IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [99attendees] [99all] IETF 99 Meeting Survey

william manning <chinese.apricot@gmail.com> Mon, 31 July 2017 21:10 UTC

Return-Path: <chinese.apricot@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: 99attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 99attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F3D3131CE1; Mon, 31 Jul 2017 14:10:23 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.998
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.998 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VgcpUnQzAZQb; Mon, 31 Jul 2017 14:10:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-it0-x243.google.com (mail-it0-x243.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c0b::243]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5464A131CDC; Mon, 31 Jul 2017 14:10:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-it0-x243.google.com with SMTP id m34so181283iti.0; Mon, 31 Jul 2017 14:10:21 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=YvzhpNrhP93ERB0fEIyHcYFHGlYK9GElyJoBAIOQySw=; b=tPQQK3o3M7LDcmIFs3VHBy6sbzFby8lcxk2BkrKzfSX/f/Sj0HHjq1OsT/SEhHBDDj pL7efBurnJaYO4BvhXAX+xZBeSWA5vbNPilVHIZ1MXMSZ6LboLwcdnHZM+wx/cnOLbfw BtLNJD6q6bEK8MKdzCK5o0l3o29wgxkTMu1UxTPQQ0Xm+f/nwy+0eZXiEMGB35XszpDr w1m7DguZrApU/Mc+IDdlpga/wFnMpo0be+SY3vMCNK0E9ZTzBt/wlx7CBMmusmV8Uf9l 89wLHe5SUSE+HPHe2y+oXatBY7IEBJ28OUFQsWcpYkpglv57iaejQsC3pp30YPHqkxQv f/lQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=YvzhpNrhP93ERB0fEIyHcYFHGlYK9GElyJoBAIOQySw=; b=Eo9bmsSQiwXbGYQj1sg9rQYP/yehmDX51w6C/J2azIjsA0VY2i2SVCuPTBkXaCM2Lc 2e4nDQx9eObLcPgdRz9gJaZK8kMcVXaJK0nl4sIcRz7e1gYk0xWg0M3OA+sD6bO2sEp+ r6w/Q5+T4SFmLegsx/SqziuIOZFEscjGfnob8AAHdT7pVLbj63GWNsXaUyTV9C9yzW28 w6d9CTqpg+ympDNEiF/RmfcV/QpTCFWLBrQ3Fd9C11INpIzVLifkMQSfMLcYmuthoHvk ypMhPra+GBtvk2L5oc9+0gONj3pluf1JVCqBox3sjAIWqsiyhf4BKCBeT9zVItF5toLn i6NQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AIVw111j/H1XtwZEDhhooEEEl5LoqZwPq+ufW6N4XAxFrppRCaRg47lN L9gtPEtdpWn84OkVSFI73dTiBA7kaA==
X-Received: by 10.36.17.69 with SMTP id 66mr19677239itf.9.1501535420517; Mon, 31 Jul 2017 14:10:20 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.107.59.9 with HTTP; Mon, 31 Jul 2017 14:10:20 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <150152139906.6470.17097413585055666475.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
References: <150152139906.6470.17097413585055666475.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
From: william manning <chinese.apricot@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2017 14:10:20 -0700
Message-ID: <CACfw2hhfzVBMazvNtcnyhfwtm-K6hvYhLBBmBOE2+qWrNiB3WA@mail.gmail.com>
To: 99attendees@ietf.org
Cc: 99all@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a1143dffc5b9b660555a375c3"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/99attendees/2CHq4uEeHnGy52eqDxSUAL5EJYA>
Subject: Re: [99attendees] [99all] IETF 99 Meeting Survey
X-BeenThere: 99attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mailing list of IETF 99 attendees that have opted in on this list <99attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/99attendees>, <mailto:99attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/99attendees/>
List-Post: <mailto:99attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:99attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/99attendees>, <mailto:99attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2017 21:10:23 -0000

Since I didn't register or attend, it would be improper for me to respond
to your survey.

/Wm

On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 10:16 AM, IETF Secretariat <
ietf-secretariat@ietf.org> wrote:

> We hope that you enjoyed IETF 99 in Prague. Please help us to improve
> future meetings by completing the brief survey (we estimate it will take
> less than five minutes) found here: https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/ietf99.
>
> Your feedback is very valuable to us.
>
> Please note that this survey is designed for attendees who were in Prague
> for at least a portion of the IETF meeting week. A separate survey will be
> distributed to remote-only attendees.
>
> If you attended any of the tutorials on Sunday, we would also appreciate
> your feedback on them:
>
> - Newcomer’s Orientation: https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/99newcomers
>
> - IRTF Overview: https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/99irtf
>
> - IEEE 802.1 Time Sensitive Networking: https://www.surveymonkey.com/
> r/99ieee
>
> - TEEP: https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/99teep
>
> - DNS Privacy: https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/99dnsprivacy
>
> Thank you very much and we hope to see you in Singapore for IETF 100!
>
> -IETF Secretariat
>
> _______________________________________________
> 99all mailing list
> 99all@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/99all
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email