Re: [Ace] [EXTERNAL] Zaheduzzaman Sarker's No Objection on draft-ietf-ace-oauth-params-13: (with COMMENT)

[Zaheduzzaman Sarker <[e-mail]>]

Sure. Thanks.

BR
Zahed

On 2021-03-26, 15:08, "Seitz Ludwig" <[e-mail]> wrote:

    Hello Zahed,

    If it's ok with you I'll fix that in conjunction with the IETF-editor review (they will probably find a few more like this).

    /Ludwig

    > -----Original Message-----
    > From: Zaheduzzaman Sarker <[e-mail]>
    > Sent: den 26 mars 2021 15:04
    > To: Seitz Ludwig <[e-mail]>; The IESG <[e-mail]>
    > Cc: [e-mail]; [e-mail]; [e-mail]
    > Subject: Re: [EXTERNAL] Zaheduzzaman Sarker's No Objection on draft-ietf-
    > ace-oauth-params-13: (with COMMENT)
    > 
    > Thanks for the update. My comments are addressed now.
    > 
    > Found a nit : It is RECOMMENDED that an AS reject a request
    >       containing a symmetric key value in the 'req_cnf' field
    >       (kty=Symmetric), since the AS is expected to be able to generate
    >       better symmetric keys than a constrained client. client (Note: this does
    >       not apply to key identifiers referencing a symmetric key).
    > 
    > s/reject/rejects
    > 
    > BR
    > Zahed
    > 
    > 
    > On 2021-03-26, 08:17, "iesg on behalf of Seitz Ludwig" <iesg-
    > [e-mail] on behalf of [e-mail]> wrote:
    > 
    >     Hello Zaheduzzaman,
    > 
    >     Thank you for your review. The issues you found are now fixed in version -
    > 14.
    > 
    >     Note that there seems to be an problem with xml2rfc, since the outdated
    > reference to draft-ietf-ace-oauth-authz-33 should have been taken care of
    > by the tooling.
    >     I have notified the maintainer of xml2rfc and fixed the draft manually.
    > 
    >     /Ludwig
    > 
    >     > -----Original Message-----
    >     > From: Zaheduzzaman Sarker via Datatracker <[e-mail]>
    >     > Sent: den 24 mars 2021 10:31
    >     > To: The IESG <[e-mail]>
    >     > Cc: [e-mail]; [e-mail];
    > [e-mail]
    >     > Subject: [EXTERNAL] Zaheduzzaman Sarker's No Objection on draft-ietf-
    > ace-
    >     > oauth-params-13: (with COMMENT)
    >     >
    >     > Zaheduzzaman Sarker has entered the following ballot position for
    >     > draft-ietf-ace-oauth-params-13: No Objection
    >     >
    >     > When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
    > email
    >     > addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
    > introductory
    >     > paragraph, however.)
    >     >
    >     >
    >     > Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-
    > criteria.html
    >     > for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
    >     >
    >     >
    >     > The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
    >     > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ace-oauth-params/
    >     >
    >     >
    >     >
    >     > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
    >     > COMMENT:
    >     > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
    >     >
    >     > * Section 1:
    >     >    Nit : s/Respresentation/Representation
    >     >
    >     > * Section 3.1:
    >     >   I have similar observation as Martin Duke, and the resolution suggested
    > by
    >     >   author looks fine with me as long as the cases are distinguishable.
    >     >
    >     > * Section 12:
    >     >    Refers to draft-ietf-ace-oauth-authz-33, -38 version is available now.
    >     >
    >     >
    >