IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [99attendees] [99all] IETF 99 Meeting Survey

Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com> Tue, 01 August 2017 15:59 UTC

Return-Path: <mellon@fugue.com>
X-Original-To: 99attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 99attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2EDB131898 for <99attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 1 Aug 2017 08:59:44 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GqeNI3ZUF_iY for <99attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 1 Aug 2017 08:59:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qt0-x230.google.com (mail-qt0-x230.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c0d::230]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 050CD12EC1D for <99attendees@ietf.org>; Tue, 1 Aug 2017 08:59:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qt0-x230.google.com with SMTP id a18so11772940qta.0 for <99attendees@ietf.org>; Tue, 01 Aug 2017 08:59:42 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date:in-reply-to:cc:to :references; bh=l5qGgC2J8wu/yoC342/hU/EZEhB4PwXHL7F8Aq2TbYo=; b=kRVqdSfd/YPotuQ/VBGUCdYYHQONpMqNf252BFTiK8LTVs4QZt3YTi/jbZzZQmyKKE zNJfcYZVbrFh5wmhJesFM1J75LxqSCV1rjOjyRynDFXYFsthNqtxXh/nzfUdUyT7cUXy Juub53VMlTeP4yuwdEY9sIsjSwsSvNze4AaSTGoItbR48hoyB9biuCg6q7pK/GmliraQ ngHVInWYIt9HAyygt6DYtTVFBh9bKxgu8XO/O2dpr53Cf4lIi9pN73lU3cssQVs3WNwl NWtLhZFCtbcD8u5rSvOjNPptSwoJapL7PiKaUOl3mUpIaOhJNBajc3VS+O8kvxa8+uKE ynWg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date :in-reply-to:cc:to:references; bh=l5qGgC2J8wu/yoC342/hU/EZEhB4PwXHL7F8Aq2TbYo=; b=XgUPlixO3qifhuSEraWCFW8Tlr2IOnyIdbtxKBT7Q1Qb3oABrwhdX9NVENZwOJbrso YZRBzPTXE6y1BREJmagPs4c+h0mf1emYM+Fv9eNotWvAkLlkf0fqxM0iDNbsnhGuV+5w ZztaQnvV9SR2XLn6gvYZCcTL7Dfnn8RR4jntiigP2tQpbQPyTU7W9phM0cHyuDqwCXwz fFnMdpkqk97/z/1JL+XgrSkxcoWecKG+wli5go1vuAASSCtT4ZRWgL8wGLyWzE5az8xj vRxqGp1aBhaydKYMQ+aDxe+wjfNWu3BTNSO1VR8BQFEHOEa9QLCYzDXNFEvPNCh7WL2U m5KQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AIVw112sztUMVH9Ivhuj8peI2ksNoZ6iTaajsfp5Q2uwIYHhQbeMEt4E Qa77IWNmUHIqHBte
X-Received: by 10.200.37.193 with SMTP id f1mr27853244qtf.264.1501603182158; Tue, 01 Aug 2017 08:59:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.0.30.153] (c-73-167-64-188.hsd1.ma.comcast.net. [73.167.64.188]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id v23sm19861319qkb.65.2017.08.01.08.59.40 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 01 Aug 2017 08:59:40 -0700 (PDT)
From: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>
Message-Id: <F42037C4-6B6D-489B-B495-10416E387A6A@fugue.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_34607C75-368F-411F-882B-D408536B6287"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.3 \(3273\))
Date: Tue, 01 Aug 2017 11:59:39 -0400
In-Reply-To: <6AC8F1DCD61DEF7FAAD71296@PSB>
Cc: Donald Eastlake <d3e3e3@gmail.com>, 99attendees@ietf.org, 99all@ietf.org
To: John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com>
References: <150152139906.6470.17097413585055666475.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <CAF4+nEHg8j0wE-Wi1_UUN9qNL7iFpzxcZs7zsOwBeBs8xQ-PQg@mail.gmail.c om> <6AC8F1DCD61DEF7FAAD71296@PSB>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3273)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/99attendees/uCP_SD_n7J-RVKN-meHpO-QkW5Q>
Subject: Re: [99attendees] [99all] IETF 99 Meeting Survey
X-BeenThere: 99attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mailing list of IETF 99 attendees that have opted in on this list <99attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/99attendees>, <mailto:99attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/99attendees/>
List-Post: <mailto:99attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:99attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/99attendees>, <mailto:99attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Aug 2017 15:59:45 -0000

On Aug 1, 2017, at 11:44 AM, John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com> wrote:
> Thanks.  +1.  And thanks for the references as well as pointing
> this out.  I was beginning to wonder if it was just me... and I
> have high-resolution, etc., large screens.

Weirdly, the font is the same size in Chrome and Safari, but is more legible in Safari.   I wonder what is causing this.

That said, choosing fonts with really skinny lines is probably not good for readability by greybeards.   I find this particular survey right on the edge of readability; if my glasses were less good, I probably would be having the same problem Donald had.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email