Re: [97attendees] Elevator Operation tips

Bill Fenner <fenner@fenron.com> Mon, 14 November 2016 22:59 UTC

Return-Path: <fenner@fenron.com>
X-Original-To: 97attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 97attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D5F91294A7 for <97attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 14 Nov 2016 14:59:14 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=fenron.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id e0sxZaE3xpVA for <97attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 14 Nov 2016 14:59:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-vk0-x231.google.com (mail-vk0-x231.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c05::231]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C50271293E9 for <97attendees@ietf.org>; Mon, 14 Nov 2016 14:59:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-vk0-x231.google.com with SMTP id 137so75973055vkl.0 for <97attendees@ietf.org>; Mon, 14 Nov 2016 14:59:12 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fenron.com; s=google; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=ySk9Up84cCh9GZLEn4d+Tfg47AfgAmb4OqV/33EZUEs=; b=NPTztJIQV1/roHBTlilDaLgwBBhl4Bir446mTdEWNar/6eaHM2zofLBghL4+qH5FZ6 iKL5orP/9wIIFA7MzaEOqNxIEr78BmiZUiIZ88+jir0TKx3Nh2TfRI8mNlY7dBPrI/5L 49Zt8W8wd++9mN2CluxGWp2UlF+l8xeMJdBR4=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=ySk9Up84cCh9GZLEn4d+Tfg47AfgAmb4OqV/33EZUEs=; b=dPE2H8DfkAL47l40xnzZir3khd7wSIIBx7hFB1h2xhQjAQghPTxa/9rhJsn4MK9Qp5 bom08cFtw3oMWhX9uhY9DtnfYDH7dJ7eJtw8OYnJBQhQTwpCCBjiXCPnA0xUxHYtlK05 bBfXXrJ+JlOVO6casO1G2FWU7ogX58jxp3PxY4CuGEPTxJBxdrJtrCWkTclfpCClSh3d fx05TkjAN1aV6LFjYk5FrwlWtm86dQx9xFK1nMgzXp0hQJs4JLMVmFEp8W+S6Wsaj0iW P9EOb4Fy6sNZBZfe27zoAPBAxe12NBI4FNeJ+o6pgTBgOwfRG3mU+rSiwMoQ7yFtJwj6 Ct+Q==
X-Gm-Message-State: ABUngve0IbSd4jBSptnNJLPuzGmgn92AZ2zGYV3rM4csBjWFbSmDZqmf0udLSKXr00DBB7WoN4BQCQ7gID65Hw==
X-Received: by 10.31.231.194 with SMTP id e185mr9711391vkh.145.1479164351929; Mon, 14 Nov 2016 14:59:11 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.176.80.225 with HTTP; Mon, 14 Nov 2016 14:59:11 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <FA1BA401-E96B-48D7-83CF-34424470E117@puck.nether.net>
References: <a29dc956-ccb6-c493-7323-6bc46ca09d47@nostrum.com> <26345.1479134011@dooku.sandelman.ca> <20161114221722.GB16512@laperouse.bortzmeyer.org> <FA1BA401-E96B-48D7-83CF-34424470E117@puck.nether.net>
From: Bill Fenner <fenner@fenron.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2016 17:59:11 -0500
Message-ID: <CAATsVbZRORikdK=_uNNHFnBp-DX7Jgagwm9bjJ0KmsQAWdENDg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Jared Mauch <jared@puck.nether.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=94eb2c0913a8c3126505414ac99f
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/97attendees/mX8r2vRHGzYR5W18vXFY-p4wSpg>
Cc: Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer+ietf@nic.fr>, Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>, 97attendees@ietf.org, Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com>
Subject: Re: [97attendees] Elevator Operation tips
X-BeenThere: 97attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Mailing list of IETF 97 attendees that have opted in on this list." <97attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/97attendees>, <mailto:97attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/97attendees/>
List-Post: <mailto:97attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:97attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/97attendees>, <mailto:97attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2016 22:59:14 -0000

On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 5:28 PM, Jared Mauch <jared@puck.nether.net> wrote:

>
> > On Nov 14, 2016, at 5:17 PM, Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer+ietf@nic.fr>
> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 11:33:31PM +0900,
> > Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> wrote
> > a message of 63 lines which said:
> >
> >> They aren't largely unused: they seem mostly congested, and there is
> >> some difficulty figuring out which elevator is coming, because the
> >> "ding" light often changes from while one is waiting.  People wait a
> >> long time for one,
> >
> > Fully agree. The advice in the subject was quite misleading.
>
> I’ve noticed the light comes on, but it’s not fixed until it’s flashing.
> Some
> floors the ding is not audible (e.g.: Lobby, 37) so one must be actively
> polling your inputs vs waiting for interrupt to trigger event.
>

When I was trying to get to the 1:30 session from 6, both sets of elevators
were called and I stood at a place where I could watch both sets of lights;
it took about 5 minutes before the guestroom elevator arrived (started
blinking), so I abandoned the glass elevator bank.  I've taken the glass
elevators many times, but only successfully during non-congested times.

  Bill