IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [99attendees] [99all] IETF 99 Meeting Survey

John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com> Tue, 01 August 2017 15:45 UTC

Return-Path: <john-ietf@jck.com>
X-Original-To: 99attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 99attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9224B12ECC6; Tue, 1 Aug 2017 08:45:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8lzTUmRZFIwH; Tue, 1 Aug 2017 08:45:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from bsa2.jck.com (bsa2.jck.com [70.88.254.51]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3E24313178B; Tue, 1 Aug 2017 08:45:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [198.252.137.10] (helo=PSB) by bsa2.jck.com with esmtp (Exim 4.82 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <john-ietf@jck.com>) id 1dcZM0-0000sg-Qf; Tue, 01 Aug 2017 11:45:04 -0400
Date: Tue, 01 Aug 2017 11:44:59 -0400
From: John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com>
To: Donald Eastlake <d3e3e3@gmail.com>, 99attendees@ietf.org
cc: 99all@ietf.org
Message-ID: <6AC8F1DCD61DEF7FAAD71296@PSB>
In-Reply-To: <CAF4+nEHg8j0wE-Wi1_UUN9qNL7iFpzxcZs7zsOwBeBs8xQ-PQg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <150152139906.6470.17097413585055666475.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <CAF4+nEHg8j0wE-Wi1_UUN9qNL7iFpzxcZs7zsOwBeBs8xQ-PQg@mail.gmail.c om>
X-Mailer: Mulberry/4.0.8 (Win32)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 198.252.137.10
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: john-ietf@jck.com
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on bsa2.jck.com); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/99attendees/yC4MK-nEdNXHonMFUy0aDZtnavo>
Subject: Re: [99attendees] [99all] IETF 99 Meeting Survey
X-BeenThere: 99attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mailing list of IETF 99 attendees that have opted in on this list <99attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/99attendees>, <mailto:99attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/99attendees/>
List-Post: <mailto:99attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:99attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/99attendees>, <mailto:99attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Aug 2017 15:45:17 -0000

Don,

Thanks.  +1.  And thanks for the references as well as pointing
this out.  I was beginning to wonder if it was just me... and I
have high-resolution, etc., large screens.

   john


--On Tuesday, August 1, 2017 11:13 -0400 Donald Eastlake
<d3e3e3@gmail.com> wrote:

> I don't know if it is the Secretariat or Survey Monkey, but
> someone has decided to join the trend towards making the
> Internet illegible. See
> http://www.businessinsider.com/how-the-internet-became-unreada
> ble-2016-10
> http://www.telegraph.co.uk/science/2016/10/23/internet-is-beco
> ming-unreadable-because-of-a-trend-towards-light/
> 
> I believe I have always completed the post-meeting survey in
> the past but I have not and will not complete this survey or
> any future surveys that are made hard to read like this.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email