IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Ace] Group Communication Security Disagreements

Ludwig Seitz <ludwig@sics.se> Mon, 12 September 2016 07:32 UTC

Return-Path: <ludwig@sics.se>
X-Original-To: ace@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ace@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9BFCC12B04A for <ace@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 12 Sep 2016 00:32:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.701
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.701 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=sics.se
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MjxKkdK3GXaz for <ace@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 12 Sep 2016 00:32:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lf0-x233.google.com (mail-lf0-x233.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c07::233]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C66BD12B03D for <ace@ietf.org>; Mon, 12 Sep 2016 00:32:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lf0-x233.google.com with SMTP id l131so80729862lfl.2 for <ace@ietf.org>; Mon, 12 Sep 2016 00:32:31 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sics.se; s=google; h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :in-reply-to; bh=DKjsxpGSirwjEZaAaY8uSxSFBx3SL5apf2C+nQ4EyAA=; b=MaHdFCfUDVv0eCup6roewIyJqLwUaIAOnLLcba3pA95fefvsCnf5RLuM/ZVhjZi+9/ a/bOa5qW6J+S/x+2vyHTVTAR0i1MKo0j9zx5Z3e/cgx9LNFsr7MV1A39Sn2Eksko141c NFqj28lHBWMaaUjKibXXO5taHK/pElrou1e+tuJrupwtIdmrusLOkP58YDlMVzY7JfiW TXIF6V6CMLNj81+w/VM00NTyEZI8vtqNB8AHWMv/lSILfK6FT6vPiiby6Hn/oUlJl+mg YysGo109BeGCWP5YRiXhju3MOhpfnzp5SGqIs8MTOOd5MO6wNWLgNUF3pxw+n/HBE+1u IHlQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=DKjsxpGSirwjEZaAaY8uSxSFBx3SL5apf2C+nQ4EyAA=; b=WvLIlMBHDmEOyPuYV1DoBRTHP8M0wWY/x2mWTRdMQGT5LBOiQtaTlYi8+S/RAj/k1l Abs39SJEmqGS9WCnr6OgqKI2f+XDuwkZ+X9o2lzF69SAZ8bpuoGrGIkPbSm5+Pfla52w X/Elxff/G4UtE90VhL/FK5/O6MUdmUeadFbJM/NiuLViaOSXvzN4+Unujmbuw9EHX8sC oV+cKbVB8lAUZNMq0EA2lLd7HzGPYyvZtnDOuqg47kIU8MDxc/zPlk+4bNvLi9f5aHb0 AHe1KRQsweiRwORK/jQUiayEYG6QW/qZRZO9g+HAIBB5E7owg0YukPdBSOQePIK85AqE oxhw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AE9vXwPdH0ehk7h7WgFGH5OdY9JrZSfxH+m6HJ0KNNmDM1ycKqyCTmeJbee+XQ0iZcLQ5R3F
X-Received: by 10.25.31.9 with SMTP id f9mr4401300lff.34.1473665549440; Mon, 12 Sep 2016 00:32:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.0.166] ([85.235.12.155]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id g70sm2942391ljg.22.2016.09.12.00.32.28 for <ace@ietf.org> (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 12 Sep 2016 00:32:28 -0700 (PDT)
To: ace@ietf.org
References: <57909032.10809@gmx.net> <6d259c5b-28e3-c748-4590-0c9f942fe343@comcast.net> <378a0359-6b31-a30c-af28-8ea567b06b00@cisco.com> <57963480.2000809@gmx.net> <0d4c6d56-ebb5-2f43-d555-29c336396033@ericsson.com> <15169.1469642303@obiwan.sandelman.ca> <CAHbuEH4u=AF1LSoDq+YfLwt+VX1OOrj54331GuZmyjLswHvNnw@mail.gmail.com> <3271.1469656595@obiwan.sandelman.ca> <32aa7104-70df-80c7-8d6e-537b66716de9@comcast.net> <13663.1469714549@obiwan.sandelman.ca> <9a4153f1-6a96-0ae6-020b-0f0f966aecdf@cisco.com> <95997f84-2715-3287-39d3-45d6ff5f3ea0@comcast.net>
From: Ludwig Seitz <ludwig@sics.se>
Message-ID: <463a5cce-9dd1-5d68-bd97-0f08d0719960@sics.se>
Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2016 09:32:15 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.2.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <95997f84-2715-3287-39d3-45d6ff5f3ea0@comcast.net>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg="sha-256"; boundary="------------ms020900020700070406060506"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ace/9OizEKHI88siFtK8MaNELl8yz3Q>
Subject: Re: [Ace] Group Communication Security Disagreements
X-BeenThere: ace@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Authentication and Authorization for Constrained Environments \(ace\)" <ace.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ace>, <mailto:ace-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ace/>
List-Post: <mailto:ace@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ace-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ace>, <mailto:ace-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2016 07:32:35 -0000

On 2016-09-09 21:44, Michael StJohns wrote:
> Hi -
>
> It's been over a month since there's been any further discussion on this
> topic.   Given the record I would suggest a lack of consensus to proceed
> on basis of two items:  1) A roughly even split on the vocal yays and
> nays on the subject of symmetric key multicast for control functions and
> 2) a failure to address the specific concern of "How do you enforceably
> keep a cheap, unsafe-in-the-broader-internet security mechanism off the
> broader internet?"
>
> Your mileage may vary.
>
> Mike
>

Can we at least agree to work on group communication with source 
authentication?

/Ludwig


-- 
Ludwig Seitz, PhD   SICS Swedish ICT AB
Ideon Science Park, Building Beta 2
Scheelevägen 17, SE-223 70 Lund
Phone +46(0)70-349 92 51

The RISE institutes SP, Swedish ICT and Innventia are merging in order 
to create a unified institute sector and become a stronger innovation 
partner for businesses and society. At the end of the year we will 
change our name to RISE. Read more at www.ri.se/en/about-rise

v2.36.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status