Re: [97attendees] Elevator weight limits?
"Carlos M. Martinez" <carlosm3011@gmail.com> Tue, 15 November 2016 00:49 UTC
Return-Path: <carlosm3011@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: 97attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 97attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 143E0129452
for <97attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 14 Nov 2016 16:49:06 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.75
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.75 tagged_above=-999 required=5
tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1,
DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25,
FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key)
header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44])
by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id jdPb2w5zSiKq for <97attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>;
Mon, 14 Nov 2016 16:49:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pg0-x230.google.com (mail-pg0-x230.google.com
[IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c05::230])
(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 73DCD1295B8
for <97attendees@ietf.org>; Mon, 14 Nov 2016 16:49:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-pg0-x230.google.com with SMTP id p66so59841365pga.2
for <97attendees@ietf.org>; Mon, 14 Nov 2016 16:49:02 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references
:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding;
bh=BJuele2YYJlkWEEMMjaUyQhTJDdi3pwEWAMReiMvEBQ=;
b=tqxqhNiMA7xY592uvU5wnK5JlIf1mLqa49E4/7IYUUWx8nrJTjPB2F3OG8UtL1M03U
vuSR3Ulzh50Rvyxgb58WtZja5rLpX1WOCcPUj+VOLlQO9mnHBvgFG1ytRFj8+KDpNQNT
5QD83O8aD8b4/kiUeF6peC9PSavNvo8U1ZxBirZQ0TJ3BT+wNvEYM1CnJqoJtECHjISe
CX+0HuY56sZmmKA+tHfJzREEZgc01OMirw3W3oz8fnGK90bNUH3UbbJXWPPCSWr/nqjU
8l5O+jjS9Z/j8A+K7CwRFMPqL8mRmWHySEDdOF6qXJAiLf0R8phYZwahARimzZ52phyq
E8Pg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to
:references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding;
bh=BJuele2YYJlkWEEMMjaUyQhTJDdi3pwEWAMReiMvEBQ=;
b=dJDhTeE0JBq6O9lKc5VO2w/FnPaWfwzFyYr+gXKzJ/0HUkj8dNCQ86zZj3MC89ecNz
89wegsFShwMbDyJi1FGGlBLVUL5heNIp8No2sPDbKpmhTMn36sgERH0oSIqls5EpdNVC
veYyM8dmmwk4MxPzrEntQka8ZUAVlE4LrLcI8CPAq/isWYG9bYi6N5RxEoqMvG0BD5yM
ysk9SRWWajarTyWgHI5SSUdGADwUkp5A4MlK4T5LLMuZaC3EbuBQOk/X0Ran3fCuc0OA
zrAiwaSyTZwjqxk/+F5quqTAlIZj4jbS2sf6eajhGWXl9rkGjUQys0qfcu+dIsci11r7
f3aQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: ABUngvdhE+7xT31Rz3euZOW9VPckKQpamRAi9SF3fKjIDFM6Uc3KVhgN3uMlkk0aDwSqLw==
X-Received: by 10.99.244.17 with SMTP id g17mr33507908pgi.80.1479170941880;
Mon, 14 Nov 2016 16:49:01 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [31.133.136.180] ([2001:67c:370:128:98e0:f513:f946:9583])
by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id u23sm37786383pfg.86.2016.11.14.16.49.00
(version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128);
Mon, 14 Nov 2016 16:49:01 -0800 (PST)
From: "Carlos M. Martinez" <carlosm3011@gmail.com>
To: "Jeff Haas" <jhaas@juniper.net>
Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2016 09:48:55 +0900
Message-ID: <4C95A7A5-CF7E-48F5-9EAD-3F32C50953A9@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <E0C1B15A-7976-4AF6-8F3A-3304A7CCCDFA@juniper.net>
References: <677418F6-35EF-4A33-8C2A-1C3CA709D98B@sunet.se>
<E0C1B15A-7976-4AF6-8F3A-3304A7CCCDFA@juniper.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Mailer: MailMate (1.9.5r5263)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/97attendees/dopatdD5-82fli5xt1Ln30YjRD0>
Cc: "97attendees@ietf.org" <97attendees@ietf.org>,
Leif Johansson <leifj@sunet.se>
Subject: Re: [97attendees] Elevator weight limits?
X-BeenThere: 97attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Mailing list of IETF 97 attendees that have opted in on this list."
<97attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/97attendees>,
<mailto:97attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/97attendees/>
List-Post: <mailto:97attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:97attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/97attendees>,
<mailto:97attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2016 00:49:06 -0000
I don’t think I’ve ever been in a place where the ratio Y/X makes any kind of sense. In fact, I used to work in a building where, if you where to believe the signs on the elevators, the average weight of any person was ~40kg. On 15 Nov 2016, at 8:59, Jeff Haas wrote: > The format is usually "X <unit of weight>, Y <number of people>". > > I leave the jokes about Y/X not being representative of the average > weight of a given person from a given part of the planet to you.
- [97attendees] Elevator weight limits? Leif Johansson
- Re: [97attendees] Elevator weight limits? Jeff Haas
- Re: [97attendees] Elevator weight limits? Dennis Kort
- Re: [97attendees] Elevator weight limits? Carlos M. Martinez