IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [abfab] slides for the meetings later today

Alejandro Pérez Méndez <alex@um.es> Mon, 20 July 2015 14:12 UTC

Return-Path: <alex@um.es>
X-Original-To: abfab@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: abfab@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 558C61A8902 for <abfab@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 20 Jul 2015 07:12:19 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.311
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.311 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, J_CHICKENPOX_22=0.6, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id N55hVGNatqk3 for <abfab@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 20 Jul 2015 07:12:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from xenon22.um.es (xenon22.um.es [155.54.212.162]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2312A1A88A1 for <abfab@ietf.org>; Mon, 20 Jul 2015 07:12:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by xenon22.um.es (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7897CF4 for <abfab@ietf.org>; Mon, 20 Jul 2015 16:12:13 +0200 (CEST)
X-Virus-Scanned: by antispam in UMU at xenon22.um.es
Received: from xenon22.um.es ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (xenon22.um.es [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 8hGl5gAbsoIG for <abfab@ietf.org>; Mon, 20 Jul 2015 16:12:13 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [192.168.20.112] (186.160.broadband14.iol.cz [90.181.160.186]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: alex) by xenon22.um.es (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 382F576 for <abfab@ietf.org>; Mon, 20 Jul 2015 16:12:12 +0200 (CEST)
To: abfab@ietf.org
References: <55ACB4BD.9060102@mnt.se> <55ACE95C.1060506@um.es> <tslzj2r2bz7.fsf@mit.edu> <55ACFFED.2010708@sunet.se>
From: =?UTF-8?Q?Alejandro_P=c3=a9rez_M=c3=a9ndez?= <alex@um.es>
Message-ID: <55AD01B0.104@um.es>
Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2015 16:12:00 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <55ACFFED.2010708@sunet.se>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/abfab/fmCSC-Q6Xt5VzWNFxmxqtMzO8_A>
Subject: Re: [abfab] slides for the meetings later today
X-BeenThere: abfab@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Application Bridging, Federated Authentication Beyond \(the web\)" <abfab.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/abfab>, <mailto:abfab-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/abfab/>
List-Post: <mailto:abfab@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:abfab-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/abfab>, <mailto:abfab-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2015 14:12:19 -0000

> On 2015-07-20 15:30, Sam Hartman wrote:
>> In general, I like this approach.  However, I'm a bit concerned because
>> to get this approach standardized in the IETF, we,ll need to register a
>> radius URI scheme, which will probably involve a lot more discussion
>> than we'd like.
>>
>> Let's discussi n the session whether we can avoid that URI registration.
>> Everything else looks good about this though.
> Agree.

That'd be fine to me. The URI scheme I used is just an example of what I 
wanted to achieve.
Maybe using a different and known prefix (such as 
urn:ietf:params:abfab:endpoints:) we could avoid it.


>
>
> _______________________________________________
> abfab mailing list
> abfab@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/abfab

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email