Re: [abfab] SSTC review of draft-ietf-abfab-aaa-saml-11

Leif Johansson <leifj@mnt.se> Tue, 11 August 2015 19:08 UTC

Return-Path: <leifj@mnt.se>
X-Original-To: abfab@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: abfab@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 010B81AD160 for <abfab@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 11 Aug 2015 12:08:15 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QUJkcBYQN5Sh for <abfab@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 11 Aug 2015 12:08:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lb0-f179.google.com (mail-lb0-f179.google.com [209.85.217.179]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A314D1A8861 for <abfab@ietf.org>; Tue, 11 Aug 2015 12:08:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by lbbpu9 with SMTP id pu9so91671373lbb.3 for <abfab@ietf.org>; Tue, 11 Aug 2015 12:08:12 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:content-type:mime-version:subject:from :in-reply-to:date:cc:content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references :to; bh=Y3SLB0W8bAPyb64a7ZHoiSeCIqKQI9Pq/l7S10ZgJ9A=; b=lAAl8zkoUdYGjeycAKxh4a0RkFBkSjIo5rcln08aenXY+hRpgIJhgyO9+Ldrl/7KzV 3sHsoumO6ZjXzTKdcFyAy2TrwGAoMfe5Pudv7nySH36Pzr/KK50W/Feo+nfpm7fXH9B5 MjS+hMIidy0K5T7dWEh4jlBmR6XX302/awG8dPKjbRGuIH9+Bq4mGhgPOX3097rv+KMu mFHN0VmqClwNLmx5y3VzJ+hCsYdXE6xQi7mx0onXltsFzVyIBtbIuf3Nlt8pGYvcihIQ GiXFqy9RYCxIysHWLefnVMQKCBXAXkLOahm4wFXCHdW6UrB7GcluYAx40PGnX/Nh+LfX Op6w==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnXHkZJMKrSMU5Z6sK9enAR46nyvl86DV1RrgEE69pwTlpy6lYmfs5FF5Im2AItOtWBqQHn
X-Received: by 10.152.20.228 with SMTP id q4mr9761446lae.74.1439320092101; Tue, 11 Aug 2015 12:08:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.0.0.140] (tb62-102-145-131.cust.teknikbyran.com. [62.102.145.131]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id ld2sm649913lac.49.2015.08.11.12.08.11 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Tue, 11 Aug 2015 12:08:11 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
From: Leif Johansson <leifj@mnt.se>
X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (12H143)
In-Reply-To: <tsl37zp3fb5.fsf@mit.edu>
Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2015 21:08:10 +0200
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <39B87321-5D39-4CFD-A51E-1EC7A7690D23@mnt.se>
References: <55C871D0.8010405@mnt.se> <tslzj1x3kc8.fsf@mit.edu> <3FC21C98-D128-4E9C-AACC-18416B30E01E@mnt.se> <tsl37zp3fb5.fsf@mit.edu>
To: Sam Hartman <hartmans@painless-security.com>
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/abfab/m9UDdQNU5bISUmgb91LgKS_zxuY>
Cc: "abfab@ietf.org" <abfab@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [abfab] SSTC review of draft-ietf-abfab-aaa-saml-11
X-BeenThere: abfab@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Application Bridging, Federated Authentication Beyond \(the web\)" <abfab.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/abfab>, <mailto:abfab-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/abfab/>
List-Post: <mailto:abfab@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:abfab-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/abfab>, <mailto:abfab-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2015 19:08:16 -0000


11 aug 2015 kl. 19:28 skrev Sam Hartman <hartmans@painless-security.com>om>:

>>>>>> "Leif" == Leif Johansson <leifj@mnt.se> writes:
> 
>>> 11 aug 2015 kl. 17:39 skrev Sam Hartman
>>> <hartmans@painless-security.com>om>:
>>> 
>>> Do we want to start a WGLC at the same time?
> 
>    Leif> I'm inclined to give the SSTC a couple of weeks to respond
>    Leif> first - they operate on a 4 week call schedule after all. I
>    Leif> don't want to drag this out but we should at least give them a
>    Leif> chance to read the thing before we light the fuse.
> 
> I don't see why the WG review and SSTC review cannot happen in parallel.
> We send to the IESG after successful WGLC plus successful SSTC review.

you in a hurry? :-)