Re: [abfab] SSTC review of draft-ietf-abfab-aaa-saml-11

Sam Hartman <hartmans@painless-security.com> Tue, 11 August 2015 17:28 UTC

Return-Path: <hartmans@painless-security.com>
X-Original-To: abfab@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: abfab@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A30AF1ACE03 for <abfab@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 11 Aug 2015 10:28:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.91
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.91 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id o6p4pDpjRiyr for <abfab@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 11 Aug 2015 10:28:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.painless-security.com (mail.painless-security.com [23.30.188.241]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9C87F1ACDFF for <abfab@ietf.org>; Tue, 11 Aug 2015 10:28:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.painless-security.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27A3120795; Tue, 11 Aug 2015 13:27:16 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mail.painless-security.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.suchdamage.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id EwUYp4XjRgi8; Tue, 11 Aug 2015 13:27:15 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from carter-zimmerman.suchdamage.org (c-50-136-30-120.hsd1.ma.comcast.net [50.136.30.120]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "laptop", Issuer "laptop" (not verified)) by mail.painless-security.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS; Tue, 11 Aug 2015 13:27:15 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by carter-zimmerman.suchdamage.org (Postfix, from userid 8042) id 26A7680910; Tue, 11 Aug 2015 13:28:30 -0400 (EDT)
From: Sam Hartman <hartmans@painless-security.com>
To: Leif Johansson <leifj@mnt.se>
References: <55C871D0.8010405@mnt.se> <tslzj1x3kc8.fsf@mit.edu> <3FC21C98-D128-4E9C-AACC-18416B30E01E@mnt.se>
Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2015 13:28:30 -0400
In-Reply-To: <3FC21C98-D128-4E9C-AACC-18416B30E01E@mnt.se> (Leif Johansson's message of "Tue, 11 Aug 2015 18:58:17 +0200")
Message-ID: <tsl37zp3fb5.fsf@mit.edu>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/abfab/1H62NmIwftxlzOxEUbuS3OPahZQ>
Cc: "abfab@ietf.org" <abfab@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [abfab] SSTC review of draft-ietf-abfab-aaa-saml-11
X-BeenThere: abfab@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Application Bridging, Federated Authentication Beyond \(the web\)" <abfab.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/abfab>, <mailto:abfab-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/abfab/>
List-Post: <mailto:abfab@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:abfab-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/abfab>, <mailto:abfab-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2015 17:28:32 -0000

>>>>> "Leif" == Leif Johansson <leifj@mnt.se> writes:

    >> 11 aug 2015 kl. 17:39 skrev Sam Hartman
    >> <hartmans@painless-security.com>om>:
    >> 
    >> Do we want to start a WGLC at the same time?

    Leif> I'm inclined to give the SSTC a couple of weeks to respond
    Leif> first - they operate on a 4 week call schedule after all. I
    Leif> don't want to drag this out but we should at least give them a
    Leif> chance to read the thing before we light the fuse.

I don't see why the WG review and SSTC review cannot happen in parallel.
We send to the IESG after successful WGLC plus successful SSTC review.