IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [abfab] Prague

Leif Johansson <leifj@mnt.se> Wed, 06 May 2015 13:50 UTC

Return-Path: <leifj@mnt.se>
X-Original-To: abfab@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: abfab@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 601FD1A92BC for <abfab@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 6 May 2015 06:50:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id V6-MMCFOT8dc for <abfab@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 6 May 2015 06:50:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lb0-f171.google.com (mail-lb0-f171.google.com [209.85.217.171]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1FEFA1A92AD for <abfab@ietf.org>; Wed, 6 May 2015 06:50:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by lbbzk7 with SMTP id zk7so8058333lbb.0 for <abfab@ietf.org>; Wed, 06 May 2015 06:50:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to :cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=9wjZh3UQJxa7xEJ+oUlxGPxrcrELz1l7Fs1H2cOZyV0=; b=GdHsw3DcqIclVOhI10YETz+fJhq1YNhiQ8lhR8yS3mBAW5gKlRDNzmxaiqLpP8y4mU MWeSWyDzVJwiHFWJY+n/KMGr3r9MFoX7k1Qvo40cMbZerDu1jdfZGNRZTCqiLj9Wf/bX siXmtyRlPSf9RLTAn7Yg+P36NfGokUk/guPxeH8xCm+qokMbqhcPF3kX+dGrnJlm73ra 20CZ4cUjy6zq4T5CbGtRMguzE/ElNG+Oj1lwCdzHgsAt2jEL+HXYvq2WrtMJyNIXm/7f votyDjKeA4yM/e3LmEFx7uHVYSYaFtNIS/z7q4Gvq6RkRmK8qmO1eEFEusXESNOs4+sd wUKQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmabx6FGDysSxR4x3HPfEV7FtlmlbjgImmXPuWWMXcZukCXPzImF8+G3RAunnWDeSEwHqeo
X-Received: by 10.152.27.74 with SMTP id r10mr28900324lag.31.1430920234673; Wed, 06 May 2015 06:50:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [172.18.241.131] (w193-11-200-249.eduroam.sunet.se. [193.11.200.249]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id f2sm378699lah.39.2015.05.06.06.50.33 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 06 May 2015 06:50:33 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <554A1C29.9060304@mnt.se>
Date: Wed, 06 May 2015 15:50:33 +0200
From: Leif Johansson <leifj@mnt.se>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Sam Hartman <hartmans@painless-security.com>, Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
References: <55424C70.6000604@mnt.se> <554A0C0E.2080808@cs.tcd.ie> <tsloalxri4p.fsf@mit.edu>
In-Reply-To: <tsloalxri4p.fsf@mit.edu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/abfab/y7MGQiqcUbmB0TRIrMJnw1fw-iI>
Cc: abfab@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [abfab] Prague
X-BeenThere: abfab@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Application Bridging, Federated Authentication Beyond \(the web\)" <abfab.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/abfab>, <mailto:abfab-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/abfab/>
List-Post: <mailto:abfab@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:abfab-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/abfab>, <mailto:abfab-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 May 2015 13:50:42 -0000

On 05/06/2015 02:43 PM, Sam Hartman wrote:
>>>>>> "Stephen" == Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie> writes:
> 
>     Stephen> Hiya,
> 
>     Stephen> I just noticed that the use cases draft [1] has been in the
>     Stephen> RFC editor queue for 932 days. Can we close out and get
>     Stephen> that fixed please? I don't mind if that involves meeting
>     Stephen> face to face or not but let's get done eh?
> 
> The issue is that it's blocked on aaa-saml, which is what we want to
> meet about.
> It's purely a missing ref.
> 

Which in itself doesn't necessarily mean we have to meet in person. I'm
wondering if Sam+Alessandro should just get together somewhere and get
the final stuff done for aaa-saml instead of blocking a meeting room
for the 3 of us :-)

	MVH leifj

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email