Re: [99attendees] [99all] IETF 99 Meeting Survey

Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> Tue, 01 August 2017 17:01 UTC

Return-Path: <cabo@tzi.org>
X-Original-To: 99attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 99attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 343B612ECB7 for <99attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 1 Aug 2017 10:01:27 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id n6kIVLKsuEch for <99attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 1 Aug 2017 10:01:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailhost.informatik.uni-bremen.de (mailhost.informatik.uni-bremen.de [IPv6:2001:638:708:30c9::12]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DAB89126C22 for <99attendees@ietf.org>; Tue, 1 Aug 2017 10:01:25 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at informatik.uni-bremen.de
Received: from submithost.informatik.uni-bremen.de (submithost.informatik.uni-bremen.de [134.102.201.11]) by mailhost.informatik.uni-bremen.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id v71H14R1001787; Tue, 1 Aug 2017 19:01:04 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from client-0208.vpn.uni-bremen.de (client-0208.vpn.uni-bremen.de [134.102.107.208]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by submithost.informatik.uni-bremen.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3xMMz36Qt3zDMB7; Tue, 1 Aug 2017 19:01:03 +0200 (CEST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.3 \(3273\))
From: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
In-Reply-To: <9F01D52D-8D91-43DD-8CF8-7131B26FF07C@amsl.com>
Date: Tue, 1 Aug 2017 19:01:02 +0200
Cc: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>, John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com>, Donald Eastlake <d3e3e3@gmail.com>, 99attendees@ietf.org
X-Mao-Original-Outgoing-Id: 523299662.063226-a938b0e3c7d272421c1a427be29e7722
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <80A6A2CF-5502-4A18-B49F-E94DC5909578@tzi.org>
References: <150152139906.6470.17097413585055666475.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <CAF4+nEHg8j0wE-Wi1_UUN9qNL7iFpzxcZs7zsOwBeBs8xQ-PQg@mail.gmail.c om> <6AC8F1DCD61DEF7FAAD71296@PSB> <F42037C4-6B6D-489B-B495-10416E387A6A@fugue.com> <9F01D52D-8D91-43DD-8CF8-7131B26FF07C@amsl.com>
To: Alexa Morris <amorris@amsl.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3273)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/99attendees/QRma0aPuzxKTrpZe6eGrvMYU14s>
Subject: Re: [99attendees] [99all] IETF 99 Meeting Survey
X-BeenThere: 99attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mailing list of IETF 99 attendees that have opted in on this list <99attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/99attendees>, <mailto:99attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/99attendees/>
List-Post: <mailto:99attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:99attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/99attendees>, <mailto:99attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Aug 2017 17:01:27 -0000

On Aug 1, 2017, at 18:46, Alexa Morris <amorris@amsl.com> wrote:
> 
> The meeting survey was composed using the default Survey Monkey template. However, I’ve just changed the settings with the goal of making it more legible. 

Works for me now in Opera and Chrome.

The now black type on white background helps, the switch to 15px helps, and the serif font helps.

Note that the style still has a too low font-weight of 300, which just happens not to have an effect as droid serif font doesn’t appear to have that light weight.  A font-weight of 300 is fine for slightly more large-type text — if it actually is mapped right; here it appears Chrome/Opera are mapping to Thin (really 200), not to Light.  Bug, I’d say.

Grüße, Carsten