IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [97attendees] meetecho from remote participant perspective

"Rosen, Brian" <Brian.Rosen@neustar.biz> Tue, 15 November 2016 08:05 UTC

Return-Path: <prvs=412776600a=brian.rosen@neustar.biz>
X-Original-To: 97attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 97attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D7CF129560 for <97attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 15 Nov 2016 00:05:56 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=neustar.biz
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TCUGGQJ6laFU for <97attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 15 Nov 2016 00:05:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx0b-0018ba01.pphosted.com (mx0a-0018ba01.pphosted.com [67.231.149.94]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 90A511288B8 for <97attendees@ietf.org>; Tue, 15 Nov 2016 00:05:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: from pps.filterd (m0078664.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-0018ba01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.17/8.16.0.17) with SMTP id uAF83Km5012760; Tue, 15 Nov 2016 03:05:53 -0500
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=neustar.biz; h=from : to : cc : subject : date : message-id : references : in-reply-to : content-type : mime-version; s=neustar-biz; bh=EcGE0KTYYLXeDT3iv9t3pwMqpPc3jjgj08g6qqfQr/Y=; b=km8QIvlbFjV9ByWnQyfreZYCs+TqxgsgEUMGXsD89J7AqFtvCcAt8GUmeZAeO6nrgoGW 6wJ6EMODMUzrGO5CvyY8nYk/pL7sFnIivMGR6btJCJoPdvR7n38DLjDpsc/W92QtYv+S KNGPSC/VR3zsIal49HegCO/fyjcx+opdSR6AAgck3xykGeW5f4GvHbq5aVk3GQrqYrKF /iSb6FWjyepXz4GnO649I3cPTfmfTfsOi3hoIWODSj1dxtv5our3zI70ZujK1dDnyE9p Zjei7LsUjFP9096POT3w6EU0pOh+by8vS46JHadGauu4Vxo+tDUap2g3FvfD/ozQtWt/ ww==
Received: from stntexhc10.cis.neustar.com ([156.154.17.216]) by mx0a-0018ba01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 26nxm15fav-1 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 15 Nov 2016 03:05:53 -0500
Received: from STNTEXMB10.cis.neustar.com ([169.254.5.94]) by stntexhc10.cis.neustar.com ([169.254.4.125]) with mapi id 14.03.0279.002; Tue, 15 Nov 2016 03:05:51 -0500
From: "Rosen, Brian" <Brian.Rosen@neustar.biz>
To: Dan Romascanu <dromasca@gmail.com>, Tim Chown <Tim.Chown@jisc.ac.uk>
Thread-Topic: [97attendees] meetecho from remote participant perspective
Thread-Index: AQHSPxIxVBYLcOXdNUqdHF5D3tuTWKDZ+0eAgAAAjgCAAAafAIAAmD4A
Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2016 08:05:51 +0000
Message-ID: <D450F064.FA6F7%brian.rosen@neustar.biz>
References: <CAFgnS4XHZ2cRx1XD41vmnkohx_PjXLVj5RsoZEC=eyAvXV_umw@mail.gmail.com> <037f01d23f12$d0025260$7006f720$@olddog.co.uk> <17633600-6A04-4A2D-8DA8-BAF529A052ED@jisc.ac.uk> <CAFgnS4UN+W4z3_C4OvhJ7k8GJ-ysuEafcdFg0BVOts3hnKSjvw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAFgnS4UN+W4z3_C4OvhJ7k8GJ-ysuEafcdFg0BVOts3hnKSjvw@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.5.8.151023
x-originating-ip: [10.96.8.226]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_D450F064FA6F7brianrosenneustarbiz_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:, , definitions=2016-11-15_03:, , signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Reason: safe
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/97attendees/L1IKxBhQOdG04IpuYPIdsBQ137U>
Cc: "adrian@olddog.co.uk" <adrian@olddog.co.uk>, "97attendees@ietf.org" <97attendees@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [97attendees] meetecho from remote participant perspective
X-BeenThere: 97attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Mailing list of IETF 97 attendees that have opted in on this list." <97attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/97attendees>, <mailto:97attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/97attendees/>
List-Post: <mailto:97attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:97attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/97attendees>, <mailto:97attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2016 08:05:57 -0000

I don’t think that does anything.  Meetecho uses jabber.  It’s connected to our regular jabber server, using our normal rooms.  Using the meetecho jabber client is certainly fine, but using any other jabber client works fine too, from our common server.

Brian

From: 97attendees <97attendees-bounces@ietf.org<mailto:97attendees-bounces@ietf.org>> on behalf of Dan Romascanu <dromasca@gmail.com<mailto:dromasca@gmail.com>>
Date: Tuesday, November 15, 2016 at 3:00 AM
To: Tim Chown <Tim.Chown@jisc.ac.uk<mailto:Tim.Chown@jisc.ac.uk>>
Cc: "adrian@olddog.co.uk<mailto:adrian@olddog.co.uk>" <adrian@olddog.co.uk<mailto:adrian@olddog.co.uk>>, "97attendees@ietf.org<mailto:97attendees@ietf.org>" <97attendees@ietf.org<mailto:97attendees@ietf.org>>
Subject: Re: [97attendees] meetecho from remote participant perspective

Should we consider deprecating jabber? I confess that I did not even bother launching my client, as the meetecho chat works so well.

Regards,

Dan


On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 9:37 AM, Tim Chown <Tim.Chown@jisc.ac.uk<mailto:Tim.Chown@jisc.ac.uk>> wrote:
It’s very good.

I suspect very few people are now using Jabber, with most joining directly to Meetecho. It would be interesting to see stats, if available.

Tim



On 15 Nov 2016, at 07:35, Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk<mailto:adrian@olddog.co.uk>> wrote:

I'd like to echo Dan's thanks.

In the space of just a few meetings MeetEcho has gone from an experimental prototype to a regular and accepted part of the meetings.

The only thing I find missing is that some chairs are unfamiliar with the system. We probably need to arrange a small amount of playing to get them over that hurdle.

Adrian

From: 97attendees [mailto:97attendees-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Dan Romascanu
Sent: 15 November 2016 07:31
To: 97attendees@ietf.org<mailto:97attendees@ietf.org>
Subject: [97attendees] meetecho from remote participant perspective

It's my first time using meetecho as remote participant. My experience is very good so far. I actually find it easier to make comments or ask questions as remote participant than in the room! Thursday I will co-chair a WG meeting remotely, let's see how this will work.

Thanks to the team!
Dan
_______________________________________________
97attendees mailing list
97attendees@ietf.org<mailto:97attendees@ietf.org>
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/97attendees


_______________________________________________
97attendees mailing list
97attendees@ietf.org<mailto:97attendees@ietf.org>
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/97attendees

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email