IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [97attendees] meetecho from remote participant perspective

Dan Romascanu <dromasca@gmail.com> Tue, 15 November 2016 08:20 UTC

Return-Path: <dromasca@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: 97attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 97attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 604EC1294E3 for <97attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 15 Nov 2016 00:20:35 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.699
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id irfZFF94s7xH for <97attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 15 Nov 2016 00:20:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-qt0-x22f.google.com (mail-qt0-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c0d::22f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E0344129A4D for <97attendees@ietf.org>; Tue, 15 Nov 2016 00:20:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-qt0-x22f.google.com with SMTP id p16so63276650qta.0 for <97attendees@ietf.org>; Tue, 15 Nov 2016 00:20:26 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=MPmaBhaKsh88maf4vZio8TkjbYUXQ70tMLbkuPGtydw=; b=jikQvQ+Vo9+b66z5rHMcFtFFKfMw3o6jPobP3pCmx4UG7F/yuNJDLrLFzzXwOu/oPr QSeOR/b4bqWLNjGadT+zXxEYfpMGfz0PjEQDlc14/01sA6dWH8dPX4UnVmEj462hCqQb PVh6hKFjSevH+U53nXKNPi69q09+tXcOxl6Sx2PrkE/Z4J92Z1OFijOMpgGeDB9Dw92V YhugZu2a3RefhMuuI01YaDjdAuSe/gnA0xbLN8gL+LJhYATJu2bfI1KNQATIk7tGLT0U X4bPkWYXOJeVsVdxgF3pszkbBUNeI8r4LU+fgWDyc0rLzSskKASMes7OPgbgg2H3hIu4 RvBg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=MPmaBhaKsh88maf4vZio8TkjbYUXQ70tMLbkuPGtydw=; b=K4xxpSFEgRLCd9+5u8vUiP/swIwiwhYoaVpUTV2pflyUu0zoU4D1h/wUyvUdDtpL13 pSh7h7jrYfDgyfnHZFck5rHsuaAB46Z2S/XGs77ONxHdwOHUve62K+1CMnu6qsklDMaX 39W3Fkf9qhhE+S/IzHtth0uNXJlu2PSTb0s2c3Fpsf63xF1nZVVjgjexV3hzTuQQEwJr dBwJBIVskI6iiWNnlmBKsS5JQIZp00ixAaZCcC2TCQXtqYVvF3inPXcpxGvpGY+1+4hC 7cXtQLIjq95DEJuSksM+EwsnepTOQhIeCIInsYWU0knk84NJERDwW01cADv/r0e4FUhl nq5A==
X-Gm-Message-State: ABUngvdV+zwmhK0z1ei2Cr6M6BR4gTzAxKJ/aJMdfUDYWQF9rjw0thi5WWP8JCkcy+4zpRqq/ROgELkT7xlnSw==
X-Received: by 10.200.56.20 with SMTP id q20mr9144322qtb.178.1479198025899; Tue, 15 Nov 2016 00:20:25 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.140.21.228 with HTTP; Tue, 15 Nov 2016 00:20:25 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <D450F064.FA6F7%brian.rosen@neustar.biz>
References: <CAFgnS4XHZ2cRx1XD41vmnkohx_PjXLVj5RsoZEC=eyAvXV_umw@mail.gmail.com> <037f01d23f12$d0025260$7006f720$@olddog.co.uk> <17633600-6A04-4A2D-8DA8-BAF529A052ED@jisc.ac.uk> <CAFgnS4UN+W4z3_C4OvhJ7k8GJ-ysuEafcdFg0BVOts3hnKSjvw@mail.gmail.com> <D450F064.FA6F7%brian.rosen@neustar.biz>
From: Dan Romascanu <dromasca@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2016 10:20:25 +0200
Message-ID: <CAFgnS4VD7Zh_p5upk3NDA=q40=efGtoW8sFFYkA2vhKeEXoiNA@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Rosen, Brian" <Brian.Rosen@neustar.biz>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a1137b106e2e256054152a010
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/97attendees/xW52IlEkEnu55f2n-q84muH03kQ>
Cc: Tim Chown <Tim.Chown@jisc.ac.uk>, "adrian@olddog.co.uk" <adrian@olddog.co.uk>, "97attendees@ietf.org" <97attendees@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [97attendees] meetecho from remote participant perspective
X-BeenThere: 97attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Mailing list of IETF 97 attendees that have opted in on this list." <97attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/97attendees>, <mailto:97attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/97attendees/>
List-Post: <mailto:97attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:97attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/97attendees>, <mailto:97attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2016 08:20:35 -0000

cool - thanks for the clrification!

Regards,

Dan


On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 10:05 AM, Rosen, Brian <Brian.Rosen@neustar.biz>
wrote:

> I don’t think that does anything.  Meetecho uses jabber.  It’s connected
> to our regular jabber server, using our normal rooms.  Using the meetecho
> jabber client is certainly fine, but using any other jabber client works
> fine too, from our common server.
>
> Brian
>
> From: 97attendees <97attendees-bounces@ietf.org> on behalf of Dan
> Romascanu <dromasca@gmail.com>
> Date: Tuesday, November 15, 2016 at 3:00 AM
> To: Tim Chown <Tim.Chown@jisc.ac.uk>
> Cc: "adrian@olddog.co.uk" <adrian@olddog.co.uk>uk>, "97attendees@ietf.org" <
> 97attendees@ietf.org>
> Subject: Re: [97attendees] meetecho from remote participant perspective
>
> Should we consider deprecating jabber? I confess that I did not even
> bother launching my client, as the meetecho chat works so well.
>
> Regards,
>
> Dan
>
>
> On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 9:37 AM, Tim Chown <Tim.Chown@jisc.ac.uk> wrote:
>
>> It’s very good.
>>
>> I suspect very few people are now using Jabber, with most joining
>> directly to Meetecho. It would be interesting to see stats, if available.
>>
>> Tim
>>
>>
>>
>> On 15 Nov 2016, at 07:35, Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk> wrote:
>>
>> I'd like to echo Dan's thanks.
>>
>> In the space of just a few meetings MeetEcho has gone from an
>> experimental prototype to a regular and accepted part of the meetings.
>>
>> The only thing I find missing is that some chairs are unfamiliar with the
>> system. We probably need to arrange a small amount of playing to get them
>> over that hurdle.
>>
>> Adrian
>>
>> *From:* 97attendees [mailto:97attendees-bounces@ietf.org
>> <97attendees-bounces@ietf.org>] *On Behalf Of *Dan Romascanu
>> *Sent:* 15 November 2016 07:31
>> *To:* 97attendees@ietf.org
>> *Subject:* [97attendees] meetecho from remote participant perspective
>>
>>
>> It's my first time using meetecho as remote participant. My experience is
>> very good so far. I actually find it easier to make comments or ask
>> questions as remote participant than in the room! Thursday I will co-chair
>> a WG meeting remotely, let's see how this will work.
>>
>> Thanks to the team!
>>
>> Dan
>> _______________________________________________
>> 97attendees mailing list
>> 97attendees@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/97attendees
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> 97attendees mailing list
>> 97attendees@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/97attendees
>>
>>
>

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email