky6oYYfT4UIvsrccrcKr4t7ruYTU1MmI=; b=DFUGjr3ADCwVSTVfukRFJ0PLJDbVhYiNMSX+ylp5FYVAx0trstcHRspVgqchHdZr8J JEcIjd+ZMQ+Xwmj6NPpucXEgSES+vU7rZzvj8kJDfKM/Jqpe6z9nJhTmyWw/AlmBXkE6 XCAD8u+V+gNezI4rgJP9+ytOKgOSlSW8LJPEcUSlp2L0sLQqQr9SeKtCBYbXNEAbV+gm al6WvVoH8RmDS6QgfqVJHBQVL+EIdlzTh+m6Ua/em3pMmCge37P5S0PZ8Pm/gizAIvLy 9qkKxyyVE4tDxeryJhgky1hhhBsTXRmXd6S/IeddIOubMyqrD+jvuEJYUoKMMlqgfXJg YLig==
X-Gm-Message-State: ABUngveg5gofxIW1lcxm6qFPlfReL+i6wnJThNu7dFj2nKhAVqD30lKqsrWu9sDzQie2D0gmbO27jy7F/hjptQ==
X-Received: by 10.202.89.194 with SMTP id n185mr1799166oib.6.1479006737327; Sat, 12 Nov 2016 19:12:17 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.182.15.105 with HTTP; Sat, 12 Nov 2016 19:11:56 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <63BE99DC-A11C-459B-AEF7-1BDE776F6BEE@nostrum.com>
References: <CAHw9_i+UjXMXGmHjxipFNBLS00kZLJkqH=gyxniz21qFPtokLw@mail.gmail.com> <63BE99DC-A11C-459B-AEF7-1BDE776F6BEE@nostrum.com>
From: "Andrew G. Malis" <agmalis@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 12 Nov 2016 22:11:56 -0500
Message-ID: <CAA=duU2hQQJTZrSQr6aeDO3iQmK5mq0YzSCsk6DU_ORqCcXQew@mail.gmail.com>
To: Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a113d32a832ede90541261761
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/97attendees/1XGtLxrIysZP9Kk4EaEh1JLynEc>
Cc: 97attendees@ietf.org, Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net>
Subject: Re: [97attendees] Conrad rooms hot?
X-BeenThere: 97attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Mailing list of IETF 97 attendees that have opted in on this list." <97attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/97attendees>, <mailto:97attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/97attendees/>
List-Post: <mailto:97attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:97attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/97attendees>, <mailto:97attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 13 Nov 2016 03:12:20 -0000

Same experience as Ben. I put it down to 21 earlier and it got too cool,
I’ve now got it at 22 and that’s quite comfortable.


On Sat, Nov 12, 2016 at 6:55 PM, Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com> wrote:

> Mine was hot on arrival (set to 24), and it did not get better if I
> lowered the set point by a small increment. A larger increment kicked it
> into cool mode, and it has been pleasant 21-21.5 since.
>
>
> On 13 Nov 2016, at 8:42, Warren Kumari wrote:
>
> First!
>>
>> More seriously, has anyone found their hotel guest room too hot? I've
>> got the AC bumped all the way to cold (and have tried without it on as
>> well), and my room still feels overly warm.
>> Perhaps if I lost some weight that would help, but...
>>
>> W
>>
>> --
>> I don't think the execution is relevant when it was obviously a bad
>> idea in the first place.
>> This is like putting rabid weasels in your pants, and later expressing
>> regret at having chosen those particular rabid weasels and that pair
>> of pants.
>>    ---maf
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> 97attendees mailing list
>> 97attendees@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/97attendees
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> 97attendees mailing list
> 97attendees@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/97attendees
>