[97attendees] meetecho from remote participant perspective

Dan Romascanu <dromasca@gmail.com> Tue, 15 November 2016 07:30 UTC

Return-Path: <dromasca@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: 97attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 97attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F8EE12950D for <97attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 14 Nov 2016 23:30:40 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.699
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id AyuW8vRUoghK for <97attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 14 Nov 2016 23:30:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-qt0-x233.google.com (mail-qt0-x233.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c0d::233]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DFCCA1294AD for <97attendees@ietf.org>; Mon, 14 Nov 2016 23:30:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-qt0-x233.google.com with SMTP id c47so62669438qtc.2 for <97attendees@ietf.org>; Mon, 14 Nov 2016 23:30:38 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=hjuvOaOoejTZ+zEsNG0EYn/VwaMds9VeZ2DiL65vvk0=; b=Bf3rOV6N1HpsS7gitT7wIZ9FHsbSNaOHrOXlpQuOF8zKqcuLb8poQcRiays1StUa5g IWI7QZ3zSAt3ucKJyccTNGe7l7s5axpDKS8WYHdqD1PQIcFYJgqeQ2MyhUp4bSZzKIKR DXtOruBhZnkGggnG/P0HNnGxv4ySnRfNomTql60Z/lVDz4vYW3ytKW5qAqYQ4eL/TIWU nQFN5CvL/vdUQik8DSyMu8dD3CtUIJwhHf5udQJqbBbJHdYmLtUtOuZ/ZvG26XMoCNJQ KdYTsUtDQ9otx6n4IQfr9a7W+xH54xUVY5rO5XuSzMlW5e6Ky9Go4HsDz+OgCrp1AJAw /fiw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=hjuvOaOoejTZ+zEsNG0EYn/VwaMds9VeZ2DiL65vvk0=; b=D+6DhJJjkhVO3MWa4s5kCSqfH8cBAO58Q1dZPVbrVJlCnjjP0YzjUI7vD81jRpnxMC o83JTxpTboFEXRaJBT9QIfBi7tq+PBz63VUQP8X2C9Z196mVb/Ev4TEaP/x9MUz2nIEP qrRFIyFOB9kOA9d09caTZod5X8BcSFq25kYB9HQvUs3msKkDL6ZjwN5rL9cz7K+lkYoI XSNLYA7Xl7w5RRs1D698EvXU9lRLiXvtC2l0CuceOsffZMWoC5Oa0ySaFmIEECYhnKd5 widElqjBBjXIK6I/5AFOg8RKwp5SsEVWgH3aZ607DUGXGYuusdVPVL325HXKwVaGN9ZH GyhA==
X-Gm-Message-State: ABUngvc5s1hNjau5zkTN7gZPRE7ylIYzJpbwJocjZGqsQrXuyfncNe/+G8eIi6swYrLLkBwJGQWmKBxBxxh8iw==
X-Received: by 10.200.46.129 with SMTP id h1mr9119417qta.277.1479195037708; Mon, 14 Nov 2016 23:30:37 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.140.21.228 with HTTP; Mon, 14 Nov 2016 23:30:37 -0800 (PST)
From: Dan Romascanu <dromasca@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2016 09:30:37 +0200
Message-ID: <CAFgnS4XHZ2cRx1XD41vmnkohx_PjXLVj5RsoZEC=eyAvXV_umw@mail.gmail.com>
To: 97attendees@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a1135dedec6b751054151eecd
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/97attendees/LcCwrZSGlEZYmEAJPA8unPdMT0w>
Subject: [97attendees] meetecho from remote participant perspective
X-BeenThere: 97attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Mailing list of IETF 97 attendees that have opted in on this list." <97attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/97attendees>, <mailto:97attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/97attendees/>
List-Post: <mailto:97attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:97attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/97attendees>, <mailto:97attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2016 07:30:40 -0000

It's my first time using meetecho as remote participant. My experience is
very good so far. I actually find it easier to make comments or ask
questions as remote participant than in the room! Thursday I will co-chair
a WG meeting remotely, let's see how this will work.

Thanks to the team!

Dan