Re: [97attendees] meetecho from remote participant perspective

Should we consider deprecating jabber? I confess that I did not even bother
launching my client, as the meetecho chat works so well.

Regards,

Dan

On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 9:37 AM, Tim Chown <Tim.Chown@jisc.ac.uk> wrote:

> It’s very good.
>
> I suspect very few people are now using Jabber, with most joining directly
> to Meetecho. It would be interesting to see stats, if available.
>
> Tim
>
>
>
> On 15 Nov 2016, at 07:35, Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk> wrote:
>
> I'd like to echo Dan's thanks.
>
> In the space of just a few meetings MeetEcho has gone from an experimental
> prototype to a regular and accepted part of the meetings.
>
> The only thing I find missing is that some chairs are unfamiliar with the
> system. We probably need to arrange a small amount of playing to get them
> over that hurdle.
>
> Adrian
>
> *From:* 97attendees [mailto:97attendees-bounces@ietf.org
> <97attendees-bounces@ietf.org>] *On Behalf Of *Dan Romascanu
> *Sent:* 15 November 2016 07:31
> *To:* 97attendees@ietf.org
> *Subject:* [97attendees] meetecho from remote participant perspective
>
>
> It's my first time using meetecho as remote participant. My experience is
> very good so far. I actually find it easier to make comments or ask
> questions as remote participant than in the room! Thursday I will co-chair
> a WG meeting remotely, let's see how this will work.
>
> Thanks to the team!
>
> Dan
> _______________________________________________
> 97attendees mailing list
> 97attendees@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/97attendees
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> 97attendees mailing list
> 97attendees@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/97attendees
>
>