Re: [abfab] getting finished

Mark Donnelly <mark@painless-security.com> Fri, 20 November 2015 18:01 UTC

Return-Path: <mark@painless-security.com>
X-Original-To: abfab@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: abfab@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95F6E1B3AE8 for <abfab@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 20 Nov 2015 10:01:52 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.215
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.215 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.8, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.585] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id i9icTZRm5H2v for <abfab@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 20 Nov 2015 10:01:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.painless-security.com (mail.painless-security.com [23.30.188.241]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 429341B3AE7 for <abfab@ietf.org>; Fri, 20 Nov 2015 10:01:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.painless-security.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1ECBE208B1 for <abfab@ietf.org>; Fri, 20 Nov 2015 12:58:51 -0500 (EST)
Received: from mail.painless-security.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.suchdamage.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id sBECjI1wlOvm for <abfab@ietf.org>; Fri, 20 Nov 2015 12:58:50 -0500 (EST)
Received: from [10.113.143.111] (c-73-182-250-48.hsd1.ma.comcast.net [73.182.250.48]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) (Authenticated sender: mark@mail.suchdamage.org) by mail.painless-security.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA for <abfab@ietf.org>; Fri, 20 Nov 2015 12:58:50 -0500 (EST)
To: abfab@ietf.org
References: <56384E83.3050200@sunet.se> <56385DB5.5030804@painless-security.com> <56385FEF.2020404@sunet.se>
From: Mark Donnelly <mark@painless-security.com>
Message-ID: <564F6008.7070507@painless-security.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2015 13:01:44 -0500
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.3.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <56385FEF.2020404@sunet.se>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/abfab/XBYJ0LNvqJiF890-sQiP4EJ-358>
Subject: Re: [abfab] getting finished
X-BeenThere: abfab@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Application Bridging, Federated Authentication Beyond \(the web\)" <abfab.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/abfab>, <mailto:abfab-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/abfab/>
List-Post: <mailto:abfab@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:abfab-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/abfab>, <mailto:abfab-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2015 18:01:52 -0000

On 11/3/2015 2:19 AM, Leif Johansson wrote:
> sorry - I meant UI, use-case is done. The october version got some
> review and my understanding is that it needed updating as a result
> of those comments?

That was the July version, and most of those comments were incorporated
into the October version.  The October version hasn't received any
review that I've seen.  I'd be very happy to have reviewers.

Cheers,
--Mark