IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Ace] [Secdispatch] EDHOC

Richard Barnes <rlb@ipv.sx> Wed, 23 January 2019 16:31 UTC

Return-Path: <rlb@ipv.sx>
X-Original-To: ace@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ace@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF197130E9C for <ace@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 23 Jan 2019 08:31:49 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.041
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.041 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.142, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=ipv-sx.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id H4-MalG6FQuF for <ace@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 23 Jan 2019 08:31:47 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ot1-x32f.google.com (mail-ot1-x32f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::32f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 29DF1130E9B for <ace@ietf.org>; Wed, 23 Jan 2019 08:31:47 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ot1-x32f.google.com with SMTP id s5so2439991oth.7 for <ace@ietf.org>; Wed, 23 Jan 2019 08:31:47 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ipv-sx.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=8/iAKQsQUxoFrN28jG7KqInj8y0coEhcS8ItEV9X+4A=; b=0KWoYIHaCOZ6GF/PdPHGOa9RP0fAl0mQnEzI2Ijbf6xvaIOMvFUzxozCVvPab6eypl UBuk1df+4VJ8fd7PmSpGpphHOtYNlT11tIEOmi2u+vHaSUrIVLgwhTu4wH0v2xLqUpG9 BivC161Wxdgemhz/wJXmQLn1GIQKzYhe6c11yc2j5HWKXA9lkeIZwZnccLm4HYqG6OCX POfH+XH4X7C3iFcei4R5hYS/caRDhkHGL4RR5s1zCZEo8j340/3FtkkkL5wrVixWGsA0 wUJA0wID6xAiaIimN6q17IgQOmOYDMWmWZa/2/GC4+HWkU+G2I9/TUiLxIK1cqo3Buf5 89bA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=8/iAKQsQUxoFrN28jG7KqInj8y0coEhcS8ItEV9X+4A=; b=G5UqV8VoUTlkdWX8h9tAn7oIgHc5PdMqKQZnbaCD5tntAe+HtvHin4eIsRt9eLznH0 1pgH6dDZhIPe8Qd19gnZJPwld4utgB6IA32Sn5ai91VM7rg8m9hLq5G2Zjqz3rtdZs6t Hfd+p5sx+UCFyPOvRi8hHOgTSJGFLfZeeT/tYH2Gmk7/lSg3QeR6tpawFRAf9LFl0nak gGKhw2c67+Y+55M/ftN880NGl36nZzeJGVaGAxnl22vgZ2iKEF3IGkicFGS/6SxWLUtI B1iirTTK1q2g3HO/eMkUSeKlJ7ZM4qrZG77vsA0AR4GQVTLzGNrpJpA22hyOppDwN7WU yOaQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AJcUukc7AGW1FwGOd47FqRhz7EIqL8ReFPXdN/uZbVAtUXMyDAV3YeU7 kXqsEbP6mxLHLeXe85PJqcS7RQvi+qG8LcNMZxEIgA==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ALg8bN68bFOs/5qEdzm+AM/hjT4wBrapn2C+EUDaCurkXuSqZy/oQ4GwMeu46FMfN6zBInPhTL4y/jKL0ateS25oB48=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6830:1584:: with SMTP id i4mr1745244otr.116.1548261106222; Wed, 23 Jan 2019 08:31:46 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <D629D980-C059-474F-B259-2700F2EEAE41@ericsson.com> <79FD6563-8ADA-4D73-B8D5-C3D70604CD76@gmail.com> <F72354EF-2FB7-41C0-BCA1-6D4511A410B2@ericsson.com> <47F03C99-68C1-4ADB-873D-F01987D66849@ipv.sx> <20190118172714.GJ81907@kduck.mit.edu> <359EC4B99E040048A7131E0F4E113AFC0185795C45@marathon>
In-Reply-To: <359EC4B99E040048A7131E0F4E113AFC0185795C45@marathon>
From: Richard Barnes <rlb@ipv.sx>
Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2019 11:31:34 -0500
Message-ID: <CAL02cgQgoxrxzBHk9pCvWwg8n91gpfK=4kReGfFfb=Av8=CoCw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Roman Danyliw <rdd@cert.org>
Cc: Benjamin Kaduk <kaduk@mit.edu>, "secdispatch@ietf.org" <secdispatch@ietf.org>, Kathleen Moriarty <kathleen.moriarty.ietf@gmail.com>, "ace@ietf.org" <ace@ietf.org>, Göran Selander <goran.selander@ericsson.com>, Francesca Palombini <francesca.palombini@ericsson.com>, John Mattsson <john.mattsson@ericsson.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000041a7e4058022a1a5"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ace/5VoRT2kwL_RSI57ADWX0FwgHydQ>
Subject: Re: [Ace] [Secdispatch] EDHOC
X-BeenThere: ace@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Authentication and Authorization for Constrained Environments \(ace\)" <ace.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ace>, <mailto:ace-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ace/>
List-Post: <mailto:ace@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ace-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ace>, <mailto:ace-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2019 16:31:50 -0000

Summing up where I believe the conversation stands now, it seems like what
folks are asking for is either:

1. An analysis that shows that EDHOC is equivalent to an existing AKE
(e.g., IKE or TLS), or
2. An argument that a new AKE is necessary (vs. a re-encoding of an
existing AKE)

Göran et al: Do you have thoughts on those points?

It seems like it could be a productive use of an hour or two of virtual
interim time to help the group understand one of those lines of argument.

--Richard

On Tue, Jan 22, 2019 at 6:03 PM Roman Danyliw <rdd@cert.org> wrote:

>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Ace [mailto:ace-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Benjamin Kaduk
> > Sent: Friday, January 18, 2019 12:27 PM
> > To: Richard Barnes <rlb@ipv.sx>
> > Cc: secdispatch@ietf.org
> > Subject: Re: [Ace] [Secdispatch] EDHOC
> >
> > On Fri, Jan 18, 2019 at 11:54:58AM -0500, Richard Barnes wrote:
> > > If it would be helpful to keep this moving, we could certainly arrange
> > > a virtual interim on this topic.
> >
> > That seems likely to be useful, though I suppose we should wait to see
> more
> > indication that people would show up and have a productive discussion.
>
> IMO, the common thread between both of these practical suggestions is that
> the complexity of the topic can't entirely fit into the time that would be
> allotted during secdispatch during the IETF 104 meeting.  Let's start this
> conversation on list now.
>
> Roman
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email