IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Ace] Group Communication Security Disagreements

Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> Wed, 27 July 2016 17:58 UTC

Return-Path: <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: ace@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ace@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2BAD812B02B for <ace@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 27 Jul 2016 10:58:25 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.188
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.188 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.287, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1jfxvU4qcV6S for <ace@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 27 Jul 2016 10:58:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca (tuna.sandelman.ca [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:3:216:3eff:fe7c:d1f3]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EC54F127071 for <ace@ietf.org>; Wed, 27 Jul 2016 10:58:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sandelman.ca (obiwan.sandelman.ca [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:2::247]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7FAE5200A3 for <ace@ietf.org>; Wed, 27 Jul 2016 14:08:18 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from obiwan.sandelman.ca (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2BBA3638BE for <ace@ietf.org>; Wed, 27 Jul 2016 13:58:23 -0400 (EDT)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
To: ace@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <0d4c6d56-ebb5-2f43-d555-29c336396033@ericsson.com>
References: <57909032.10809@gmx.net> <6d259c5b-28e3-c748-4590-0c9f942fe343@comcast.net> <378a0359-6b31-a30c-af28-8ea567b06b00@cisco.com> <57963480.2000809@gmx.net> <0d4c6d56-ebb5-2f43-d555-29c336396033@ericsson.com>
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6; nmh 1.6+dev; GNU Emacs 24.5.1
X-Face: $\n1pF)h^`}$H>Hk{L"x@)JS7<%Az}5RyS@k9X%29-lHB$Ti.V>2bi.~ehC0; <'$9xN5Ub# z!G,p`nR&p7Fz@^UXIn156S8.~^@MJ*mMsD7=QFeq%AL4m<nPbLgmtKK-5dC@#:k
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2016 13:58:23 -0400
Message-ID: <15169.1469642303@obiwan.sandelman.ca>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ace/EbPmx4vUdAo4Pozn1gLrm_SdWSc>
Subject: Re: [Ace] Group Communication Security Disagreements
X-BeenThere: ace@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Authentication and Authorization for Constrained Environments \(ace\)" <ace.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ace>, <mailto:ace-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ace/>
List-Post: <mailto:ace@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ace-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ace>, <mailto:ace-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2016 17:58:26 -0000

Mohit Sethi <mohit.m.sethi@ericsson.com> wrote:
    > designed/developed/specified for their use-case. I could definitely
    > see some IoT startup building a solution that switches on the lights
    > in a room as soon as you unlock the door (thus keeping them in the
    > same group).

Or perhaps more usefully, turning the lights (and the oven) off when you
leave the house.

(How long did it take to get automobiles that turned the headlights off when the key
was removed?)

--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>, Sandelman Software Works
 -= IPv6 IoT consulting =-

v2.37.1 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status