Re: [abfab] slides for the meetings later today
Sam Hartman <hartmans@painless-security.com> Mon, 20 July 2015 13:30 UTC
Return-Path: <hartmans@painless-security.com>
X-Original-To: abfab@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: abfab@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD85D1A882F for <abfab@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 20 Jul 2015 06:30:07 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.01
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.01 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, J_CHICKENPOX_22=0.6, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xeqiT1rZSkF2 for <abfab@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 20 Jul 2015 06:30:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.painless-security.com (mail.painless-security.com [23.30.188.241]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 31DC91A87AD for <abfab@ietf.org>; Mon, 20 Jul 2015 06:30:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.painless-security.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6BE920755; Mon, 20 Jul 2015 09:29:46 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mail.painless-security.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.suchdamage.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NXxii34QLwGA; Mon, 20 Jul 2015 09:29:46 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from carter-zimmerman.suchdamage.org (dhcp-8970.meeting.ietf.org [31.133.137.112]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "laptop", Issuer "laptop" (not verified)) by mail.painless-security.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS; Mon, 20 Jul 2015 09:29:46 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by carter-zimmerman.suchdamage.org (Postfix, from userid 8042) id 2EF9088672; Mon, 20 Jul 2015 09:30:04 -0400 (EDT)
From: Sam Hartman <hartmans@painless-security.com>
To: Alejandro Pérez Méndez <alex@um.es>
References: <55ACB4BD.9060102@mnt.se> <55ACE95C.1060506@um.es>
Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2015 09:30:04 -0400
In-Reply-To: <55ACE95C.1060506@um.es> ("Alejandro Pérez Méndez"'s message of "Mon, 20 Jul 2015 14:28:12 +0200")
Message-ID: <tslzj2r2bz7.fsf@mit.edu>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/abfab/KiW3wfxP5PvhlRd2TFQDWz1iabM>
Cc: "abfab@ietf.org" <abfab@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [abfab] slides for the meetings later today
X-BeenThere: abfab@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Application Bridging, Federated Authentication Beyond \(the web\)" <abfab.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/abfab>, <mailto:abfab-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/abfab/>
List-Post: <mailto:abfab@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:abfab-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/abfab>, <mailto:abfab-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2015 13:30:07 -0000
In general, I like this approach. However, I'm a bit concerned because to get this approach standardized in the IETF, we,ll need to register a radius URI scheme, which will probably involve a lot more discussion than we'd like. Let's discussi n the session whether we can avoid that URI registration. Everything else looks good about this though.
- [abfab] slides for the meetings later today Leif Johansson
- Re: [abfab] slides for the meetings later today Alejandro Pérez Méndez
- Re: [abfab] slides for the meetings later today Sam Hartman
- Re: [abfab] slides for the meetings later today Leif Johansson
- Re: [abfab] slides for the meetings later today Alejandro Pérez Méndez