IETF Logo Mail Archive

[Ace] Charter discussion

Daniel Migault <mglt.ietf@gmail.com> Thu, 15 October 2020 17:48 UTC

Return-Path: <mglt.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ace@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ace@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 218AC3A0898 for <ace@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 15 Oct 2020 10:48:12 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.096
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.096 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zIwXcQJFDBac for <ace@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 15 Oct 2020 10:48:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-vk1-xa36.google.com (mail-vk1-xa36.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::a36]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 778F03A0BC6 for <ace@ietf.org>; Thu, 15 Oct 2020 10:48:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-vk1-xa36.google.com with SMTP id h74so826454vkh.6 for <ace@ietf.org>; Thu, 15 Oct 2020 10:48:10 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=Tzyr/aaOhF4Oixk+KnbLyi7gIO54YyUSLsO8w/jd3eQ=; b=njxFrpojLxu3hD3Lbv1VpxbO+NWIQ6GtOmqjcqdrw1RH2L6qAA49jfwtIvy3nekD81 rBCtZbBObn25928SYbh5VX0rFtFUUyo53tw27TAJyYoPlEui1D4p3GILXxf9yNtTlRGH nEi6nwgtPQFWCaoSwsDYyvhdJqtAs7Cg6eaNuSsWlhbDl4CaXZb6/0U+nPR+i/XDfogb dzj+1tSn8i9jMrYewp85A6JeeUiAjCWcrrFyqv+eNKwGvjWv+cfotvOLvhNpYVirqsXN VeNcKJnlsenSx5Ve7A5FpSl5dAownVCUL3LIeMB+ZHp9hGyXkQKJYID/n8LsSYo5/Q1k p1kg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=Tzyr/aaOhF4Oixk+KnbLyi7gIO54YyUSLsO8w/jd3eQ=; b=EDVO2ZZEE7wqnzzSs3a11sN5xWTnZg0vUTYYDBWmRK+OqsG1xOX0cOLlHaB6JL10Tn gdPe5PZIdUCqxcoEn6qiw2G1XPzxT86hDOh38BocwKnN/4+hL5An0+Ki7nUw+E7hFef1 UBS/D2UQ/AyVwQGi4gNAEw/0j/qbQ+dml6ZZEOp9LeESRGvARpyd2Er8e3qZmpoAa0E/ CUvPMhbBTGHoKSDjK1yYc7gPMN0/CxNAutctzuMoBDSk0RC4fneQR3+C8tRTVeIV8bvu rJ9NKncAXmrsdlqkKsxyU2ci5RnqvxZ/55DZxtEdhM6n6FakSOgpCDgJJJrcuyycH8gn owpQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532O4EFTaFBJ+9L4FvjORv7CS85wfpaUturVqqeeIVPpRBoxXpHr RSRJyV+buC4HRB9Vdq3IKfsO6HxurnHBoRo5hj4Sj3wqoMIsSw==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwKgAZz8Dm711cufxMfr1sHaRjwgmWqLi0NAdq8TSr+evgO8QvikH7+uOWAWzjdi5CLAV66Bsj1CobojPyOEww=
X-Received: by 2002:a1f:3a09:: with SMTP id h9mr3419505vka.6.1602784089213; Thu, 15 Oct 2020 10:48:09 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Daniel Migault <mglt.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2020 13:47:58 -0400
Message-ID: <CADZyTkmnV_Dhb5iXzykUyEAskLDg7tj=80CbEBGmSyFQNS2FHw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Ace Wg <ace@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000004a0fb605b1b9401c"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ace/MzGwcfhRt13w09ttkX_tVZgVjTc>
Subject: [Ace] Charter discussion
X-BeenThere: ace@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Authentication and Authorization for Constrained Environments \(ace\)" <ace.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ace>, <mailto:ace-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ace/>
List-Post: <mailto:ace@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ace-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ace>, <mailto:ace-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2020 17:48:12 -0000

Hi,

I would like to start the charter discussion. Here is a draft of a proposed
charter [1].

It seems to be that additional discussion is needed with regard to the last
paragraph related certificate management. In particular the discussion
might revive a discussion that happened in 2017 [2] - when I was not
co-chair of ACE -and considered other expired work such as [3]. Please make
this discussion constructive on this thread.

The fundamental question is whether we need certificate management at this
stage. If the answer is yes, and we have multiple proposals, it would be
good to clarify the position of the different proposals and evaluate
whether a selection is needed or not before validating the charter.

Please provide your inputs on the mailing list before October 30. Of course
for minor edits, you may suggest them directly on the google doc.

Yours,
Daniel

[1]
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1RtxUSvUeBdZWoQkjSj2c3DtR8DuBwPM2BnBXhoDiptY/edit?usp=sharing

[2]
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/minutes-interim-2017-ace-03-201710191300/
[3] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-selander-ace-eals/

-- 
Daniel Migault
Ericsson

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email