Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset=utf-8
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3774.600.62\))
From: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
In-Reply-To: <rt-5.0.3-717310-1720644697-873.1367581-9-0@icann.org>
Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2024 06:08:38 +0200
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <BC2CFE1A-2AA3-4F94-B889-377D87A08D9D@tzi.org>
References: <RT-Ticket-1367581@icann.org>
 <rt-5.0.3-945252-1719972220-755.1367581-9-0@icann.org>
 <rt-5.0.3-953546-1719972621-44.1367581-9-0@icann.org>
 <rt-5.0.3-477670-1720490107-143.1367581-9-0@icann.org>
 <rt-5.0.3-717310-1720644697-873.1367581-9-0@icann.org>
To: Sabrina Tanamal via RT <drafts-expert-review-comment@iana.org>
Message-ID-Hash: JCBYY5A5B43JTTHQDYK5CK7PPJLHRMBX
CC: ace@ietf.org, Thomas.Fossati@arm.com
Precedence: list
Subject: =?utf-8?q?=5BAce=5D_Re=3A_=5BIANA_=231367581=5D_expert_review_for_draft-ietf?=
 =?utf-8?q?-ace-revoked-token-notification_=28core-parameters_-_Custom_Probl?=
 =?utf-8?q?em_Detail_Keys=29?=
Archived-At: 
 <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ace/0taLYJOCRH_yZu8K1pRbNa4FShQ>

Hi Amanda,

I approve the registration.

I have an editorial comment on Section 5.1 (which supplies the =
specification that the IANA considerations reference).  This has a =
rather terse definition of the =E2=80=9Ccursor=E2=80=9D field, with no =
indication on where to continue reading (there is an example that gives =
a hunch of at least one intended usage).  There are 135 occurrences of =
the word =E2=80=9Ccursor=E2=80=9D, so it would be rather tedious to find =
the places where the use of the field in problem details is actually =
defined.  Could a reference from Section 5.1 to that text be added?

Gr=C3=BC=C3=9Fe, Carsten




> On 10. Jul 2024, at 22:51, Amanda Baber via RT =
<drafts-expert-review-comment@iana.org> wrote:
>=20
> Hi Thomas, Carsten,
>=20
> We had to submit our ballot response to the IESG today, so we marked =
it "IANA NOT OK." Can one of you get to this one before the telechat =
(1400 UTC tomorrow)?
>=20
> thanks,
> Amanda
>=20
> On Tue Jul 09 01:55:07 2024, amanda.baber wrote:
>> Hi Thomas, Carsten,
>>=20
>> Sending a reminder for this review request. Can you get to this one
>> before Thursday?
>>=20
>> thanks,
>> Amanda
>>=20
>> On Wed Jul 03 02:10:21 2024, amanda.baber wrote:
>>> Hi Thomas and Carsten (cc: ace WG)
>>>=20
>>> Can you review the new Custom Problem Detail Key registration in =
this
>>> document by Wednesday, July 10th?
>>>=20
>>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-ace-revoked-token-
>>> notification-08
>>>=20
>>> This document is on the July 11th IESG telechat agenda. The
>>> registration was added after IETF Last Call, so we just now caught
>>> it.
>>>=20
>>> Unless you ask us to wait for both experts, we'll consider the =
review
>>> complete after we receive the first response.
>>>=20
>>> thanks,
>>>=20
>>> Amanda Baber
>>> IANA Operations Manager
>=20