IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [97attendees] Conrad rooms hot?

"Ben Campbell" <ben@nostrum.com> Sat, 12 November 2016 23:55 UTC

Return-Path: <ben@nostrum.com>
X-Original-To: 97attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 97attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C822412965E for <97attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 12 Nov 2016 15:55:10 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.396
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.396 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DIET_1=0.001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.497] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id D3rnwk48yAHs for <97attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 12 Nov 2016 15:55:09 -0800 (PST)
Received: from nostrum.com (raven-v6.nostrum.com [IPv6:2001:470:d:1130::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 43E8012940C for <97attendees@ietf.org>; Sat, 12 Nov 2016 15:55:09 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [10.10.1.2] ([162.216.46.26]) (authenticated bits=0) by nostrum.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id uACNt4eU067138 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO); Sat, 12 Nov 2016 17:55:07 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from ben@nostrum.com)
X-Authentication-Warning: raven.nostrum.com: Host [162.216.46.26] claimed to be [10.10.1.2]
From: "Ben Campbell" <ben@nostrum.com>
To: "Warren Kumari" <warren@kumari.net>
Date: Sun, 13 Nov 2016 08:55:04 +0900
Message-ID: <63BE99DC-A11C-459B-AEF7-1BDE776F6BEE@nostrum.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAHw9_i+UjXMXGmHjxipFNBLS00kZLJkqH=gyxniz21qFPtokLw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAHw9_i+UjXMXGmHjxipFNBLS00kZLJkqH=gyxniz21qFPtokLw@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed
X-Mailer: MailMate (1.9.5r5263)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/97attendees/NjWm9hkQ4GCuXbJQ_YduOrHq9Kk>
Cc: 97attendees@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [97attendees] Conrad rooms hot?
X-BeenThere: 97attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Mailing list of IETF 97 attendees that have opted in on this list." <97attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/97attendees>, <mailto:97attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/97attendees/>
List-Post: <mailto:97attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:97attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/97attendees>, <mailto:97attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 12 Nov 2016 23:55:11 -0000

Mine was hot on arrival (set to 24), and it did not get better if I 
lowered the set point by a small increment. A larger increment kicked it 
into cool mode, and it has been pleasant 21-21.5 since.

On 13 Nov 2016, at 8:42, Warren Kumari wrote:

> First!
>
> More seriously, has anyone found their hotel guest room too hot? I've
> got the AC bumped all the way to cold (and have tried without it on as
> well), and my room still feels overly warm.
> Perhaps if I lost some weight that would help, but...
>
> W
>
> -- 
> I don't think the execution is relevant when it was obviously a bad
> idea in the first place.
> This is like putting rabid weasels in your pants, and later expressing
> regret at having chosen those particular rabid weasels and that pair
> of pants.
>    ---maf
>
> _______________________________________________
> 97attendees mailing list
> 97attendees@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/97attendees

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email