Re: [98attendees] Tussle issue in plenary
Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie> Fri, 31 March 2017 14:39 UTC
Return-Path: <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
X-Original-To: 98attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 98attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 306421298D2 for <98attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 31 Mar 2017 07:39:51 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.302
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.302 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cs.tcd.ie
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id WwOiWHiRioKa for <98attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 31 Mar 2017 07:39:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mercury.scss.tcd.ie (mercury.scss.tcd.ie [134.226.56.6]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C435E129508 for <98attendees@ietf.org>; Fri, 31 Mar 2017 07:39:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mercury.scss.tcd.ie (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66BF4BE3E; Fri, 31 Mar 2017 15:39:35 +0100 (IST)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at scss.tcd.ie
Received: from mercury.scss.tcd.ie ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mercury.scss.tcd.ie [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OuqEPLQnSvTs; Fri, 31 Mar 2017 15:39:34 +0100 (IST)
Received: from [31.133.141.180] (dhcp-8db4.meeting.ietf.org [31.133.141.180]) by mercury.scss.tcd.ie (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 15F88BE51; Fri, 31 Mar 2017 15:39:32 +0100 (IST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cs.tcd.ie; s=mail; t=1490971174; bh=MgLEUXQEq6h+5DgihVTXPDXGTniiw/6gag+PJgzc5EY=; h=Subject:To:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=sqrLiLmHDhL923s7ZZkQ3OZXYq17B+cFqEeo6tKPFOzLv9Aimd38xfyC3uRH9aXs4 y8QzAplv8RZwVpZEAB6wrFjqdVXUe+dFOBeukmHqZGYOGp8KV6cdf7jZb9AIK1wJNE X1fq3F8Pzv8WdjkHBko3Zr3zx6BKSn9tKKFHLMIQ=
To: Bron Gondwana <brong@fastmail.fm>, 98attendees@ietf.org
References: <tencent_4BA31A857FEA40E27003B548@qq.com> <1490942587.113767.929512208.3648B1DF@webmail.messagingengine.com>
From: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
Openpgp: id=D66EA7906F0B897FB2E97D582F3C8736805F8DA2; url=
Message-ID: <2440f643-2a9a-f205-37be-398aa650eb58@cs.tcd.ie>
Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2017 15:39:30 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.8.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <1490942587.113767.929512208.3648B1DF@webmail.messagingengine.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha256"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="IeQKus2TgFGebpEUxI5drjF6a1oA870b9"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/98attendees/WJtwxRasa5wS9HeKnMVw8LBCROQ>
Subject: Re: [98attendees] Tussle issue in plenary
X-BeenThere: 98attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Mailing list of IETF 98 attendees that have opted in on this list." <98attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/98attendees>, <mailto:98attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/98attendees/>
List-Post: <mailto:98attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:98attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/98attendees>, <mailto:98attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2017 14:39:51 -0000
On 31/03/17 07:43, Bron Gondwana wrote: > And the idea of a TLS connection that negotiates in a third party with > rights to watch or even alter traffic in a standard way sounds better to > me than an interception box that terminates your connection with their > own cert that you are required to add to your browser, and then makes an > additional connection onwards: Yuk. Been debated and failed. Proposals were made and turned out crap. We shouldn't go there. Please check the archives of httpbis, tls and saag for those recurring discussions before proposing something. S.
- [98attendees] Tussle issue in plenary Davey
- [98attendees] Ethics and compassion//Re: Tussle i… Xiaohong Deng
- [98attendees] Lost: Men's Ring and Bison; Found: … David C Lawrence
- Re: [98attendees] Tussle issue in plenary Bron Gondwana
- Re: [98attendees] Tussle issue in plenary Michael Richardson
- Re: [98attendees] Tussle issue in plenary Stephen Farrell
- Re: [98attendees] Tussle issue in plenary Vinicius Fortuna [vee-NEE-see.oos]
- Re: [98attendees] Tussle issue in plenary Stephane Bortzmeyer