IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Ace] IETF 108 tentative agenda and presentations (Daniel Migault)

Benjamin Kaduk <kaduk@mit.edu> Tue, 21 July 2020 21:58 UTC

Return-Path: <kaduk@mit.edu>
X-Original-To: ace@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ace@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B78D43A0AE0 for <ace@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 21 Jul 2020 14:58:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.919
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.919 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id uQ4lGLXTTA46 for <ace@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 21 Jul 2020 14:58:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from outgoing.mit.edu (outgoing-auth-1.mit.edu [18.9.28.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 714203A0ADE for <ace@ietf.org>; Tue, 21 Jul 2020 14:58:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from kduck.mit.edu ([24.16.140.251]) (authenticated bits=56) (User authenticated as kaduk@ATHENA.MIT.EDU) by outgoing.mit.edu (8.14.7/8.12.4) with ESMTP id 06LLwQJR013672 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 21 Jul 2020 17:58:29 -0400
Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2020 14:58:25 -0700
From: Benjamin Kaduk <kaduk@mit.edu>
To: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
Cc: Mohit Sahni <mohit06jan@gmail.com>, ace@ietf.org
Message-ID: <20200721215825.GB41010@kduck.mit.edu>
References: <mailman.1850.1595355742.7860.ace@ietf.org> <CAEpwuw0JN9RGzEBs+fmcL18OFcHzKj_DDzXCt4VkSkSmG3Rvnw@mail.gmail.com> <9794.1595363465@localhost>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <9794.1595363465@localhost>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.12.1 (2019-06-15)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ace/Dk-L66crWgtblZ9ihYCIMKXySqw>
Subject: Re: [Ace] IETF 108 tentative agenda and presentations (Daniel Migault)
X-BeenThere: ace@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Authentication and Authorization for Constrained Environments \(ace\)" <ace.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ace>, <mailto:ace-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ace/>
List-Post: <mailto:ace@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ace-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ace>, <mailto:ace-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2020 21:58:35 -0000

On Tue, Jul 21, 2020 at 04:31:05PM -0400, Michael Richardson wrote:
> 
> Mohit Sahni <mohit06jan@gmail.com> wrote:
>     > To give some background, this draft is an extension of Light Weight CMP
>     > Profile (
>     > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-lamps-lightweight-cmp-profile-02)
>     > draft currently under development in the LAMPS WG. We discussed the "CMPv2
>     > over CoAP" draft in the LAMPS WG and figured out that ACE WG is a more
>     > appropriate place for this draft. However, Jim suggested that we will need
>     > to modify the charter  of the ACE WG to adopt this draft.
> 
> We did est-over-coaps [still in the queue], why shouldn't we do cmp-over-coap(s)?

It may just be that "est-over-coaps is so obviously us" that I didn't check
the charter carefully at that time.  But, at this point, we're probably
overdue for a recharter anyway, as the core framework is making its way to
the IESG.

-Ben

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email