IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [abfab] Direction Forward for aaa-saml

Sam Hartman <hartmans@painless-security.com> Wed, 22 July 2015 16:32 UTC

Return-Path: <hartmans@painless-security.com>
X-Original-To: abfab@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: abfab@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A153F1A8870 for <abfab@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 22 Jul 2015 09:32:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.91
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.91 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6Mxw-CylMub4 for <abfab@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 22 Jul 2015 09:32:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.painless-security.com (mail.painless-security.com [23.30.188.241]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B3FEA1A0020 for <abfab@ietf.org>; Wed, 22 Jul 2015 09:32:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.painless-security.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 476342075D; Wed, 22 Jul 2015 12:31:36 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mail.painless-security.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.suchdamage.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Si5TJcTN2Keh; Wed, 22 Jul 2015 12:31:35 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from carter-zimmerman.suchdamage.org (dhcp-89db.meeting.ietf.org [31.133.137.219]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "laptop", Issuer "laptop" (not verified)) by mail.painless-security.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS; Wed, 22 Jul 2015 12:31:35 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by carter-zimmerman.suchdamage.org (Postfix, from userid 8042) id 073128867F; Wed, 22 Jul 2015 12:31:59 -0400 (EDT)
From: Sam Hartman <hartmans@painless-security.com>
To: "Cantor\, Scott" <cantor.2@osu.edu>
References: <tslwpxsy0ql.fsf@mit.edu> <8E4E5965-0E43-4ABD-8853-8A6C7C6926C5@mnt.se> <tsloaj4xzvr.fsf@mit.edu> <0B96365A-4F6B-427A-9A87-70F069473F84@mnt.se> <tsl7fpsxrve.fsf@mit.edu> <0A08B89E-5533-4E34-9014-97C0D7877B6E@osu.edu> <tslio9cw8yd.fsf@mit.edu> <D143C9FB-F878-49C1-89C4-6A494714A3EC@mnt.se> <tslegk0w7iw.fsf@mit.edu> <1FA8CCED-221E-4A88-B525-BF46FAA53A3F@mnt.se> <55AFC0E3.8030500@um.es> <tslpp3kuq2f.fsf@mit.edu> <55AFC24C.3070205@sunet.se> <tslh9owuptm.fsf@mit.edu> <55AFC37D.1040607@mnt.se> <tsl4mkwupis.fsf@mit.edu> <A03FA174-B811-4B78-96D7-4C18C84CB30B@osu.edu>
Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2015 12:31:59 -0400
In-Reply-To: <A03FA174-B811-4B78-96D7-4C18C84CB30B@osu.edu> (Scott Cantor's message of "Wed, 22 Jul 2015 16:29:55 +0000")
Message-ID: <tslzj2otaps.fsf@mit.edu>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/abfab/YjbZbkniFKl6dEsQ5m6eARU9L-c>
Cc: "abfab@ietf.org" <abfab@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [abfab] Direction Forward for aaa-saml
X-BeenThere: abfab@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Application Bridging, Federated Authentication Beyond \(the web\)" <abfab.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/abfab>, <mailto:abfab-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/abfab/>
List-Post: <mailto:abfab@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:abfab-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/abfab>, <mailto:abfab-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2015 16:32:04 -0000

>>>>> "Cantor," == Cantor, Scott <cantor.2@osu.edu> writes:


    Cantor,> Leif's point is that if you don't specify any bindings, you
    Cantor,> won't have any interop issue. But if you don't account for
    Cantor,> the endpoint element(s) in the schema, you can't add them
    Cantor,> later.

O, that's irritating.
Thanks for explaining.
I understand now.

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email