IETF Logo Mail Archive

[Ace] Re: [lamps] Re: Re: [Anima] should I-D Action: draft-ietf-lamps-rfc7030-csrattrs-21.txt update rfc9148

Michael Richardson <mcr@sandelman.ca> Fri, 27 June 2025 17:45 UTC

Return-Path: <mcr@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: ace@mail2.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ace@mail2.ietf.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF09A3A7B5BD; Fri, 27 Jun 2025 10:45:05 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ietf.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.4
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.4 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: mail2.ietf.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=sandelman.ca
Received: from mail2.ietf.org ([166.84.6.31]) by localhost (mail2.ietf.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dqX-_xOwxvwm; Fri, 27 Jun 2025 10:45:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca (tuna.sandelman.ca [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:3:216:3eff:fe7c:d1f3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-256) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6F9203A7B5B8; Fri, 27 Jun 2025 10:45:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id A04333898B; Fri, 27 Jun 2025 13:45:04 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (amavis, port 10024) with LMTP id zfVvOFyNPk7B; Fri, 27 Jun 2025 13:45:02 -0400 (EDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sandelman.ca; s=mail; t=1751046302; bh=+IyEKf+Nh/bPG5GHKaVAc2NnCcbEiL9S86goNyP87bY=; h=From:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=YEbxMYZXa5MKYNC6IukP5Wmfy6MyLZXj6H3AQGlVJDAK6stkoNKUbUHW7iFbg+av/ xuWZEsv8grkmJHlvCpxQtPxyx2Chz5VqQ98Q/viBY8Zx7JxNHRKBmNeXFmaG/eZnEP EvfD8XVN5gmG8dup/U7jO8HDvMCo4jQo+/WcUKFn7rfeSR6pMrQQosnu4OlokgCNCb 1lyGZJng8ntMFBdjF1qozVbZ8CN2LUdrqYFy7l0FiKeC6YgEo7qbYyH8/5JjMdusN4 E0/C5vVa2FhauukZhonY0WwuCQIJw8V4n9WxDsm/QELZom5rXZbqQsye2UhRAF1+af tkOuKxMNmQWpQ==
Received: from sandelman.ca (unknown [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:2:b241:6fff:fe09:a92b]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A3F438982; Fri, 27 Jun 2025 13:45:02 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from obiwan.sandelman.ca (obiwan.sandelman.ca [127.0.0.1]) by sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6114F19A; Fri, 27 Jun 2025 13:45:02 -0400 (EDT)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr@sandelman.ca>
To: Deb Cooley <debcooley1@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAGgd1OeYbPZPKfjnKDomMxUwTRj+9rNd1cK6RSQqe48xYVS-tA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <174670512923.1130889.15175426048702780435@dt-datatracker-58d4498dbd-6gzjf> <1360700.1746705543@dyas> <aBzXoBC0EZU2lXP7@faui48e.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> <CAGgd1Od9-pbhQQcrHNXrUxHQKm51ex8_KmGjAUOWHFkr=f8xPw@mail.gmail.com> <1393333.1746740754@dyas> <aClrVlQ6DIxcVZYE@kduck.mit.edu> <14520.1747701831@obiwan.sandelman.ca> <CAGgd1Odt=brJFDNZVPzBgtR4xVuPZb=qTz-5a-VCGrAN=kuPjg@mail.gmail.com> <1175.1747750600@obiwan.sandelman.ca> <8664.1747758893@obiwan.sandelman.ca> <CAGgd1OeYbPZPKfjnKDomMxUwTRj+9rNd1cK6RSQqe48xYVS-tA@mail.gmail.com>
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6+git; nmh 1.8+dev; GNU Emacs 28.2
X-Face: $\n1pF)h^`}$H>Hk{L"x@)JS7<%Az}5RyS@k9X%29-lHB$Ti.V>2bi.~ehC0;<'$9xN5Ub# z!G,p`nR&p7Fz@^UXIn156S8.~^@MJ*mMsD7=QFeq%AL4m<nPbLgmtKK-5dC@#:k
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <32428.1751046302.1@obiwan.sandelman.ca>
Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2025 13:45:02 -0400
Message-ID: <32429.1751046302@obiwan.sandelman.ca>
Message-ID-Hash: AOGYFIQKJQMNUETOQD66CFFOTDWFBOKJ
X-Message-ID-Hash: AOGYFIQKJQMNUETOQD66CFFOTDWFBOKJ
X-MailFrom: mcr@sandelman.ca
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-ace.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: spasm@ietf.org, draft-ietf-lamps-rfc7030-csrattrs.authors@ietf.org, ace@ietf.org, anima@ietf.org, Toerless Eckert <tte@cs.fau.de>
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc6
Precedence: list
Subject: [Ace] Re: [lamps] Re: Re: [Anima] should I-D Action: draft-ietf-lamps-rfc7030-csrattrs-21.txt update rfc9148
List-Id: "Authentication and Authorization for Constrained Environments (ace)" <ace.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ace/97lRgx-vWlu_UjNgsIa4lv9ME88>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ace>
List-Help: <mailto:ace-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:ace-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:ace@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:ace-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ace-leave@ietf.org>

Deb Cooley <debcooley1@gmail.com> wrote:
    > crickets?  What is the plan?

I don't think its up to me to say it's a good or bad idea.
You asked that we get an endorsement for this text from ACE and ANIMA.
So far, no objections.   Do you see rough consensus?

    > The PR is ok, except you need to add something to the abstract to say
    > you are updating RFC 9148.

Yes, I will add that to the PR.

+RFC9148 is derived from RFC7030, and it is also updated.

v2.37.1 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status