IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [97attendees] meetecho from remote participant perspective

Tim Chown <Tim.Chown@jisc.ac.uk> Tue, 15 November 2016 08:14 UTC

Return-Path: <tim.chown@jisc.ac.uk>
X-Original-To: 97attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 97attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA71F129A35 for <97attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 15 Nov 2016 00:14:48 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.11
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.11 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_DKIM_INVALID=0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (1024-bit key) reason="fail (body has been altered)" header.d=jisc365.onmicrosoft.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MJbq9OtTO-7K for <97attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 15 Nov 2016 00:14:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: from eu-smtp-delivery-189.mimecast.com (eu-smtp-delivery-189.mimecast.com [207.82.80.189]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 67A0912973E for <97attendees@ietf.org>; Tue, 15 Nov 2016 00:14:45 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=jisc365.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector1-jisc-ac-uk; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version; bh=s9p2g058ruQpzVvG8vVA4kvoiNHVN6HH233VhZDH3hc=; b=HsuuX5xINEHnxXsrM4dnqfyKDX5sd9EdzcZ6RuBzsJl//2gRrwTEd5VSAQ9LSfxeT1Vy59J7wTfVUyiVZvfDU+PXkAz7BQUOwuhqwXKNIYs/FK3f5shekZgCaEqTtT34Kgvy+EV3DAYBkzvlM0aJ+T8hnZs6ewrDHBNZp9VSsi0=
Received: from EUR01-HE1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-he1eur01lp0207.outbound.protection.outlook.com [213.199.154.207]) (Using TLS) by eu-smtp-1.mimecast.com with ESMTP id uk-mta-50-m5N9GEB1PNCu8VVgS5ZXaA-1; Tue, 15 Nov 2016 08:14:40 +0000
Received: from VI1PR07MB1151.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com (10.163.168.148) by VI1PR07MB1149.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com (10.163.168.146) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA384_P384) id 15.1.707.1; Tue, 15 Nov 2016 08:14:36 +0000
Received: from VI1PR07MB1151.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com ([10.163.168.148]) by VI1PR07MB1151.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com ([10.163.168.148]) with mapi id 15.01.0721.015; Tue, 15 Nov 2016 08:14:36 +0000
From: Tim Chown <Tim.Chown@jisc.ac.uk>
To: "Rosen, Brian" <Brian.Rosen@neustar.biz>
Thread-Topic: [97attendees] meetecho from remote participant perspective
Thread-Index: AQHSPxIzbjzqFh1c8Uud4fjg4oe12qDZp3WAgAAAjACAAAahAIAAAWKAgAACawA=
Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2016 08:14:36 +0000
Message-ID: <5CD4825B-7B42-41C9-8640-5A95A3D4582A@jisc.ac.uk>
References: <CAFgnS4XHZ2cRx1XD41vmnkohx_PjXLVj5RsoZEC=eyAvXV_umw@mail.gmail.com> <037f01d23f12$d0025260$7006f720$@olddog.co.uk> <17633600-6A04-4A2D-8DA8-BAF529A052ED@jisc.ac.uk> <CAFgnS4UN+W4z3_C4OvhJ7k8GJ-ysuEafcdFg0BVOts3hnKSjvw@mail.gmail.com> <D450F064.FA6F7%brian.rosen@neustar.biz>
In-Reply-To: <D450F064.FA6F7%brian.rosen@neustar.biz>
Accept-Language: en-GB, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-mailer: Apple Mail (2.3251)
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-originating-ip: [2001:67c:370:128:747f:4775:e228:c3cc]
x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1; VI1PR07MB1149; 7:CPLb3leWZ3mMq3rypMed8bqlz3MrOZuXDUvnkVqxoHXm/eP42hoAscVLCXSHo3z0d8W/NnzjyAKhIl+2FheBGFl3ipGRI8rTBLasydSGJgtEuc7BOTSCzpDuHxlrJSPfGZVYIKlMZfbcVjrGPTvVZL9WPNcwcKNQAbZCgN5jTShTePoQamSbKUGDM/SJvs2X1jbelIyzPj1NlMSrS1t27vcODMfXPjLoAVbn8O3ItYMZGCCELoUcK99tW1AMtf4rDrxtAssmr4HZBBjLpvG1FhTAUB/CmSHuuHh171kCn7Z/iWbQPk6m7LjuKDgHprSaz2f33hqo6Sta1wHBpBLoo5JB1Q36emGItBTyGmm5/pA=; 20:1roXmpJoa45VWFrJiewsnSGCGnhRgj0IggOtemveX9rUCKTsVzdc4YifgdandOkCpNV0TC0QA7nuC+yzz5BZUu3ur1pX1k6+BOe5B3VCpBTwrePId28b9TzlhZYQ1elf4mw2N1L/iiBwOW1gzNVDlHQDtzoV6tcNnas+ZhvI6eg=
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: d790ecbb-8df7-40fe-a756-08d40d2f7079
x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:;BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:(22001);SRVR:VI1PR07MB1149;
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <VI1PR07MB114982354CA7DF9CB0027EF9D6BF0@VI1PR07MB1149.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
x-exchange-antispam-report-test: UriScan:(274715658323672)(158342451672863);
x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(6060326)(601004)(2401047)(5005006)(8121501046)(3002001)(10201501046)(6061324); SRVR:VI1PR07MB1149; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:; SRVR:VI1PR07MB1149;
x-forefront-prvs: 012792EC17
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10009020)(7916002)(377454003)(24454002)(199003)(189002)(81166006)(3280700002)(101416001)(82746002)(8676002)(76176999)(5660300001)(86362001)(83716003)(6116002)(189998001)(102836003)(3660700001)(74482002)(106356001)(92566002)(110136003)(2950100002)(6916009)(77096005)(97736004)(42882006)(50986999)(36756003)(33656002)(81156014)(93886004)(4326007)(106116001)(2900100001)(122556002)(2906002)(68736007)(105586002)(57306001)(7846002)(87936001)(7906003)(8936002)(50226002)(7736002)(229853002)(104396002); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101; SCL:1; SRVR:VI1PR07MB1149; H:VI1PR07MB1151.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; PTR:InfoNoRecords; A:1; MX:1; LANG:en;
spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:99
spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: jisc.ac.uk
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 15 Nov 2016 08:14:36.6696 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 48f9394d-8a14-4d27-82a6-f35f12361205
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: VI1PR07MB1149
X-MC-Unique: m5N9GEB1PNCu8VVgS5ZXaA-1
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_5CD4825B7B4241C986405A95A3D4582Ajiscacuk_"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/97attendees/dFXUlsbKFzLCHkrsQ2WsmyCDv4I>
Cc: "97attendees@ietf.org" <97attendees@ietf.org>, "adrian@olddog.co.uk" <adrian@olddog.co.uk>, Dan Romascanu <dromasca@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [97attendees] meetecho from remote participant perspective
X-BeenThere: 97attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Mailing list of IETF 97 attendees that have opted in on this list." <97attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/97attendees>, <mailto:97attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/97attendees/>
List-Post: <mailto:97attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:97attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/97attendees>, <mailto:97attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2016 08:14:49 -0000

My Jabber client has had significant problems connecting today.  It was OK yesterday.

I’ve not reported it though as Meetecho does everything in one view (chat, slides and video).

Not sure about deprecating it, as Jabber + audio is a more lightweight way to participate remotely. Would be interesting to see the stats though.

Tim

On 15 Nov 2016, at 08:05, Rosen, Brian <Brian.Rosen@neustar.biz<mailto:Brian.Rosen@neustar.biz>> wrote:

I don’t think that does anything.  Meetecho uses jabber.  It’s connected to our regular jabber server, using our normal rooms.  Using the meetecho jabber client is certainly fine, but using any other jabber client works fine too, from our common server.

Brian

From: 97attendees <97attendees-bounces@ietf.org<mailto:97attendees-bounces@ietf.org>> on behalf of Dan Romascanu <dromasca@gmail.com<mailto:dromasca@gmail.com>>
Date: Tuesday, November 15, 2016 at 3:00 AM
To: Tim Chown <Tim.Chown@jisc.ac.uk<mailto:Tim.Chown@jisc.ac.uk>>
Cc: "adrian@olddog.co.uk<mailto:adrian@olddog.co.uk>" <adrian@olddog.co.uk<mailto:adrian@olddog.co.uk>>, "97attendees@ietf.org<mailto:97attendees@ietf.org>" <97attendees@ietf.org<mailto:97attendees@ietf.org>>
Subject: Re: [97attendees] meetecho from remote participant perspective

Should we consider deprecating jabber? I confess that I did not even bother launching my client, as the meetecho chat works so well.

Regards,

Dan


On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 9:37 AM, Tim Chown <Tim.Chown@jisc.ac.uk<mailto:Tim.Chown@jisc.ac.uk>> wrote:
It’s very good.

I suspect very few people are now using Jabber, with most joining directly to Meetecho. It would be interesting to see stats, if available.

Tim



On 15 Nov 2016, at 07:35, Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk<mailto:adrian@olddog.co.uk>> wrote:

I'd like to echo Dan's thanks.

In the space of just a few meetings MeetEcho has gone from an experimental prototype to a regular and accepted part of the meetings.

The only thing I find missing is that some chairs are unfamiliar with the system. We probably need to arrange a small amount of playing to get them over that hurdle.

Adrian

From: 97attendees [mailto:97attendees-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Dan Romascanu
Sent: 15 November 2016 07:31
To: 97attendees@ietf.org<mailto:97attendees@ietf.org>
Subject: [97attendees] meetecho from remote participant perspective

It's my first time using meetecho as remote participant. My experience is very good so far. I actually find it easier to make comments or ask questions as remote participant than in the room! Thursday I will co-chair a WG meeting remotely, let's see how this will work.

Thanks to the team!
Dan
_______________________________________________
97attendees mailing list
97attendees@ietf.org<mailto:97attendees@ietf.org>
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/97attendees


_______________________________________________
97attendees mailing list
97attendees@ietf.org<mailto:97attendees@ietf.org>
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/97attendees


_______________________________________________
97attendees mailing list
97attendees@ietf.org<mailto:97attendees@ietf.org>
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/97attendees

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email