Re: mailserver URL

Jim Conklin <conklin@info.cren.net> Tue, 31 January 1995 21:49 UTC

Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa10218; 31 Jan 95 16:49 EST
Received: from CNRI.Reston.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa10214; 31 Jan 95 16:49 EST
Received: from services.Bunyip.COM by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa22609; 31 Jan 95 16:49 EST
Received: (from daemon@localhost) by services.bunyip.com (8.6.9/8.6.9) id PAA19892 for uri-out; Tue, 31 Jan 1995 15:55:21 -0500
Received: from mocha.bunyip.com (mocha.Bunyip.Com [192.197.208.1]) by services.bunyip.com (8.6.9/8.6.9) with SMTP id PAA19887 for <uri@services.bunyip.com>; Tue, 31 Jan 1995 15:55:18 -0500
Received: from info.cren.net by mocha.bunyip.com with SMTP (5.65a/IDA-1.4.2b/CC-Guru-2b) id AA16813 (mail destined for uri@services.bunyip.com) on Tue, 31 Jan 95 15:55:16 -0500
Received: from [192.52.179.86] ([192.52.179.86]) by info.cren.net (8.6.8.1/8.6.4 (CREN)) with SMTP id PAA23529; Tue, 31 Jan 1995 15:54:12 -0500
Message-Id: <199501312054.PAA23529@info.cren.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Date: Tue, 31 Jan 1995 15:55:09 -0500
To: "Stephen R. van den Berg" <berg@pool.informatik.rwth-aachen.de>, uri@bunyip.com
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: Jim Conklin <conklin@info.cren.net>
Subject: Re: mailserver URL
X-Orig-Sender: owner-uri@bunyip.com
Precedence: bulk

At  1:48 PM 1/31/95 +0100, Stephen R. van den Berg wrote:
>why not simply state in the RFC that
>implementors should initially ignore any header fields except Subject, and
>that on explicit configuration, some specified headers fields are to be
>accepted.

  I like this.

Jim