Re: [97attendees] Protests in Seoul
Alexandre PETRESCU <alexandre.petrescu@cea.fr> Sun, 06 November 2016 21:27 UTC
Return-Path: <alexandre.petrescu@cea.fr>
X-Original-To: 97attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 97attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8F9C129989
for <97attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 6 Nov 2016 13:27:25 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -8.396
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.396 tagged_above=-999 required=5
tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5,
RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.497] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44])
by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id gnkkCKQ4YiNr for <97attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>;
Sun, 6 Nov 2016 13:27:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: from cirse-out.extra.cea.fr (cirse-out.extra.cea.fr
[132.167.192.142])
(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0F283129985
for <97attendees@ietf.org>; Sun, 6 Nov 2016 13:27:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: from pisaure.intra.cea.fr (pisaure.intra.cea.fr [132.166.88.21])
by cirse.extra.cea.fr (8.15.2/8.15.2/CEAnet-Internet-out-2.4) with ESMTP id
uA6LRKnR015840
for <97attendees@ietf.org>; Sun, 6 Nov 2016 22:27:20 +0100
Received: from pisaure.intra.cea.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by localhost (Postfix) with SMTP id 96907200E95
for <97attendees@ietf.org>; Sun, 6 Nov 2016 22:27:20 +0100 (CET)
Received: from muguet1.intra.cea.fr (muguet1.intra.cea.fr [132.166.192.6])
by pisaure.intra.cea.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88B59200E4E
for <97attendees@ietf.org>; Sun, 6 Nov 2016 22:27:20 +0100 (CET)
Received: from [132.166.84.40] ([132.166.84.40])
by muguet1.intra.cea.fr (8.15.2/8.15.2/CEAnet-Intranet-out-1.4) with ESMTP id
uA6LRJ4d017204
for <97attendees@ietf.org>; Sun, 6 Nov 2016 22:27:19 +0100
To: 97attendees@ietf.org
References: <CAKe6YvMSU5Zq=V-49wyJ6-mh6fbAvtX1DPCaNrQdHrUwrazkMg@mail.gmail.com>
<543DB8C3-A97B-41F8-A80C-9B3FF7D8CC3C@gmail.com>
<071D134D-07B1-43E8-A5CF-224E22834F0E@compia.com>
<F01F7579-E4D5-4CD9-96AC-364CF808EB2D@gmail.com>
From: Alexandre PETRESCU <alexandre.petrescu@cea.fr>
Organization: CEA
Message-ID: <d8ab6773-83b3-ffc0-7653-93ac76b7da63@cea.fr>
Date: Sun, 6 Nov 2016 22:27:18 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101
Thunderbird/45.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <F01F7579-E4D5-4CD9-96AC-364CF808EB2D@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature";
micalg=sha-256; boundary="------------ms040605000904080205070402"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/97attendees/BFQ2sU-SnEuBKpFthr0JYeMbI74>
Subject: Re: [97attendees] Protests in Seoul
X-BeenThere: 97attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Mailing list of IETF 97 attendees that have opted in on this list."
<97attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/97attendees>,
<mailto:97attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/97attendees/>
List-Post: <mailto:97attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:97attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/97attendees>,
<mailto:97attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 06 Nov 2016 21:27:26 -0000
During the SF IETF meeting protest was against Iraq invasion, March 2002(?). The protest during IETF in Yokohama was about public function jobs, November 2015. youtu.be/Li15Prw_Jko Protests happened during IETF in Prague, Paris and presumably many others. No problems to IETF participants that I can recall either. On another hand, earlier I was positively surprised in S Korea military people in public areas wear uniform even if not in service. There seemed to be less risk than in other capitals where uniforms show up only if on duty. I wonder whether it is still the case... Alex Le 05/11/2016 à 23:12, Margaret Cullen a écrit : > There was a huge, non-violent protest going on during one of the IETFs in San Francisco, and it caused no problems for the IETF, as I recall. Hopefully the same will be true of peaceful protests in Seoul. > > Margaret > > >> On Nov 5, 2016, at 5:08 PM, Via Pesquet <via@compia.com> wrote: >> >> Hi. I think the mass protest that happened on Saturday (Nov. 5 KST) was held at the Gwanghwamun Square. It's a bit far from Conrad Hotel. You'd have to cross the Han River to get to the hotel from the square. There are smaller protests in other areas but I don't think it's something that we should worry about. >> >> Cheers, >> Via Pesquet >> Netpia >> >>> On 5 Nov 2016, at 20:26, Yoav Nir <ynir.ietf@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> Seoul is a capital cities. Protests against the government are a constant feature of most capital cities (South Korea’s neighbor to the north is an obvious exception). >>> >>> I wouldn’t worry about it. >>> >>> Yoav >>> >>>> On 5 Nov 2016, at 11:25, Vinayak Hegde <vinayakh@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> I just read an article on Reuters about large scale protests at Seoul >>>> against the government. Does anyone know what areas these are >>>> affecting ? Are they likely to get violent or peter out by the time we >>>> meet ? Can someone from South Korea please comment. >>>> >>>> http://www.reuters.com/article/us-southkorea-politics-idUSKCN12T08V >>>> >>>> Thanks >>>> Vinayak >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> 97attendees mailing list >>>> 97attendees@ietf.org >>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/97attendees >>> _______________________________________________ >>> 97attendees mailing list >>> 97attendees@ietf.org >>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/97attendees >> _______________________________________________ >> 97attendees mailing list >> 97attendees@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/97attendees > _______________________________________________ > 97attendees mailing list > 97attendees@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/97attendees
- [97attendees] Protests in Seoul Vinayak Hegde
- Re: [97attendees] Protests in Seoul Vinayak Hegde
- Re: [97attendees] Protests in Seoul Randy Bush
- Re: [97attendees] Protests in Seoul =?EUC-KR?B?S0ogU3Vu?=
- Re: [97attendees] Protests in Seoul Stephane Bortzmeyer
- Re: [97attendees] Protests in Seoul Ted Lemon
- Re: [97attendees] Protests in Seoul Yoav Nir
- Re: [97attendees] Protests in Seoul Via Pesquet
- Re: [97attendees] Protests in Seoul Randy Bush
- Re: [97attendees] Protests in Seoul Margaret Cullen
- Re: [97attendees] Protests in Seoul Yoav Nir
- Re: [97attendees] Protests in Seoul Carlos Marcelo Martinez Cagnazzo
- Re: [97attendees] Protests in Seoul Robert Moskowitz
- Re: [97attendees] Protests in Seoul Bob Hinden
- Re: [97attendees] Protests in Seoul Carlos Marcelo Martinez Cagnazzo
- Re: [97attendees] Protests in Seoul Alexandre PETRESCU
- Re: [97attendees] Protests in Seoul Jean Ryu
- Re: [97attendees] Protests in Seoul Jim Reid
- Re: [97attendees] Protests in Seoul Michael Richardson
- Re: [97attendees] Protests in Seoul Yoav Nir
- Re: [97attendees] Protests in Seoul Stephane Bortzmeyer
- Re: [97attendees] Protests in Seoul David Gaamuwa
- Re: [97attendees] Protests in Seoul Stephane Bortzmeyer
- Re: [97attendees] Protests in Seoul Spencer Dawkins at IETF
- Re: [97attendees] Protests in Seoul Walter Pienciak
- Re: [97attendees] Protests in Seoul Alexandre PETRESCU