[abfab] ABFAB still active?

Janne Poikolainen <janne.poikolainen@jyu.fi> Mon, 07 March 2016 05:55 UTC

Return-Path: <jajupoik@student.jyu.fi>
X-Original-To: abfab@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: abfab@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E20BB1A90BD for <abfab@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 6 Mar 2016 21:55:05 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.622
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.622 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_20=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id A4AO-a5_3Aaa for <abfab@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 6 Mar 2016 21:55:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ob0-x230.google.com (mail-ob0-x230.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c01::230]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 533481A90B7 for <abfab@ietf.org>; Sun, 6 Mar 2016 21:55:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ob0-x230.google.com with SMTP id ts10so97000644obc.1 for <abfab@ietf.org>; Sun, 06 Mar 2016 21:55:03 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=student-jyu-fi.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:sender:date:message-id:subject:from:to; bh=mqeSMGTAFpRfMULw11Y6HL6Epf3AvSdgPyiMLpwUsBM=; b=g8TGrLVXbP1TyBaT0Nx8uh3YffPOLiSySEmJe6aHUG0eS1nJDq+HgEuUiZA37sImFL DOm0JgRZeYHa9UZe0edhk5dRAOWHYlCmYYrgYhHbRyZ0eoBdkhgRgPdd5DxwQw1kdIfN UdRh5ua7r3bc9uz74oZTW3UMnaJtM//Ab8RKpFDyoVTPxcGxtHFM1lcV6dpw5wNdNrhX gAGCOClIPu0ZtDWkGOMcXCkDcuihNHBzGA5BZZSGm0TU133gqmcpxlFVaom1LzVPLP0v 3a0//DDpi/HhqtAIWXnSN3OK+sG6Pc9jbHCnJ5EUo8t+CMpeyTn8SizKoe7SAzUB7FM6 mV/A==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:date:message-id:subject:from :to; bh=mqeSMGTAFpRfMULw11Y6HL6Epf3AvSdgPyiMLpwUsBM=; b=D+s7eYNeFnMOnMQ41tquaioct6XE+zaO99VcSCCFqQhrjYKqk149MOi5VEdTPRGD4v x7B3XFBlB+e6+wv/WPE3CDffg4YpXzydsHR7TtSigN+MLQ2L6o7yGYfPBi9NVrdOAMpE 4e4dS2Nc6m3XBf4Y9LX7Nph8cZtfXqlfckcOOxLAQo5g3e+L1OV5Dvu16ttAeSBEegAi EN9H7f3uMqYdalb1hdPYEXp2SwhBUGc7gS/VeHCsXn1GbOwP8obfoW/9jlQ54c521eKZ 3U6ON0wGfoQupe1I0lA58s0nMuG+xeNCONGBmk1pwzkKHZzOXOZn6ZfGFGp/F6qh9cnr kaKA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AD7BkJLMJF9dgTV7nhOrI5qm/mfRkX573i6S7Q/F38DWYU9jZiw2y+G8SXCLCSMxO4K+t4y2k4h/lrQsMqGhsh+Z
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.182.142.69 with SMTP id ru5mr12655204obb.82.1457330103326; Sun, 06 Mar 2016 21:55:03 -0800 (PST)
Sender: jajupoik@student.jyu.fi
Received: by 10.76.150.230 with HTTP; Sun, 6 Mar 2016 21:55:03 -0800 (PST)
Date: Mon, 7 Mar 2016 07:55:03 +0200
X-Google-Sender-Auth: nT9xv84wMF44Y8LdhOXUQFcfwps
Message-ID: <CAJex0ARYuPOB8ZvDUz_pEfTPQoGqCcW0FePfw8fAt0CcnJK1ag@mail.gmail.com>
From: Janne Poikolainen <janne.poikolainen@jyu.fi>
To: abfab@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11c2d5ce213eed052d6f1b0e
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/abfab/eS3kyZe0pRLVqh7kFiGVEo9cAP8>
Subject: [abfab] ABFAB still active?
X-BeenThere: abfab@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Application Bridging, Federated Authentication Beyond \(the web\)" <abfab.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/abfab>, <mailto:abfab-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/abfab/>
List-Post: <mailto:abfab@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:abfab-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/abfab>, <mailto:abfab-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Mar 2016 11:03:15 -0000

Hello

I am working on my master's thesis making a comparison study on
authorization methods in constrained environments. I was wondering if ABFAB
is still an active proposal towards ACE WG usecases?

Regards, Janne Poikolainen