Re: [Ace] WGLC for draft-ietf-ace-oauth-params
Jim Schaad <ietf@augustcellars.com> Mon, 22 October 2018 19:10 UTC
Return-Path: <ietf@augustcellars.com>
X-Original-To: ace@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ace@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4261A1294D7; Mon, 22 Oct 2018 12:10:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2-JlRAJXxlGQ; Mon, 22 Oct 2018 12:10:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail2.augustcellars.com (augustcellars.com [50.45.239.150]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DC03C128B14; Mon, 22 Oct 2018 12:10:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from Jude (192.168.1.162) by mail2.augustcellars.com (192.168.1.201) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1347.2; Mon, 22 Oct 2018 12:04:43 -0700
From: Jim Schaad <ietf@augustcellars.com>
To: ace@ietf.org, draft-ietf-ace-oauth-params@ietf.org
References: <065d01d45f4e$bc227690$346763b0$@augustcellars.com>
In-Reply-To: <065d01d45f4e$bc227690$346763b0$@augustcellars.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2018 12:09:25 -0700
Message-ID: <028f01d46a3a$c04bfd80$40e3f880$@augustcellars.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 16.0
Thread-Index: AQKvzUUhmh2spFwNttxau3uvFoFXr6NfFulA
Content-Language: en-us
X-Originating-IP: [192.168.1.162]
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ace/IdR02HD8Gm6T142K9MtZIi70Srg>
Subject: Re: [Ace] WGLC for draft-ietf-ace-oauth-params
X-BeenThere: ace@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Authentication and Authorization for Constrained Environments \(ace\)" <ace.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ace>, <mailto:ace-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ace/>
List-Post: <mailto:ace@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ace-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ace>, <mailto:ace-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2018 19:10:39 -0000
Here are my WGLC comments: * I am not sure that I understand what the protocol flow is when JAR is being used. Is there a potential case where a JWT would be used as the structure of an OAuth response? If so then is there a problem with defining cnf in section 4.1? * We need to have a OAuth CBOR integer mapping registry - the items in section 6 need to be registered into that registry. * Review - is the 'cnf' parameter in section 3.2 ok with the OAuth group or does it need to be renamed as well? * Check that cnf in 4.1 is going to be ok with draft-ietf-oauth-jwt-introspection-response Jim
- [Ace] WGLC for draft-ietf-ace-oauth-params Jim Schaad
- Re: [Ace] WGLC for draft-ietf-ace-oauth-params Jim Schaad
- Re: [Ace] WGLC for draft-ietf-ace-oauth-params Ludwig Seitz
- Re: [Ace] WGLC for draft-ietf-ace-oauth-params Mike Jones
- Re: [Ace] WGLC for draft-ietf-ace-oauth-params Ludwig Seitz