Re: [abfab] Alissa Cooper's No Objection on draft-ietf-abfab-aaa-saml-13: (with COMMENT)

Alejandro Pérez Méndez <alex@um.es> Mon, 11 January 2016 08:30 UTC

Return-Path: <alex@um.es>
X-Original-To: abfab@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: abfab@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 636B31A87E1; Mon, 11 Jan 2016 00:30:19 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.502
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.502 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_05=-0.5, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id myR1tVRp6QHM; Mon, 11 Jan 2016 00:30:16 -0800 (PST)
Received: from xenon21.um.es (xenon21.um.es [155.54.212.161]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 324921A87E2; Mon, 11 Jan 2016 00:30:16 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by xenon21.um.es (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7F8C3F836; Mon, 11 Jan 2016 09:30:13 +0100 (CET)
X-Virus-Scanned: by antispam in UMU at xenon21.um.es
Received: from xenon21.um.es ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (xenon21.um.es [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id eOyFiF-xLvDr; Mon, 11 Jan 2016 09:30:13 +0100 (CET)
Received: from [192.168.1.5] (79.109.150.87.dyn.user.ono.com [79.109.150.87]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: alex) by xenon21.um.es (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 54EE13F893; Mon, 11 Jan 2016 09:30:05 +0100 (CET)
To: Alissa Cooper <alissa@cooperw.in>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
References: <20160106194300.4689.14922.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
From: =?UTF-8?Q?Alejandro_P=c3=a9rez_M=c3=a9ndez?= <alex@um.es>
Message-ID: <5693680C.90306@um.es>
Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2016 09:30:04 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.5.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20160106194300.4689.14922.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/abfab/TqtkpgP_kgF2HRNVr8l40W58qNA>
Cc: abfab@ietf.org, abfab-chairs@ietf.org, draft-ietf-abfab-aaa-saml@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [abfab] Alissa Cooper's No Objection on draft-ietf-abfab-aaa-saml-13: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: abfab@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Application Bridging, Federated Authentication Beyond \(the web\)" <abfab.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/abfab>, <mailto:abfab-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/abfab/>
List-Post: <mailto:abfab@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:abfab-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/abfab>, <mailto:abfab-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2016 08:30:19 -0000

Hi Alissa,

thanks for the comments. I agree with you. Thouse MAY should be replaced 
by may (in lowercase).

Regards,
Alejandro

El 06/01/16 a las 20:43, Alissa Cooper escribió:
> Alissa Cooper has entered the following ballot position for
> draft-ietf-abfab-aaa-saml-13: No Objection
>
> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
> email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
> introductory paragraph, however.)
>
>
> Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
> for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
>
>
> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-abfab-aaa-saml/
>
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> COMMENT:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Thanks for answering my questions about extending the SAML spec.
>
> The use of normative MAYs in Section 9 does not seem appropriate.
>
>