IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [97attendees] Room DNS not of high fidelity

joel jaeggli <joelja@gmail.com> Sat, 12 November 2016 04:16 UTC

Return-Path: <joelja@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: 97attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 97attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2A9E12968A for <97attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 11 Nov 2016 20:16:47 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Q-ncS2rJDDhe for <97attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 11 Nov 2016 20:16:46 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pg0-x22b.google.com (mail-pg0-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c05::22b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 090881293EE for <97attendees@ietf.org>; Fri, 11 Nov 2016 20:16:46 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-pg0-x22b.google.com with SMTP id 3so21248006pgd.0 for <97attendees@ietf.org>; Fri, 11 Nov 2016 20:16:46 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :in-reply-to; bh=eMHpPGysEi201f5E9dwOlQjSQ6wSvgQT2EdqSpE3sHU=; b=jV2rBG+UNOBfRM8GFwPobOwsXw0EuoL4GOFyoI1Q4Gs0cISlm9om4zCzqX+zgdss3p 0bEaCjyss46ypihPu6M11uZ/zMaNlB3jNMAXH3+ywa4ZzUfPaQek5Cn43cuHYC4MUod/ kh1b28HnHwvvQ6CTV2ke/+ViXU9ahMcjPTBpn4L0aAA1xgXcnqDegfPm/7s+tL0NiS7g oywVYEcgTP4xPCYZnZJVfOz1RpcN+Mqx+NREoRFXILfdmWIZxY3DRt5yT8UP4tCp3hij slHLLHJNTyRg5qR4U55t1X83d81G4KFgSbYgDDfTXF8MNmtS5JFlKKNYjx3epEp3houE ASDQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=eMHpPGysEi201f5E9dwOlQjSQ6wSvgQT2EdqSpE3sHU=; b=K942nR2BTU/flB9gFDA8HIl8CgTeQXf9zruWSSt7XjoUl9DlT/yYljVp/UsOc6lsCW 3obx39Ra+/Dpff3N0hQrMt+3KRZhZPTwfPAwFyBvqYYXUSDNwfYjYNzJvo9WsOXtQmU9 A+o50GqPFmdO5DUDbs+Ha2FOenT6MzrRvtP+2jQNAiZDMf+8M1FitKW0ghOgvrIaUNk1 tAEy/kNNCs9q8NBR94JNJ7ZJxXMtIjTPyo9AKZQwR8Z2SuIo8AOroyVRBV9UrqR6Xn/6 jF1O28/TwEbIM6QmSHyCGt4snerPVsFOxm4SGt7vqsDBjh8ahPasK45ioLkXgRA5uKhG K7rA==
X-Gm-Message-State: ABUngvfZB6hlyAR7f3fA84fF2cYyZIpNulA9Cu3hYtU3zMqDDBXpMkhfH7EZ0qZcgLix7Q==
X-Received: by 10.98.27.132 with SMTP id b126mr13449927pfb.171.1478924205210; Fri, 11 Nov 2016 20:16:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: from dhcp-8969.meeting.ietf.org ([2001:67c:370:128:2478:6cef:49f8:40e]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id p25sm18467932pfk.20.2016.11.11.20.16.42 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 11 Nov 2016 20:16:43 -0800 (PST)
To: Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com>, 97attendees@ietf.org
References: <b6b858e8-b89e-cd3e-8925-65a73c1616ff@nostrum.com>
From: joel jaeggli <joelja@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <0dfb274e-31c9-c88c-d3d3-12bd14ca94cf@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 12 Nov 2016 13:16:36 +0900
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.12; rv:50.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/50.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <b6b858e8-b89e-cd3e-8925-65a73c1616ff@nostrum.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="5wPEu2cdAfd6OBbgwjUbwmo1R3QMV53R3"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/97attendees/ynjE1nu-_UQFpNTJvZdxS8zGxm0>
Subject: Re: [97attendees] Room DNS not of high fidelity
X-BeenThere: 97attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Mailing list of IETF 97 attendees that have opted in on this list." <97attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/97attendees>, <mailto:97attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/97attendees/>
List-Post: <mailto:97attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:97attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/97attendees>, <mailto:97attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 12 Nov 2016 04:16:47 -0000

can replicate.

The dns resolves to an akamai edge node in  locally in sk broadband's
netowork...

does not not appear that the dns is either incorrect or being manipulated.

On 11/12/16 10:01 AM, Adam Roach wrote:
> Just as a warning --
> 
> The circuits in the hotel rooms (at least, as of Saturday morning)
> appear to be local circuits rather than the normal IETF infrastructure.
> Normally, this wouldn't be notable, but the DNS servers don't appear to
> necessarily be doing things correctly. I noticed this when I tried to go
> to http://www.homedepot.com this morning, and was greeted with an error
> message.
> 
> What's really odd is that the name "www.homedepot.com" was resolving to
> a Korean IP address (123.215.198.10). After bringing up my VPN, i was
> able to get to the correct web site just fine.
> 
> So if you're seeing strange behavior in the rooms, you probably want to
> either use a VPN or manually configure your DNS to use a known-good server.
> 
> /a
> 
> 
> P.S. I suspect there's an object lesson in here about DNSSEC, but I'm
> not entirely sure what it is.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> 97attendees mailing list
> 97attendees@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/97attendees

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email