IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Ace] WGLC for draft-ietf-ace-coap-est - optimization for embedded devices

Jim Schaad <ietf@augustcellars.com> Fri, 25 January 2019 02:32 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf@augustcellars.com>
X-Original-To: ace@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ace@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AEDBC128D0C for <ace@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 24 Jan 2019 18:32:34 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NuruW7ljFdxU for <ace@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 24 Jan 2019 18:32:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail2.augustcellars.com (augustcellars.com [50.45.239.150]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D0AE8128D09 for <ace@ietf.org>; Thu, 24 Jan 2019 18:32:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: from Jude (73.180.8.170) by mail2.augustcellars.com (192.168.0.56) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1395.4; Thu, 24 Jan 2019 18:32:26 -0800
From: Jim Schaad <ietf@augustcellars.com>
To: 'Michael Richardson' <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>, 'Esko Dijk' <esko.dijk@iotconsultancy.nl>
CC: ace@ietf.org
References: <DB6P190MB0054743FDD8DB32669C5BB23FD990@DB6P190MB0054.EURP190.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM> <23266.1548345661@localhost>
In-Reply-To: <23266.1548345661@localhost>
Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2019 18:32:24 -0800
Message-ID: <00a901d4b456$36643130$a32c9390$@augustcellars.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 16.0
Thread-Index: AQKPe14W3mTmO1gk9I6z01h4BEwvRAHW02qJpDr+wfA=
Content-Language: en-us
X-Originating-IP: [73.180.8.170]
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ace/8C_HKWenhuuRFuslwXgV8-uVtVc>
Subject: Re: [Ace] WGLC for draft-ietf-ace-coap-est - optimization for embedded devices
X-BeenThere: ace@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Authentication and Authorization for Constrained Environments \(ace\)" <ace.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ace>, <mailto:ace-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ace/>
List-Post: <mailto:ace@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ace-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ace>, <mailto:ace-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2019 02:32:35 -0000

As ACE co-chair,


Of anybody on the mailing list believes that the document should not add a
new CoAP content type for "application/pkix-cert" please speak up before
next Monday.

Jim


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ace <ace-bounces@ietf.org> On Behalf Of Michael Richardson
> Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2019 8:01 AM
> To: Esko Dijk <esko.dijk@iotconsultancy.nl>
> Cc: ace@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [Ace] WGLC for draft-ietf-ace-coap-est - optimization for
> embedded devices
> 
> 
> Esko Dijk <esko.dijk@iotconsultancy.nl> wrote:
>     > So to reduce code size for embedded implementations it would be very
>     > beneficial if the EST Server would support an additional content
>     > format:
>     > application/pkix-cert  (see RFC 5280)
> 
> So, to implement this in the specification, we need an additional Content-
> Type value to be allocated.
> 
> If we have WG Consensus to add this, then we can spin the document and
> ask for another early allocation.
> 
> --
> Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>, Sandelman Software Works
> -= IPv6 IoT consulting =-
> 
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email